Skip to content

Pylint linter fixes #95

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

Pylint linter fixes #95

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Collaborator

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the multicast functionality with improved method organization and clearer public interfaces.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved conditional checks in functions to enhance correctness and prevent unintended behavior.
  • Documentation

    • Updated docstrings for methods to include expected behaviors and clarify return types.
  • Refactor

    • Restructured methods to static methods for better usability and organization.
    • Cleaned up duplicate entries and comments to enhance code clarity.
  • Tests

    • Added assertions to improve validation in test cases.

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file multicast/__main__.py:
 class McastRecvHearDispatch(mtool):
 def NoOp(*args, **kwargs):
 def setupArgs(cls, parser):

Changes in file multicast/hear.py:
 class McastHEAR(multicast.mtool):

Changes in file multicast/recv.py:
 def _hearstep(self, groups, port, iface=None, bind_group=None):

Changes in file multicast/send.py:
 def _sayStep(self, group, port, data):
### ChangeLog:

Changes in file .coveragerc:
 exclude_lines =

Changes in file multicast/__init__.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/__main__.py:
 def useTool(self, tool, **kwargs):

Changes in file multicast/hear.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/recv.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/send.py:
 def _sayStep(self, group, port, data):

Changes in file multicast/skt.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file tests/context.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file tests/test_usage.py:
 def test_aborts_WHEN_calling_multicast_GIVEN_invalid_tools(self):
### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/context.py:
 def checkPythonCommand(args, stderr=None):
 def timePythonCommand(args=[None], stderr=None):
### ChangeLog:

Changes in file multicast/send.py:
 def setupArgs(cls, parser):
…mance (- WIP #94 -)

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file multicast/__init__.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/__main__.py:
 class McastDispatch(mtool):
 class McastNope(mtool):
 def setupArgs(cls, parser):

Changes in file multicast/recv.py:
 def _hearstep(self, groups, port, iface=None, bind_group=None):
 def setupArgs(cls, parser):

Changes in file tests/MulticastUDPClient.py:
 Unknown Changes
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added Multicast Any main project file changes Linter Any linter tool or setting file enhancements Python Lang Changes to Python source code labels Sep 13, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Sep 13, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall linked an issue Sep 13, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces various modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on suppressing specific linting warnings through comments and enhancing code organization. Key changes include the addition of static methods, updates to docstrings for clarity, and minor adjustments to conditional checks. The overall structure and functionality of the code remain intact, with an emphasis on improving code quality and readability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.coveragerc Added skipcq: PYL- under partial_branches to skip certain Pylint checks.
multicast/__init__.py Added comments to suppress linting warnings; removed duplicate entries in a list.
multicast/__main__.py Replaced standalone NoOp function with a static method in McastNope class; updated __all__ list to include McastNope.NoOp.
multicast/hear.py Added comments to suppress linting warnings; minor adjustment in doStep method for clarity.
multicast/recv.py Converted _hearstep method to a static method; added comments to suppress linting warnings; refactored doStep method for readability.
multicast/send.py Updated setupArgs docstring with additional test cases; changed _sayStep to a static method; refactored doStep method for improved readability.
multicast/skt.py Added comments to suppress linting warnings; no functional changes.
tests/MulticastUDPClient.py Added comment to MCastClient class to suppress linting warning.
tests/context.py Modified conditional checks in checkPythonCommand and checkPythonFuzzing functions for correctness.
tests/test_usage.py Added assertions in test_aborts_WHEN_calling_multicast_GIVEN_invalid_tools to validate outputs from useTool method.

Possibly related PRs

  • [UPGRADE] Hardening testing dependencies by pinning #74: The changes in the main PR involve modifications to linting warnings and code quality checks, which align with the objectives of the retrieved PR that aims to enhance the testing environment and ensure proper utilization of dependencies, including those related to code quality.

Poem

🐰 In the code where rabbits hop,
Linting warnings now will stop!
Functions tidy, methods neat,
Code is clear and can't be beat!
With each change, we celebrate,
A joyful code, oh, isn’t it great? 🌟

Tip

OpenAI O1 model for chat
  • We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat.
  • OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model.
  • Please share any feedback with us in the discussions post.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2eff3e and 00ede8d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • multicast/main.py (14 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
multicast/__main__.py (1)

Pattern multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
Ruff
multicast/__main__.py

82-82: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)

Additional comments not posted (2)
multicast/__main__.py (2)

222-257: LGTM!

The NoOp function has been correctly implemented as a static method within the McastNope class. The docstring is comprehensive and includes acceptance tests.


Line range hint 333-434: LGTM!

The setupArgs method correctly sets up the command-line arguments using the argparse module. The docstring includes comprehensive acceptance tests that cover various scenarios and edge cases. The method also handles None input correctly by returning it untouched.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Testing Something can be verified CI Continuous Integration Tooling labels Sep 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2024

❌ 3 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
414 3 411 6
View the top 3 failed tests by shortest run time
tests.context tests.context.checkCovCommand
Stack Traces | 0.004s run time
259 		args (list): A list of command arguments, defaulting to [None].
260 
261 	Returns:
262 		list: The modified list of arguments with 'coverage run' options added as applicable.
263 
264 	Examples:
265 		&gt;&gt;&gt; checkCovCommand(["python", "script.py"])
266 		['python', 'script.py']
267 
268 		&gt;&gt;&gt; checkCovCommand(["coverage", "script.py"])  # missing 'run'
Expected:
    ['coverage', 'run', '-p', '--context=Integration', '--source=multicast', 'script.py']
Got:
    ['exit 1 ; #', 'run', '-p', '--context=Integration', '--source=multicast', 'script.py']

.../multicast/tests/context.py:268: DocTestFailure
tests.context tests.context.checkCovCommand
Stack Traces | 0.004s run time
259 		args (list): A list of command arguments, defaulting to [None].
260 
261 	Returns:
262 		list: The modified list of arguments with 'coverage run' options added as applicable.
263 
264 	Examples:
265 		&gt;&gt;&gt; checkCovCommand(["python", "script.py"])
266 		['python', 'script.py']
267 
268 		&gt;&gt;&gt; checkCovCommand(["coverage", "script.py"])  # missing 'run'
Expected:
    ['coverage', 'run', '-p', '--context=Integration', '--source=multicast', 'script.py']
Got:
    ['exit 1 ; #', 'run', '-p', '--context=Integration', '--source=multicast', 'script.py']

.../multicast/tests/context.py:268: DocTestFailure
tests.context tests.context.checkCovCommand
Stack Traces | 0.005s run time
259 		args (list): A list of command arguments, defaulting to [None].
260 
261 	Returns:
262 		list: The modified list of arguments with 'coverage run' options added as applicable.
263 
264 	Examples:
265 		&gt;&gt;&gt; checkCovCommand(["python", "script.py"])
266 		['python', 'script.py']
267 
268 		&gt;&gt;&gt; checkCovCommand(["coverage", "script.py"])  # missing 'run'
Expected:
    ['coverage', 'run', '-p', '--context=Integration', '--source=multicast', 'script.py']
Got:
    ['exit 1 ; #', 'run', '-p', '--context=Integration', '--source=multicast', 'script.py']

.../multicast/tests/context.py:268: DocTestFailure

To view individual test run time comparison to the main branch, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file multicast/__main__.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/hear.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/recv.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/send.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file multicast/skt.py:
 Unknown Changes
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2024 03:53
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
multicast/__main__.py (1)

434-436: Rename the method and add a docstring.

The purpose of the _help_deamon_dispatch method is not clear from its name and implementation. Consider renaming the method to a more descriptive name that conveys its intent. Additionally, add a docstring to explain the purpose and behavior of the method.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a7719b and e2eff3e.

Files selected for processing (10)
  • .coveragerc (1 hunks)
  • multicast/init.py (7 hunks)
  • multicast/main.py (14 hunks)
  • multicast/hear.py (4 hunks)
  • multicast/recv.py (6 hunks)
  • multicast/send.py (5 hunks)
  • multicast/skt.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/MulticastUDPClient.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/context.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_usage.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • multicast/init.py
  • multicast/hear.py
  • multicast/skt.py
  • tests/MulticastUDPClient.py
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
multicast/send.py (1)

Pattern multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
multicast/recv.py (1)

Pattern multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
multicast/__main__.py (1)

Pattern multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
tests/context.py (1)

Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
  5. As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
tests/test_usage.py (1)

Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
  5. As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
Ruff
multicast/__main__.py

62-62: Undefined name McastNope.NoOp in __all__

(F822)


82-82: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)

Additional comments not posted (27)
.coveragerc (1)

42-42: LGTM!

The addition of the skipcq: PYL- line under the partial_branches section is a valid configuration change. It allows the coverage tool to skip certain Pylint warnings, providing more flexibility in ignoring specific code quality checks that may not be relevant for the current project or testing context.

multicast/send.py (6)

69-69: LGTM!

The __package__ variable is correctly defined, and the accompanying docstring is well-structured with relevant test cases.


141-141: LGTM!

The relative imports are correctly implemented and follow the PEP 8 style guide. The try-except block is a good practice to handle import errors gracefully.

Also applies to: 151-154


251-277: LGTM!

The new test cases in the docstring of the setupArgs method are well-structured and cover an important edge case. They follow the doctest format and are easy to understand.


288-289: LGTM!

Changing the _sayStep method to a static method is appropriate since it doesn't use any instance variables or methods. The change improves the code organization and clarity.


303-305: LGTM!

Using kwargs.get() in the doStep method simplifies the logic and enhances readability by reducing the need for explicit key checks. The change is a good improvement to the code.


Line range hint 1-305: Overall, the code in this file is of high quality and follows best practices.

The docstrings and comments provide clear explanations of the purpose and usage of the code. The code follows the PEP 8 style guide and is well-organized. The test cases in the docstrings provide good coverage of the functionality.

Great job on the improvements made in this pull request!

multicast/recv.py (13)

106-106: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


155-155: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


178-178: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


188-188: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


189-189: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


190-190: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


191-191: LGTM!

The comment is correctly used to suppress the linting warning without altering the functionality.


466-466: LGTM!

Converting the _hearstep method to a static method is a good change that improves its usability without altering its core functionality.


467-467: LGTM!

Converting the _hearstep method to a static method is a good change that improves its usability without altering its core functionality.


496-496: LGTM!

Updating the return type in the doctests to reflect the conversion of _hearstep to a static method is a good change that improves the clarity and accuracy of the documentation.


519-519: LGTM!

Refactoring the doStep method to utilize kwargs.get() for retrieving the groups parameter is a good change that simplifies the code and enhances readability without altering its core functionality.


520-522: LGTM!

Refactoring the doStep method to utilize kwargs.get() for retrieving the port, iface, and group parameters is a good change that simplifies the code and enhances readability without altering its core functionality.


524-524: LGTM!

Refactoring the doStep method to utilize kwargs.get() for retrieving the is_std parameter is a good change that simplifies the code and enhances readability without altering its core functionality.

multicast/__main__.py (3)

222-257: LGTM!

Moving the NoOp function into the McastNope class as a static method is a good refactoring decision to encapsulate the functionality within the class context. The function implementation, docstring, and tests look correct.


Line range hint 333-409: LGTM!

The setupArgs method of the McastRecvHearDispatch class is well-implemented. The method sets up the necessary command-line arguments for the class. The docstring and tests provide good coverage.


476-477: LGTM!

The useTool static method in the McastDispatch class is well-implemented. The method handles launching the actual task functions, and the docstring provides a brief explanation of its purpose.

tests/context.py (2)

392-392: LGTM!

The change from is to == enhances the correctness of the conditional, as is checks for object identity, while == checks for value equality. The adjustment ensures that the function correctly identifies when args is either None or a list containing a single None element, thereby refining the control flow and potentially preventing unintended behavior in scenarios where args is a list.


419-419: LGTM!

The change from is to == enhances the correctness of the conditional, as is checks for object identity, while == checks for value equality. The adjustment ensures that the function correctly identifies when args is either None or a list containing a single None element, thereby refining the control flow and potentially preventing unintended behavior in scenarios where args is a list.

tests/test_usage.py (2)

138-139: Great job adding these assertions!

The new assertions enhance the test's validation of the useTool method's output when provided with invalid input values:

  • Checking that test_code is a boolean (True) ensures the method returns the expected type.
  • Verifying that test_fixture is None confirms the method doesn't return any unexpected data.

These assertions improve the robustness and clarity of the test by explicitly validating the types and values of the outputs. They help catch potential issues in the useTool implementation and make the test's expectations clearer.


Line range hint 1-1: No changes found in test_hear_works_WHEN_say_works function.

This function was reviewed as part of the pull request, but no modifications were made to it. The existing test for the basic send and receive functionality using 'SAY' and 'HEAR' commands remains unchanged.

LGTM!
There is little reason to export it now that is moved into the class. Let's test it out.

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration Tooling Linter Any linter tool or setting file enhancements Multicast Any main project file changes Python Lang Changes to Python source code Testing Something can be verified
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pylint linter complained again
1 participant