Skip to content

[TESTS] Testing possible fix for PYL-C0414 #83

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Collaborator

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 11, 2024

ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/init.py:

  • minor improvement to docstrings

Changes in file tests/context.py:

Changes in file tests/profiling.py:

  • some improvement to docstrings
  • synced with template source from reactive-firewall/python-repo

Changes in file tests/test_basic.py:

Changes in file tests/test_usage.py:


Relevant Issues:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added a module-level docstring to clarify the purpose of the multicast testing module.
  • Code Improvements

    • Enhanced error handling for module imports, providing more informative error messages.
    • Simplified import statements by removing unnecessary aliasing for clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated import logic to prevent unnecessary imports and improve module loading efficiency.

### ChangeLog:

Changes in file tests/__init__.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file tests/context.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file tests/profiling.py:
 def checkpoint(self, name=''):
 def do_cprofile(func):
 def do_time_profile(func, timer_name="time_profile"):

Changes in file tests/test_basic.py:
 Unknown Changes

Changes in file tests/test_usage.py:
 Unknown Changes
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added this to the DRY/AHA Refactor milestone Sep 11, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Sep 11, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall linked an issue Sep 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to import statements and documentation across several files within the tests directory. Key changes involve the removal of unnecessary aliasing for imports, the addition of module-level docstrings, and enhancements to error handling in import logic. These adjustments aim to improve code clarity and maintain coding standards.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tests/__init__.py Added a module-level docstring and modified an import statement to include a linting comment.
tests/context.py Updated import statements with linting comments and specified the namespace for profiling.
tests/profiling.py Improved error handling for imports and refined docstrings for existing functions.
tests/test_basic.py Simplified the import statement for unittest by removing unnecessary aliasing.
tests/test_usage.py Removed redundant aliasing for the multicast import from context.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant A as User
    participant B as Tests
    participant C as Context

    A->>B: Run tests
    B->>C: Import necessary modules
    C-->>B: Provide modules
    B-->>A: Execute tests
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
PYL-C0414 suggestion from deepsource needs tested (ie import without alias) (#81)
find documentation that is relevant No relevant documentation found.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Linter, Documentation

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code does play,
Imports now dance in a clearer way.
No more aliases, just pure delight,
Testing's now easier, all feels right!
With docstrings added, clarity shines,
Hopping through changes, our code aligns! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Python Lang Changes to Python source code Testing Something can be verified CI Continuous Integration Tooling labels Sep 11, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 22:48
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.073%. Comparing base (c009b87) to head (ff5a77e).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #83   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   96.073%   96.073%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          382       382           
  Branches        30        30           
=========================================
  Hits           367       367           
  Misses           9         9           
  Partials         6         6           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 95.979% <ø> (ø)
3.11 95.979% <ø> (ø)
3.12 95.979% <ø> (ø)
3.7 86.207% <ø> (ø)
3.8 86.167% <ø> (ø)
3.9 86.167% <ø> (ø)
macos-13 87.435% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest 95.979% <ø> (ø)
multicast 96.073% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest 96.073% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest 84.031% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c009b87...ff5a77e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c009b87 and ff5a77e.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • tests/init.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/context.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/profiling.py (4 hunks)
  • tests/test_basic.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_usage.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • tests/init.py
  • tests/context.py
  • tests/test_basic.py
  • tests/test_usage.py
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
tests/profiling.py (1)

Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
  5. As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
Ruff
tests/profiling.py

45-45: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


58-58: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


71-71: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


83-83: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


96-96: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


104-104: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


110-110: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Thank you for the request to summarize the findings on the import ... as ... syntax in Python. Here's a summary of the official Python documentation from versions 2.7 through 3.12, along with the relevant links:

  1. Consistency across versions:
    The import ... as ... syntax has remained consistent and supported from Python 2.7 through 3.12.

  2. Basic syntax:
    The general form of the import statement with the as clause is:

    import module [as name]

    or

    from module import identifier [as name]
  3. Purpose and functionality:

  4. Examples of usage:

    import foo.bar.baz as fbb
    from foo import attr as attribute
  5. Evolution and additions:

  6. Compatibility notes:

  7. Best practices:

This summary provides an overview of the import ... as ... syntax across Python versions, highlighting its consistency and importance in managing imports and namespace organization in Python programs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration Tooling Python Lang Changes to Python source code Testing Something can be verified
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PYL-C0414 test without alias and find documentation that is relevent
1 participant