Skip to content

Conversation

@prayagverma
Copy link
Contributor

I am not a lawyer but according to http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf (See screenshot of relevant section below), mentioning the first year of publication in the copyright is a good thing

selection_008

Mentioning 2010 as the first release happened at that time - https://github.com/tj/git-extras/releases/tag/0.0.1

Also adding Contributors to copyright because TJ Holowaychuk is not the only person owning copyright for the whole project. The copyright is collectively owned by all contributors, or more precisely: every contributor owns a copyright on the code he or she has contributed.

The only way to retain full copyright over code is to ask for signing contributor's agreement before merging in changes. This is, in fact, what some companies who license commercially their free software do.

@qw3rtman
Copy link
Collaborator

@hemanth, thoughts on this? Makes sense to me but you've been a maintainer longer than I have, so I wanted to confirm.

@hemanth
Copy link
Collaborator

hemanth commented Jan 30, 2016

Yup it's absolutely right.

As per the second point only 2010 must be sufficient.

CLA for this project will be little too much.

I am sure @tj wouldn't mind to have contributors in the copyright, given that he has handed over even larger projects like express to the FOSS world, he wouldn't mind about this change.

I am not a lawyer but according to http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf (See screenshot of relevant section below), mentioning the first year of publication in the copyright is a good thing

![selection_008](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/829526/12409934/7021c3a6-be95-11e5-8d1a-18f6948571e0.png)

Mentioning 2010 as the first release happened at that time - https://github.com/tj/git-extras/releases/tag/0.0.1

Also adding `Contributors` to copyright because TJ Holowaychuk is not the only person owning copyright for the whole project. The copyright is collectively owned by all contributors, or more precisely: every contributor owns a copyright on the code he or she has contributed.

The only way to retain full copyright over code is to ask for signing contributor's agreement before merging in changes. This is, in fact, what some companies who license commercially their free software do.
@prayagverma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated the pull request to mention 2010 alone (removed the year range)

@tj
Copy link
Owner

tj commented Jan 30, 2016

👍

hemanth added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2016
Mention initial copyright year and add contributors to copyright
@hemanth hemanth merged commit ac0b5fe into tj:master Jan 30, 2016
@hemanth
Copy link
Collaborator

hemanth commented Jan 30, 2016

@pra85 Thanks, just tweeted about it.

tardypad pushed a commit to tardypad/git-extras that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2016
Mention initial copyright year and add contributors to copyright
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants