Title: Update documentation for API endpoints and usage examples #132
Conversation
… -) Changes in file multicast/hear.py: - possible workaround added Changes in file multicast/recv.py: - possible workaround added Changes in file tests/test_usage.py: - possible workaround added
reactive-firewall
added
Duplicate
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on modifying import statements across multiple files, specifically in Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
Multicast
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
multicast/hear.py (3)
175-177: LGTM! Consider documenting the suppressed warnings.The addition of
skipcqcomments to suppress linting warnings aligns with the project's focus on cross-Python compatibility. However, it would be beneficial to document why these specific warnings are being suppressed.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the reason for suppressing each warning. For example:
# skipcq: PYL-C0414 - Suppressed to maintain compatibility across Python versions from . import recv as recvThis documentation will help future maintainers understand the rationale behind these suppressions.
179-181: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling.The changes improve error handling and module importing. Deleting the
importErrvariable is a good practice for cleaning up potential error leaks.Consider logging the import error before deleting it. This can help with debugging if issues arise. For example:
except Exception as importErr: print(f"Import error occurred: {importErr}", file=sys.stderr) del importErr # skipcq - cleanup any error leaks earlyThis addition would provide more information for troubleshooting while maintaining the cleanup of error leaks.
Line range hint
1-365: Overall, the changes improve cross-Python compatibility and error handling.The modifications in this file, primarily the addition of
skipcqcomments and improved exception handling, align well with the project's focus on portability across different Python versions. However, there are a few areas where additional documentation would be beneficial:
- Consider adding brief comments explaining the rationale behind suppressed warnings.
- Enhance error logging to aid in debugging while maintaining clean error handling.
- Provide context for accessing protected members, and consider refactoring if possible.
These improvements will help maintain the balance between portability and code clarity, making the codebase more maintainable in the long run.
To further improve the codebase:
- Consider creating a custom linter configuration file (e.g.,
.pylintrc) to manage project-wide linting rules. This can help reduce the need for inlineskipcqcomments.- Document the cross-Python compatibility requirements in the project's README or a separate COMPATIBILITY.md file. This will help future contributors understand the reasons behind certain coding decisions.
- If accessing protected members is a common pattern in the project, consider creating a public API that encapsulates these accesses, improving the overall design and reducing the need for warning suppressions.
multicast/recv.py (3)
180-187: LGTM. Consider adding an explanatory comment.The changes to the import logic improve the robustness of the module loading. However, it would be beneficial to add a brief comment explaining why this particular import structure is necessary (e.g., to handle potential circular imports).
Consider adding a comment like:
# Handle potential circular imports and ensure multicast module is always available
Line range hint
228-275: Add a comprehensive docstring to thejoinstepfunction.While the function implementation looks correct, it lacks a proper docstring. Adding a comprehensive docstring would improve code clarity and align with the project's coding guidelines.
Consider adding a docstring like this:
def joinstep(groups, port, iface=None, bind_group=None, isock=None): """ Join the given multicast group(s) and set up a socket for listening. Args: groups (list): List of multicast groups to join. port (int): Port number to bind the socket to. iface (str, optional): Interface to use for joining the groups. Defaults to None. bind_group (str, optional): Specific group to bind to. Defaults to None. isock (socket, optional): Existing socket to use. If None, a new socket is created. Returns: socket.socket: A socket configured for multicast reception. Raises: NotImplementedError: If there's an error during socket setup. """
Line range hint
471-487: Add a docstring to thedoStepmethod.The
doStepmethod lacks a docstring. Adding one would improve code clarity and maintainability.Consider adding a docstring like this:
def doStep(self, *args, **kwargs): """ Perform a single step of multicast reception. Args: *args: Variable length argument list. **kwargs: Arbitrary keyword arguments. - groups (list): List of multicast groups to join. - port (int): Port number to use. - iface (str, optional): Interface to use. - group (str): Multicast group to bind to. - is_std (bool): Flag to indicate if output should be printed to stdout. Returns: tuple: A tuple containing: - bool: True if a message was received, False otherwise. - str or None: The received message if any, None otherwise. """The overall implementation of the
McastRECVclass looks good and follows the project's structure.tests/test_usage.py (1)
481-481: LGTM: More polymorphic superclass call, but consider using super() without arguments.The change to use
super(self.__class__, self).setUp()is more polymorphic and flexible. However, in Python 3, you can simply usesuper().setUp(), which is cleaner and achieves the same result. This change is good, but could be further improved.Consider updating the line to:
- super(self.__class__, self).setUp() # skipcq: PYL-E1003 - this is more polymorphic + super().setUp() # More concise and equally polymorphic in Python 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- multicast/hear.py (1 hunks)
- multicast/recv.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_usage.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
multicast/hear.py (1)
Pattern
multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
multicast/recv.py (1)
Pattern
multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
tests/test_usage.py (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
- As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments not posted (5)
multicast/hear.py (1)
Line range hint
312-312: LGTM! Please clarify the use of the protected member.The addition of the
skipcqcomment to suppress the warning about accessing a protected member (_sayStep) is noted. While this aligns with the project's focus on portability, it's important to ensure that accessing protected members is necessary and doesn't violate encapsulation principles.Could you please provide more context on why it's necessary to access the
_sayStepmethod directly? If possible, consider refactoring to use a public method instead. If refactoring is not feasible, please add a comment explaining why accessing this protected member is required.To verify the usage of
_sayStepacross the codebase, you can run the following command:This will help us understand if this is an isolated case or a pattern throughout the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Protected Member Usage Verified
The usage of the protected member
_sayStepis confined to the following locations:
multicast/hear.py: send.McastSAY()._sayStep( # skipcq: PYL-W0212 - module okmulticast/send.py: def _sayStep(group, port, data):This controlled access within the
multicastmodule is acceptable. However, consider adding comments to clarify why accessing this protected member is necessary to maintain code clarity and uphold encapsulation principles.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of _sayStep method rg --type python '_sayStep'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of _sayStep method in Python files rg '_sayStep' -g '*.py'Length of output: 197
multicast/recv.py (1)
Line range hint
1-487: Overall, the changes and implementation look good.The modifications to the import logic improve the robustness of the module. The
McastRECVclass and its methods are well-structured. Consider implementing the suggested docstring additions to enhance code clarity and maintainability. These improvements will align the code more closely with the project's coding guidelines, particularly regarding documentation of functions and methods.tests/test_usage.py (3)
Line range hint
1-66: LGTM: Imports and file-level documentation are well-structured.The file starts with proper shebang, encoding declaration, and license information. The imports are wrapped in try-except blocks for robust error handling, which is a good practice. The file-level docstring provides clear information about the tests and includes doctests, enhancing the overall documentation.
Line range hint
69-420: LGTM: MulticastTestSuite provides comprehensive test coverage.The MulticastTestSuite class extends context.BasicUsageTestSuite and provides a wide range of test cases covering various aspects of the multicast module. Each test method is well-documented and follows a consistent structure, which enhances readability and maintainability. The inclusion of a static method for generating random port numbers (
_always_generate_random_port_WHEN_called) is a good practice for test isolation.
Line range hint
423-720: LGTM: BasicIntegrationTestSuite provides thorough integration testing.The BasicIntegrationTestSuite class extends context.BasicUsageTestSuite and offers a comprehensive set of integration tests for the multicast module. Each test method is well-documented and covers different aspects of the module's functionality, including CLI behavior, version information, and error handling. The use of subprocess for executing Python commands in tests is appropriate for integration testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
multicast/hear.py (2)
181-181: LGTM with a suggestion: Review cyclic import structureThe added comments to suppress cyclic import warnings are in line with the project's guideline to prioritize portability. However, cyclic imports can lead to potential issues in larger codebases.
Consider reviewing the overall import structure to see if the cyclic import can be eliminated through refactoring. If not possible, document the reason for the cyclic import in a comment for future maintainers.
Line range hint
1-365: Add docstrings to undocumented methodsSeveral methods in the classes lack docstrings. According to the project's coding guidelines, undocumented function definitions and class definitions are assumed incomplete. Consider adding short summary docstrings to the following methods:
In
McastServerclass:
server_activateopen_for_requestserver_bindclose_requesthandle_errorIn
MyUDPHandlerclass:
handleIn
HearUDPHandlerclass:
handleIn
McastHEARclass:
setupArgsdoStepAdding these docstrings will improve code documentation and maintainability.
multicast/recv.py (3)
Line range hint
223-280: Enhance docstring with parameter descriptionsThe
joinstepfunction would benefit from having parameter descriptions in its docstring. This would improve code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand and use the function correctly.Consider adding parameter descriptions to the docstring. For example:
def joinstep(groups, port, iface=None, bind_group=None, isock=None): """Will join the given multicast group(s). The JOIN function. Will start to listen on the given port of an interface for multicast messages to the given group(s). Args: groups (list): List of multicast groups to join. port (int): Port number to listen on. iface (str, optional): Interface to use for listening. Defaults to None. bind_group (str, optional): Group to bind to. Defaults to None. isock (socket, optional): Existing socket to use. If None, a new socket will be created. Returns: socket: The socket joined to the multicast group(s). Raises: NotImplementedError: If joining the group fails. """
Line range hint
391-441: Consider adding type hints tosetupArgsmethodTo improve code clarity and enable better static type checking, consider adding type hints to the
setupArgsmethod. This would make the expected input and output types more explicit.Here's an example of how you could add type hints:
from argparse import ArgumentParser @classmethod def setupArgs(cls, parser: ArgumentParser) -> None: """Will attempt add send args.""" # ... rest of the method implementation ...This change would make it clear that the method expects an
ArgumentParserobject and doesn't return anything.
Line range hint
443-487: Enhance error handling in_hearstepmethodThe
_hearstepmethod could benefit from more robust error handling. Currently, it doesn't explicitly handle potential exceptions that might be raised byjoinsteporrecvstep.Consider wrapping the main logic in a try-except block to handle potential exceptions more gracefully. For example:
@staticmethod def _hearstep(groups, port, iface=None, bind_group=None): try: sock = joinstep(groups, port, iface, bind_group, None) msgbuffer = str(multicast._BLANK) chunk = None msgbuffer = recvstep(msgbuffer, chunk, sock) return msgbuffer except Exception as e: # Log the error or handle it appropriately print(f"Error in _hearstep: {str(e)}") return str(multicast._BLANK) # or handle the error case as neededThis change would make the method more robust and easier to debug in case of failures.
tests/test_usage.py (2)
Line range hint
68-420: Consider refactoring test methods for improved maintainability.The MulticastTestSuite is comprehensive and covers various aspects of the multicast module. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
Some test methods, like
test_hear_works_WHEN_say_works, are quite long. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused tests for better readability and maintainability.There's some code duplication in error handling across test methods. You could create a helper method to handle common error scenarios and reduce duplication.
The use of static port numbers (e.g., 59991, 59992) in test fixtures could lead to test interdependence. Consider using the
_always_generate_random_port_WHEN_calledmethod more consistently across tests to ensure test isolation.Here's an example of how you could refactor the
test_hear_works_WHEN_say_worksmethod:def test_hear_works_WHEN_say_works(self): """Tests the basic send and recv test""" port = self._always_generate_random_port_WHEN_called() say_args, hear_args = self._prepare_say_hear_args(port) with self._start_hear_process(hear_args) as p: self._send_multiple_messages(say_args) self._assert_process_exit_code(p) def _prepare_say_hear_args(self, port): say_args = [ "--port", str(port), "--mcast-group", "'224.0.0.1'", "--message", "'test message'" ] hear_args = [ "--port", str(port), "--join-mcast-groups", "'224.0.0.1'", "--bind-group", "'224.0.0.1'" ] return say_args, hear_args def _start_hear_process(self, hear_args): return Process( target=multicast.__main__.McastDispatch().doStep, name="HEAR", args=("HEAR", hear_args,) ) def _send_multiple_messages(self, say_args): for _ in range(3): self.assertIsNotNone( multicast.__main__.McastDispatch().doStep("SAY", say_args) ) def _assert_process_exit_code(self, process): self.assertIsNotNone(process.exitcode) self.assertEqual(int(process.exitcode), int(0))This refactoring improves readability, reduces duplication, and makes the test more maintainable.
Line range hint
422-481: Consider refactoring test methods and updating string formatting.The BasicIntegrationTestSuite is well-structured and covers various aspects of the multicast module's CLI. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
Some test methods, like
test_prints_usage_WHEN_called_GIVEN_cmd_and_help_argument, are quite long. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused tests for better readability and maintainability.There's some code duplication across test methods, particularly in the loops for testing different cases. You could create helper methods to reduce this duplication.
The use of string formatting could be updated to use f-strings for better readability, especially in Python 3.6+.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the
test_prints_usage_WHEN_called_GIVEN_cmd_and_help_argumentmethod:def test_prints_usage_WHEN_called_GIVEN_cmd_and_help_argument(self): """Test case for multicast HEAR|RECV|SAY help.""" for test_case in [".__main__", ""]: with self.subTest(test_case=test_case): self._assert_help_output(test_case) def _assert_help_output(self, test_case): args = [ str(self._thepython), "-m", f"multicast{test_case}", "--help" ] output = context.checkPythonCommand(args, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT) self.assertIn("usage:", output)This refactoring improves readability, reduces duplication, and makes use of f-strings for better formatting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- multicast/hear.py (1 hunks)
- multicast/recv.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_usage.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
multicast/hear.py (1)
Pattern
multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
multicast/recv.py (1)
Pattern
multicast/*.py: When reviewing code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as doc-strings when reviewing.
tests/test_usage.py (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
- As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments not posted (9)
multicast/hear.py (3)
175-177: LGTM: Linting suppressions addedThe added comments to suppress specific linting warnings are appropriate. These changes align with the project's guideline to prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility.
180-181: LGTM: Improved error handlingThe addition of the cleanup step to delete the
importErrvariable is a good practice. It helps prevent potential error leaks and aligns with good coding practices. The 'skipcq' comment indicates that this change is also related to code quality checks.
Line range hint
1-365: Overall review summaryThe changes in this file primarily involve adding comments for linting purposes and improving error handling. These modifications align well with the project's coding guidelines, particularly the emphasis on portability over clarity.
Key points:
- Linting suppressions have been added to import statements.
- Error handling has been improved with a cleanup step.
- A cyclic import warning has been suppressed, but it's recommended to review the import structure.
Recommendation:
- Add docstrings to undocumented methods to improve code documentation and maintainability.
The changes don't introduce any significant functional modifications and generally improve the code quality. Good job on addressing linting issues while maintaining the code's functionality.
multicast/recv.py (3)
180-180: LGTM: Appropriate use of code quality directiveThe addition of the
# skipcqcomment is a good practice for explicitly instructing code quality tools to skip this line. This is particularly useful for handling cyclic imports, which are sometimes necessary but may trigger warnings from static analysis tools.
187-187: LGTM: Proper use of code quality directive in exception handlingThe addition of the
# skipcqcomment here is appropriate. It ensures that code quality tools don't raise warnings for this necessary fallback import within the exception handling block. This approach maintains code quality while allowing for robust error handling.
Line range hint
1-487: Overall, well-structured code with room for minor improvementsThe
multicast/recv.pyfile is well-organized and implements the multicast receiving functionality effectively. The recent changes addingskipcqcomments are appropriate and help manage code quality tool behavior.To further enhance the code:
- Consider adding parameter descriptions to function docstrings, especially for complex functions like
joinstep.- Add type hints to method signatures, particularly in the
McastRECVclass methods.- Enhance error handling in methods like
_hearstepto make the code more robust.These improvements would make the code more maintainable, easier to understand, and less prone to errors.
tests/test_usage.py (3)
Line range hint
1-66: LGTM: Imports and file-level documentation are well-structured.The file starts with appropriate shebang, encoding declaration, and license information. The imports are wrapped in try-except blocks, which is a good practice for handling potential import errors. The file-level docstring provides clear information about the tests and includes doctests, which is helpful for understanding the module's usage.
481-481: LGTM: Improved polymorphism in setUp method.The change in the setUp method to use
super(self.__class__, self).setUp()instead ofsuper().setUp()is a good improvement for polymorphism. This change allows for better compatibility with different Python versions and more complex inheritance scenarios.
Line range hint
1-728: Overall, the test file is comprehensive and well-structured.The
tests/test_usage.pyfile provides thorough test coverage for the multicast module, including both the MulticastTestSuite and BasicIntegrationTestSuite. The tests cover a wide range of scenarios and edge cases, which is commendable.While there are opportunities for improvement in terms of code organization, reducing duplication, and updating some Python practices, the overall quality and coverage of the tests are good. Implementing the suggested refactorings will enhance maintainability and readability without compromising the test coverage or functionality.
Great job on creating such a comprehensive test suite!
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #132 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 97.158% 97.158%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 387 387
Branches 35 35
=========================================
Hits 376 376
Misses 7 7
Partials 4 4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests
setUpmethod in the test suite for better polymorphism while maintaining existing functionality.