Skip to content

Conversation

@intgr
Copy link
Collaborator

@intgr intgr commented Dec 15, 2025

No description provided.

@intgr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

intgr commented Dec 15, 2025

Ah, Renovate didn't change Python versions used in test matrix, will update that as well

Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would put it like this. Because now we already have some parts of 6.0 and we can't claim to support 5.2, because it will allow code that does not work on 5.2 :(

But, some more work is required to support 6.0 to claim it


| django-stubs | Mypy version | Django version | Django partial support | Python version |
|----------------|--------------|----------------|------------------------|----------------|
| (unreleased) | 1.13 - 1.19 | 5.2 | 6.0, 5.1, 5.0 | 3.10 - 3.14 |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| (unreleased) | 1.13 - 1.19 | 5.2 | 6.0, 5.1, 5.0 | 3.10 - 3.14 |
| (unreleased) | 1.13 - 1.19 | 6.0 | 5.2, 5.1, 5.0 | 3.10 - 3.14 |

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we're still closer to 5.2 than we are to fully supporting 6.0, for now.

I'd like to make a release at one point, to put out the "announcement" #2944 to perhaps get more help from the community.

But it's also an option to make a release from a branch, excluding all 6.0 changes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be ideal to make a release with 5.2 and 3.14 as the last 5.2 release and then move on to 6.0 changes. And make the announcement. But, this will require a new branch with manual cherry-picking of commits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants