Skip to content

Move pkg/gzipfs to internal/gzipfs #6897

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 22, 2025

Conversation

sAchin-680
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Moved pkg/gzipfs/ to internal/gzipfs/
  • Updated all imports referencing pkg/gzipfs/ to internal/gzipfs/

How was this change tested?

Checklist

@sAchin-680 sAchin-680 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2025 10:05
@sAchin-680 sAchin-680 requested a review from albertteoh March 22, 2025 10:05
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.18%. Comparing base (c1c6845) to head (ba073be).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6897      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.12%   96.18%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       19694    19694              
==========================================
+ Hits        18931    18942      +11     
+ Misses        577      569       -8     
+ Partials      186      183       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 10.21% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 2.12% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.36% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.11% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.11% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.36% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.11% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.11% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 20.12% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.21% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 20.38% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.12% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v1 11.28% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 8.25% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v1 10.51% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v2 2.12% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 2.12% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.26% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.26% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.12% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor 0.57% <ø> (ø)
unittests 94.93% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:refactoring Internal code refactoring without functional changes label Mar 22, 2025
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit beeff69 Mar 22, 2025
56 of 57 checks passed
Manik2708 pushed a commit to Manik2708/jaeger that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2025
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- **Resolves** jaegertracing#6869

## Description of the changes
- Moved `pkg/gzipfs/` to `internal/gzipfs/`  
- Updated all imports referencing `pkg/gzipfs/` to `internal/gzipfs/`

## How was this change tested?
- 

## Checklist
- [ ] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [ ] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [ ] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: sAchin-680 <[email protected]>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- **Resolves** jaegertracing#6869

## Description of the changes
- Moved `pkg/gzipfs/` to `internal/gzipfs/`  
- Updated all imports referencing `pkg/gzipfs/` to `internal/gzipfs/`

## How was this change tested?
- 

## Checklist
- [ ] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [ ] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [ ] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: sAchin-680 <[email protected]>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- **Resolves** jaegertracing#6869

## Description of the changes
- Moved `pkg/gzipfs/` to `internal/gzipfs/`
- Updated all imports referencing `pkg/gzipfs/` to `internal/gzipfs/`

## How was this change tested?
-

## Checklist
- [ ] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [ ] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [ ] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: sAchin-680 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:refactoring Internal code refactoring without functional changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants