Feature/UI #152
Feature/UI #152
Conversation
- 更新了按钮、输入框、分隔符、侧边栏等组件的代码格式，统一了引入方式。 - 在全局样式中添加了自定义变体和基础样式。 - 改进了侧边栏的状态管理和样式，增强了用户体验。 - 修复了多个组件中的小错误，确保更好的兼容性和可用性。 这些更改提升了代码的可读性和维护性，同时改善了用户界面的整体表现。
- 将Sidebar组件重命名为AppSidebar，并整合SidebarProvider以管理状态。 - 更新了MainLayout以使用新的AppSidebar结构，移除不必要的状态管理。 - 改进了TopNavigation组件，移除了搜索框相关代码，简化了结构。 - 更新了Sidebar和TopNavigation的测试用例，确保功能正常。 这些更改提升了组件的可维护性和用户体验。
- 将 searchParams 类型从对象更改为 Promise，以支持异步处理。 - 在 PromptForm 中，更新了输入框的错误状态处理，使用 aria-invalid 属性和动态类名来提升可访问性。 这些更改增强了组件的可维护性和用户体验。
- 将原Sidebar组件重命名为AppSidebar，整合了导航项和用户信息的展示。 - 新增了NavMain、NavQuickCreate、NavSecondary和NavUser组件，提升了代码的模块化和可维护性。 - 更新了MainLayout以使用新的AppSidebar结构，简化了状态管理。 - 移除了旧的Sidebar测试用例，并新增了针对AppSidebar的测试，确保功能正常。 这些更改提升了组件的可读性和用户体验。
- 引入新的导航项和用户信息展示，提升了组件的可读性和可维护性。 - 移除了旧的Sidebar相关组件，整合了功能到AppSidebar中。 - 更新了测试用例，确保新结构的功能正常。 这些更改改善了用户体验并简化了代码结构。
- 在多个组件中修改重定向路径，确保用户在完成设置或登录后能够正确访问内容库。 - 更新了相关测试用例，确保新重定向逻辑的有效性。 这些更改提升了用户体验，确保用户能够顺利访问内容库。
…样式，增加负边距以改善布局。这些更改旨在提升用户体验和界面的整洁性。
## Walkthrough
This update introduces a new `AppSidebar` component and replaces the previous sidebar and top navigation system with a provider-based sidebar architecture. The layout and UI are streamlined, with several redirects and UI elements updated to use `/content-library` instead of `/dashboard`. Related tests are refactored, removed, or added accordingly.
## Changes
| File(s) | Change Summary |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx, frontend/hooks/use-mobile.ts | New `AppSidebar` component and mobile detection hook introduced. |
| frontend/components/layout/MainLayout.tsx, frontend/components/layout/TopNavigation.tsx, frontend/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx | Sidebar and top navigation refactored: old components removed or replaced by `AppSidebar`. |
| frontend/__tests__/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx, frontend/__tests__/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx | New/updated tests for `AppSidebar` and `MainLayout`. |
| frontend/__tests__/components/layout/Sidebar.test.tsx | Old sidebar test removed. |
| frontend/__tests__/components/layout/TopNavigation.test.tsx | TopNavigation tests updated for refactored component. |
| frontend/app/content-library/page.tsx, frontend/app/setup/page.tsx, frontend/app/password-recovery/confirm/page.tsx, frontend/app/prompts/page.tsx, frontend/app/prompts/_components/PromptForm.tsx | UI and logic updated for new navigation, redirect, and input error handling. |
| frontend/components/actions/google-auth-action.ts, frontend/components/actions/items-action.ts, frontend/components/actions/login-action.ts, frontend/components/setup/SetupContent.tsx, frontend/hooks/useAuthRedirect.ts, frontend/middleware.ts | Redirects and middleware logic updated to use `/content-library` instead of `/dashboard`. |
| frontend/components/ui/button.tsx, frontend/components/ui/input.tsx, frontend/components/ui/separator.tsx, frontend/components/ui/sheet.tsx, frontend/components/ui/sidebar.tsx, frontend/components/ui/skeleton.tsx, frontend/components/ui/tooltip.tsx | UI components refactored for style, accessibility, and code consistency; input component simplified. |
| frontend/app/globals.css | Dark mode and base style enhancements. |
| frontend/package.json | Dependencies reordered/updated; new icon package added. |
| Makefile | Frontend lint target modified to set DEBUG environment variable to empty before linting. |
## Sequence Diagram(s)
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AppSidebar
participant SidebarProvider
participant AuthContext
participant Router
User->>AppSidebar: Interacts (e.g., click "Upload Content")
AppSidebar->>SidebarProvider: Uses context for sidebar state
AppSidebar->>AuthContext: Retrieves user info for display
AppSidebar->>Router: Navigates via sidebar links
AppSidebar-->>User: Updates UI and triggers callbacksPossibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
|
|
Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here. PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Review 🔍
|
|
Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here. PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
||||||||||||||
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
CI Feedback 🧐(Feedback updated until commit 19f2f98)A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/components/actions/items-action.ts (1)
248-363: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Verify no remaining dashboard references in the codebase.
The systematic route changes look correct, but let's ensure no "/dashboard" references remain that could cause broken navigation.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining references to "/dashboard" route that might need updating # Expected: No or minimal results that are intentionally kept (like old route handlers for redirects) echo "Searching for '/dashboard' references in the codebase..." rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!.git' -g '!dist' -g '!build' '"/dashboard"' --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\nSearching for 'dashboard' in route definitions..." rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!.git' -g '!dist' -g '!build' "route.*dashboard|dashboard.*route" --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 576
To work around ripgrep’s unsupported TSX file type in this environment, let’s switch to grep across all relevant extensions:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any "/dashboard" string in TS/JS files (including TSX/JSX) echo "Searching for '/dashboard' references in codebase..." grep -R '"/dashboard"' . \ --exclude-dir={node_modules,dist,build} \ --include='*.ts' \ --include='*.tsx' \ --include='*.js' \ --include='*.jsx' -n || true # Search for occurrences of "dashboard" in route definitions echo -e "\nSearching for 'dashboard' in route definitions..." grep -R -E 'route.*dashboard|dashboard.*route' . \ --exclude-dir={node_modules,dist,build} \ --include='*.ts' \ --include='*.tsx' \ --include='*.js' \ --include='*.jsx' -n || trueLength of output: 1367
Update Remaining “/dashboard” Route References
The route migration to remove “/dashboard” isn’t complete—there are still live code and test references that need updating to the new path (e.g.,
/content-libraryor your chosen landing route).Please update or remove these occurrences:
- frontend/app/login/google/callback/page.tsx:57
router.push("/dashboard");- frontend/app/password-recovery/page.tsx:54
router.push("/dashboard");- frontend/app/page.tsx:54
<Link href="/dashboard">…</Link>- frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx:45
url: "/dashboard",- Tests mocking
usePathnamein:
- frontend/tests/app/dashboard/PromptNavigation.test.tsx:21
usePathname: () => "/dashboard",- frontend/tests/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx:8
usePathname: () => "/dashboard",- frontend/tests/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx:45
(usePathname as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue("/dashboard");Ensure each reference points to the correct new route or is removed if obsolete.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 283-284: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 293-297: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
frontend/hooks/use-mobile.ts (1)
18-18: Improve return type consistency.Using
!!isMobileconvertsundefinedtofalse, but it would be clearer to handle the undefined case explicitly or use a more predictable type.- return !!isMobile + return isMobile ?? falsefrontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx (2)
10-10: Consider consolidating icon imports for better maintainability.The line imports many icons from
@tabler/icons-reactin a single line, which can become unwieldy as more icons are added. Consider importing them individually or grouping related icons.-import { IconCirclePlusFilled,IconHome,IconDashboard,IconTags,IconMessageChatbot,IconInnerShadowTop,IconUser } from "@tabler/icons-react"; +import { + IconCirclePlusFilled, + IconHome, + IconDashboard, + IconTags, + IconMessageChatbot, + IconInnerShadowTop, + IconUser +} from "@tabler/icons-react";
36-66: Extract navigation data to a configuration file.The navigation data is hardcoded within the component, making it less maintainable. Consider extracting it to a separate configuration file or constant.
Create a new file
@/config/navigation.ts:export const navigationConfig = { navMain: [ { title: "Content Library", url: "/content-library", icon: IconHome, }, // ... other items ], navSecondary: [ { title: "Settings", icon: Settings, }, ], };Then import and use it in the component:
+import { navigationConfig } from "@/config/navigation"; -const data = { - navMain: [ - // ... navigation items - ], - navSecondary: [ - // ... secondary items - ], -}; +const data = navigationConfig;frontend/__tests__/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx (7)
6-20: Consider making the route mock more flexible for comprehensive testing.The hardcoded
/dashboardpath limits testing different route scenarios. Consider parameterizing this for better test coverage.-// Mock Next.js router -jest.mock("next/navigation", () => ({ - usePathname: () => "/dashboard", -})); +// Mock Next.js router +const mockPathname = jest.fn(() => "/dashboard"); +jest.mock("next/navigation", () => ({ + usePathname: mockPathname, +}));This would allow you to test different active states by calling
mockPathname.mockReturnValue("/content-library")in individual tests.
51-58: Comprehensive navigation links testing.Good coverage of all expected navigation items. Consider adding href attribute verification for better link testing.
it("renders all navigation links", () => { renderSidebar(); - expect(screen.getByText("Dashboard")).toBeInTheDocument(); - expect(screen.getByText("Favorites")).toBeInTheDocument(); - expect(screen.getByText("Prompts")).toBeInTheDocument(); - expect(screen.getByText("Content Library")).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByRole("link", { name: "Dashboard" })).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByRole("link", { name: "Favorites" })).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByRole("link", { name: "Prompts" })).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByRole("link", { name: "Content Library" })).toBeInTheDocument(); });
60-65: Good active state testing, but could be more comprehensive.The test correctly verifies the active state for the current route. Consider testing multiple routes to ensure the active state logic works correctly for all navigation items.
67-72: Consider consolidating or removing redundant logo test.This test duplicates the branding verification already covered in the first test. Consider consolidating or making this test more specific to logo functionality.
95-103: Good interaction testing, but missing settings click test.This test properly verifies the upload content click handler. Consider adding a similar test for the settings click handler.
it("calls onSettingsClick when Settings button is clicked", () => { const { mockOnSettingsClick } = renderSidebar(); const settingsButton = screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Settings" }); fireEvent.click(settingsButton); expect(mockOnSettingsClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); });
105-116: Simplify complex button selection logic.The current approach to find the trigger button is overly complex. Consider using more specific selectors or test IDs.
it("renders sidebar trigger button", () => { renderSidebar(); - // Find all buttons with "Toggle Sidebar" name and filter for the one with data-sidebar="trigger" - const triggerButtons = screen.getAllByRole("button", { name: /toggle sidebar/i }); - const headerTrigger = triggerButtons.find(button => - button.getAttribute("data-sidebar") === "trigger" - ); - - expect(headerTrigger).toBeInTheDocument(); - expect(headerTrigger).toHaveAttribute("data-sidebar", "trigger"); + const triggerButton = screen.getByRole("button", { name: /toggle sidebar/i }); + expect(triggerButton).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(triggerButton).toHaveAttribute("data-sidebar", "trigger"); });
45-117: Consider adding tests for edge cases and accessibility.The current test suite covers the happy path well but could benefit from additional test cases:
- Different route active states: Test that other navigation items become active when the route changes
- User without avatar: Test the display when
avatar_urlis null- Accessibility: Test keyboard navigation and ARIA attributes
- Error states: Test behavior when auth hook returns no user
Would you like me to help generate additional test cases for these scenarios?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
frontend/__tests__/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/__tests__/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/__tests__/components/layout/Sidebar.test.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/__tests__/components/layout/TopNavigation.test.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/app/content-library/page.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/app/globals.css(2 hunks)frontend/app/password-recovery/confirm/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/app/prompts/_components/PromptForm.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/app/prompts/page.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/app/setup/page.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/components/actions/google-auth-action.ts(1 hunks)frontend/components/actions/items-action.ts(3 hunks)frontend/components/actions/login-action.ts(1 hunks)frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/components/layout/MainLayout.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/components/layout/TopNavigation.tsx(6 hunks)frontend/components/setup/SetupContent.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/components/ui/button.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/components/ui/input.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/components/ui/separator.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/components/ui/sheet.tsx(7 hunks)frontend/components/ui/sidebar.tsx(32 hunks)frontend/components/ui/skeleton.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/components/ui/tooltip.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/hooks/use-mobile.ts(1 hunks)frontend/hooks/useAuthRedirect.ts(2 hunks)frontend/middleware.ts(2 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- frontend/tests/components/layout/Sidebar.test.tsx
- frontend/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (5)
frontend/components/ui/skeleton.tsx (1)
frontend/lib/utils.ts (1)
cn(7-9)
frontend/components/ui/separator.tsx (1)
frontend/lib/utils.ts (1)
cn(7-9)
frontend/components/ui/button.tsx (1)
frontend/lib/utils.ts (1)
cn(7-9)
frontend/components/ui/sheet.tsx (1)
frontend/lib/utils.ts (1)
cn(7-9)
frontend/components/ui/input.tsx (1)
frontend/lib/utils.ts (1)
cn(7-9)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (4, 4)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (3, 4)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (1, 4)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (2, 4)
- GitHub Check: Complete CI/CD Pipeline
- GitHub Check: test-backend
- GitHub Check: test-docker-compose
🔇 Additional comments (44)
frontend/components/ui/skeleton.tsx (1)
1-1: Approve stylistic changes
The removal of trailing semicolons and JSDoc comments aligns with the project’s semicolon-free style. No functional or API changes were introduced.Also applies to: 10-10, 13-13
frontend/components/ui/tooltip.tsx (1)
1-1: Approve formatting adjustments
All edits are purely stylistic (removing semicolons, JSDoc comments, and reformatting JSX returns). Component logic and props remain unchanged.Also applies to: 3-4, 6-6, 18-18, 28-28, 34-34, 50-50, 58-58, 61-61
frontend/components/ui/sheet.tsx (1)
1-140: Approve formatting unification
This file has only had semicolons and comments removed and minor JSX reformatting. No behavior or prop signatures were altered.frontend/components/ui/separator.tsx (1)
1-29: Approve slot rename & formatting
Thedata-slotattribute is updated to"separator"for consistency with other UI components, and trailing semicolons/comments were removed. Ensure that any references or selectors for the oldseparator-rootare updated accordingly.frontend/components/ui/sidebar.tsx (1)
1-727: Approve styling overhaul
All changes in this file standardize the semicolon-free, comment-free formatting across the Sidebar components. There are no changes to logic, hooks, or public APIs.frontend/components/actions/login-action.ts (1)
93-94: LGTM! Post-login redirect updated correctly.The redirect destination has been appropriately updated from "/dashboard" to "/content-library" with a corresponding comment update. This aligns with the broader navigation refactoring.
frontend/components/actions/google-auth-action.ts (1)
47-48: LGTM! Google OAuth redirect aligned with login flow.The redirect destination has been consistently updated to "/content-library", maintaining uniformity across all authentication methods.
frontend/app/password-recovery/confirm/page.tsx (1)
29-32: LGTM! User redirect updated for consistency.The redirect for already authenticated users has been correctly updated to "/content-library", maintaining consistency with the new primary landing page.
frontend/components/actions/items-action.ts (3)
248-248: LGTM! Cache revalidation path updated correctly.The revalidatePath call has been updated to "/content-library" to ensure proper cache invalidation for the new route.
346-346: LGTM! Cache revalidation path updated consistently.The revalidatePath call maintains consistency with the removeItem function, ensuring proper cache invalidation.
362-363: LGTM! Post-addition redirect updated appropriately.The redirect destination and comment have been updated to reflect the new primary content page location.
frontend/__tests__/components/layout/TopNavigation.test.tsx (1)
25-26: LGTM! Test updated to match component refactoring.The test assertion has been updated to check for the "设置" (Settings) button, which aligns with the TopNavigation component simplification mentioned in the AI summary.
frontend/hooks/useAuthRedirect.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Consistent redirection path update.The changes correctly update the default post-authentication redirection from "/dashboard" to "/content-library" in both documentation and implementation. The logic flow remains intact.
Also applies to: 40-42
frontend/app/prompts/_components/PromptForm.tsx (1)
188-189: Excellent accessibility improvement!The refactoring from a custom
stateprop to standardaria-invalidattribute and conditional CSS classes is a great improvement. This approach:
- Follows web accessibility standards (WCAG)
- Uses semantic HTML attributes for screen readers
- Maintains visual error indication through conditional styling
- Aligns with modern React form practices
frontend/components/setup/SetupContent.tsx (1)
185-185: LGTM! Consistent redirection updates throughout setup flow.The changes properly update all references to the post-setup redirection destination:
- Documentation comments updated to reflect "/content-library" target
- Console logging updated for debugging consistency
- Router navigation updated to new destination
The core setup logic and error handling remain intact. These changes align with the broader navigation structure updates.
Also applies to: 239-239, 339-339, 344-345
frontend/app/setup/page.tsx (1)
10-10: LGTM! Completes the coordinated navigation update.The changes correctly update the setup page redirection logic:
- JSDoc documentation reflects the new destination
- Inline comments accurately describe the updated flow
- Redirect call properly routes to "/content-library"
The authentication logic remains sound and this completes the consistent navigation structure update across the application.
Also applies to: 22-22, 26-26
frontend/hooks/use-mobile.ts (2)
9-11:⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent breakpoint logic.
There's an inconsistency between the media query breakpoint and the onChange handler:
- Media query uses
max-width: ${MOBILE_BREAKPOINT - 1}px(767px)- onChange uses
window.innerWidth < MOBILE_BREAKPOINT(768px)This could cause the media query listener and the direct width check to have different results.
- const mql = window.matchMedia(`(max-width: ${MOBILE_BREAKPOINT - 1}px)`) + const mql = window.matchMedia(`(max-width: ${MOBILE_BREAKPOINT - 1}px)`) const onChange = () => { - setIsMobile(window.innerWidth < MOBILE_BREAKPOINT) + setIsMobile(window.innerWidth <= MOBILE_BREAKPOINT - 1) }Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
6-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider SSR-compatible initial state.
The initial state of
undefinedmay cause hydration mismatches in SSR environments since the server can't determine the viewport size.- const [isMobile, setIsMobile] = React.useState<boolean | undefined>(undefined) + const [isMobile, setIsMobile] = React.useState<boolean | undefined>( + typeof window !== 'undefined' ? window.innerWidth < MOBILE_BREAKPOINT : undefined + )Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
frontend/app/content-library/page.tsx (2)
234-234: LGTM! Improved spacing and visual consistency.The padding changes from
pt-6topy-6provide better vertical balance, and the addition ofpy-6to the preview card maintains consistent spacing throughout the component.Also applies to: 259-259, 299-299
254-254: LGTM! More subtle selection indicator.Reducing the ring thickness from
ring-2toring-1creates a more subtle selection indicator that's less visually aggressive while still clearly indicating the selected state.frontend/package.json (1)
48-48: LGTM! Appropriate dependency updates.The addition of
@tabler/icons-reactand the patch update toclass-variance-authoritysupport the new UI components introduced in this PR. The reorganization ofcrypto-jsdoesn't affect functionality.Also applies to: 51-51, 54-54
frontend/middleware.ts (2)
61-63: LGTM: Redirect destination updated correctly.The redirect logic from setup page to content-library is properly implemented and aligns with the broader UI navigation restructuring.
81-81: LGTM: Matcher configuration updated appropriately.Adding "/content-library/:path*" to the matcher list is necessary to enable middleware interception for the new navigation structure.
frontend/app/prompts/page.tsx (3)
120-125: LGTM: SearchParams type updated for async handling.The type change from optional object to optional Promise is correct for Next.js App Router compatibility.
187-192: LGTM: Consistent type update in PromptsContent.The searchParams type is consistently updated to handle async resolution.
199-201: LGTM: Proper async searchParams handling.The implementation correctly awaits the searchParams Promise and provides a safe fallback to an empty object. This prevents potential issues with accessing unresolved Promises.
frontend/components/layout/MainLayout.tsx (3)
4-5: LGTM: Appropriate imports for new sidebar architecture.The imports correctly bring in the new AppSidebar component and sidebar provider components.
27-35: LGTM: Well-configured SidebarProvider with custom dimensions.The custom CSS variables provide sensible sidebar widths that are more compact than defaults. The inline styles approach is acceptable for component-specific customization.
36-70:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify that page title functionality is properly handled.
The layout restructure looks clean and follows React patterns well. However, I notice that the
pageTitleprop is no longer used in the header structure - it's only used for theisFullscreendetermination.Please verify that page titles are now handled by individual pages or the AppSidebar component, since they've been removed from the main layout header.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how page titles are handled in the new structure # Expected: Find page title usage in AppSidebar or individual pages echo "=== Searching for page title usage in AppSidebar ===" ast-grep --pattern 'pageTitle' echo "=== Searching for document.title or metadata usage ===" rg -A 3 "document\.title|metadata.*title" echo "=== Checking if pages set their own titles ===" rg -A 2 "title.*:" --type tsxLength of output: 66591
Ensure Page Title Display Is Handled Elsewhere
Our verification didn’t find any rendering of
pageTitlebeyond theisFullscreencheck in MainLayout:
- No references to
pageTitlein AppSidebar or page‐level components- No
document.titleassignments, React Helmet usage, or similar hooks- Tests still expect a
data-page-titleattribute on MainLayoutPlease confirm that:
- Individual pages set their own titles (e.g., via React Helmet or Next.js
metadata).- AppSidebar or another component is responsible for displaying the current title.
- The now-unused
pageTitleprop and any related test assertions are removed or updated.frontend/components/layout/TopNavigation.tsx (5)
3-3: LGTM: Cleaned up unused imports.Removing imports for the eliminated search and logo functionality keeps the code clean.
30-31: LGTM: Improved semantic structure.Using a semantic
headerelement instead of a genericdivis a good accessibility and HTML semantics improvement.
40-43: LGTM: Visual separators enhance UI hierarchy.The vertical separators between action buttons improve visual grouping and spacing.
Also applies to: 54-57
46-46: LGTM: Consistent button variant updates.Changing from "ghost" to "outline" variants provides better visual consistency and likely aligns with the updated design system.
Also applies to: 62-62
88-88: LGTM: Updated color classes for design consistency.The color changes from gray to neutral classes likely align with an updated design system or theme structure.
Also applies to: 106-106
frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx (1)
73-176: The component implementation looks good overall.The AppSidebar component is well-structured with proper use of React hooks, conditional rendering, and accessibility features. The collapsible functionality and user profile integration are implemented correctly.
frontend/components/ui/button.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Good styling refinements and code cleanup.The changes improve the button component with:
- Standardized import formatting
- Refined shadow and focus-visible styles for better visual consistency
- Added dark mode support for destructive variant
- Code style cleanup removing trailing punctuation
These are solid improvements that maintain backward compatibility while enhancing the visual design.
Also applies to: 5-5, 13-13, 15-15, 35-36, 46-47, 56-57, 59-59
frontend/__tests__/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx (1)
1-140: Overall test structure and coverage is excellent.The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the MainLayout component with proper mocking strategies and good scenario coverage including fullscreen mode, active navigation, and sidebar provider integration.
frontend/components/ui/input.tsx (1)
10-15: Good consolidation of input styling with accessibility support.The new implementation consolidates all styling into a single, comprehensive class string with proper focus-visible and aria-invalid support. The styling approach is more direct and includes good accessibility features.
frontend/__tests__/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx (6)
1-5: LGTM: Clean imports and proper testing setup.The imports are well-structured and include all necessary testing utilities and component dependencies.
21-25: LGTM: Appropriate logout action mocking.The logout action mock is simple and suitable for testing component behavior.
27-43: Well-designed helper function with good reusability.The
renderSidebarfunction follows good testing patterns by:
- Providing sensible defaults
- Returning both render result and mocks for verification
- Encapsulating the provider setup
46-49: LGTM: Basic rendering test covers core functionality.Simple and effective test to ensure the component renders successfully.
74-79: LGTM: Proper user information display testing.Good verification that user data from the auth mock is correctly displayed in the UI.
89-93: LGTM: Settings button test is appropriate.Simple and effective verification of the settings button presence.
| @layer base { | ||
| * { | ||
| @apply border-border outline-ring/50; | ||
| } | ||
| body { | ||
| @apply bg-background text-foreground; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consolidate duplicate @layer base declarations.
This creates a second @layer base block that duplicates and potentially conflicts with the existing one (lines 283-308). The body styles are already defined in the first @layer base block with @apply bg-background text-foreground font-sans antialiased.
Consider consolidating these styles into the existing @layer base block to avoid specificity conflicts and maintain a single source of truth.
-@layer base {
- * {
- @apply border-border outline-ring/50;
- }
- body {
- @apply bg-background text-foreground;
- }
-}Add the border-border outline-ring/50 styles to the existing * selector in the first @layer base block instead.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @layer base { | |
| * { | |
| @apply border-border outline-ring/50; | |
| } | |
| body { | |
| @apply bg-background text-foreground; | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/app/globals.css around lines 491 to 498, there is a duplicate @layer
base block that conflicts with the existing one at lines 283-308. To fix this,
remove the second @layer base block entirely and add the styles `border-border
outline-ring/50` to the existing `*` selector inside the first @layer base
block. This consolidates all base styles in one place and prevents specificity
conflicts.
| @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ | |||
| /* stylelint-disable at-rule-no-unknown */ | |||
| @import "tailwindcss"; | |||
|
|
|||
| @custom-variant dark (&:is(.dark *)); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate dark variant declaration.
The @custom-variant dark declaration duplicates the existing @variant dark declaration on line 7. This redundancy could cause confusion and maintenance issues.
-@custom-variant dark (&:is(.dark *));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @custom-variant dark (&:is(.dark *)); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/app/globals.css at line 4, remove the duplicate `@custom-variant
dark (&:is(.dark *));` declaration because it duplicates the existing `@variant
dark` declaration on line 7. Keeping only the `@variant dark` declaration will
avoid redundancy and improve maintainability.
| import { useAuth } from "@/lib/auth"; | ||
| import { logout } from "@/components/actions/logout-action"; | ||
|
|
||
| // 主要导航数据 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace Chinese comments with English for better internationalization.
The codebase contains Chinese comments which may not be accessible to all team members. Consider using English comments for better collaboration in international teams.
-// 主要导航数据
+// Main navigation data
- {/* 左侧：Logo和品牌名称 - 在折叠状态下隐藏 */}
+ {/* Left: Logo and brand name - hidden in collapsed state */}
- {/* 右侧：Sidebar Trigger - 在折叠状态下居中 */}
+ {/* Right: Sidebar Trigger - centered in collapsed state */}
- {/* 快速创建 - 采用参考示例样式 */}
+ {/* Quick create - using reference example styles */}
- {/* 主要导航 */}
+ {/* Main navigation */}
- {/* 次要导航 */}
+ {/* Secondary navigation */}Also applies to: 81-81, 86-86, 92-92, 111-111, 133-133
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx at lines 35, 81, 86, 92, 111, and
133, replace all Chinese comments with English comments to improve code
accessibility and collaboration for international team members. Translate the
existing Chinese comments accurately into clear English equivalents while
preserving their original meaning.
| navSecondary: [ | ||
| { | ||
| title: "Settings", | ||
| icon: Settings, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused navigation data or implement it in the UI.
The navSecondary data is defined but never used in the sidebar UI. Either remove it or implement the secondary navigation section.
If you want to implement the secondary navigation, update lines 134-138:
<SidebarGroup className="mt-auto !px-4">
<SidebarGroupContent>
-
+ <SidebarMenu>
+ {data.navSecondary.map((item) => (
+ <SidebarMenuItem key={item.title}>
+ <SidebarMenuButton onClick={onSettingsClick} tooltip={item.title}>
+ <item.icon />
+ <span>{item.title}</span>
+ </SidebarMenuButton>
+ </SidebarMenuItem>
+ ))}
+ </SidebarMenu>
</SidebarGroupContent>
</SidebarGroup>Or if not needed, remove the unused data:
- navSecondary: [
- {
- title: "Settings",
- icon: Settings,
- },
- ],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| navSecondary: [ | |
| { | |
| title: "Settings", | |
| icon: Settings, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }; | |
| <SidebarGroup className="mt-auto !px-4"> | |
| <SidebarGroupContent> | |
| <SidebarMenu> | |
| {data.navSecondary.map((item) => ( | |
| <SidebarMenuItem key={item.title}> | |
| <SidebarMenuButton onClick={onSettingsClick} tooltip={item.title}> | |
| <item.icon /> | |
| <span>{item.title}</span> | |
| </SidebarMenuButton> | |
| </SidebarMenuItem> | |
| ))} | |
| </SidebarMenu> | |
| </SidebarGroupContent> | |
| </SidebarGroup> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx around lines 60 to 66, the
navSecondary navigation data is defined but not used in the sidebar UI. To fix
this, either remove the entire navSecondary array if it is unnecessary, or
implement a secondary navigation section in the sidebar component by adding UI
code to render navSecondary items, similar to the primary navigation rendering
around lines 134 to 138.
| (usePathname as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue("/dashboard"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("应该正确渲染MainLayout和所有子组件", () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using English for test descriptions to improve international collaboration.
The test descriptions are written in Chinese, which may not be accessible to all team members. Consider using English for better collaboration in international teams.
- it("应该正确渲染MainLayout和所有子组件", () => {
+ it("should correctly render MainLayout and all child components", () => {
- it("应该在fullscreen模式下正确渲染", () => {
+ it("should correctly render in fullscreen mode", () => {
- it("应该正确显示当前激活的导航项", () => {
+ it("should correctly highlight the current active navigation item", () => {
- it("应该包含SidebarProvider并正确管理sidebar状态", () => {
+ it("should include SidebarProvider and correctly manage sidebar state", () => {
- it("应该正确处理没有pageTitle的情况", () => {
+ it("should correctly handle cases without pageTitle", () => {Also applies to: 70-70, 87-87, 111-111, 127-127
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/__tests__/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx at lines 48, 70, 87,
111, and 127, the test descriptions are currently written in Chinese. To improve
international collaboration and accessibility, rewrite these test descriptions
in English while preserving their original meaning.
| expect(screen.getByAltText("Nexus Logo")).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText("Nexus")).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText("Dashboard")).toBeInTheDocument(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Fix branding inconsistency between tests and component.
The tests reference "Nexus" branding, but the AppSidebar component uses "Telepace". This inconsistency suggests the tests may be outdated or testing the wrong component.
Run this script to verify the current branding used in the MainLayout and AppSidebar components:
Also applies to: 78-78
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check branding consistency between MainLayout, AppSidebar and tests
echo "=== Checking for Nexus references ==="
rg -i "nexus" frontend/components/layout/
echo "=== Checking for Telepace references ==="
rg -i "telepace" frontend/components/layout/
echo "=== Checking test expectations ==="
rg "Nexus" frontend/__tests__/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsxLength of output: 706
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Inspect MainLayout for branding and alt text
echo "=== Searching for Telepace in MainLayout ==="
rg -n "Telepace" frontend/components/layout/MainLayout.tsx
echo "=== Searching for alt attributes in MainLayout ==="
rg -n "alt=" frontend/components/layout/MainLayout.tsx
echo "=== Inspecting AppSidebar img tags for logos ==="
rg -n "<img" frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsxLength of output: 487
Update MainLayout tests to reflect Telepace branding
The MainLayout tests still reference “Nexus” even though the AppSidebar and layout now use “Telepace.” Update the assertions in frontend/tests/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx to match the current branding.
• File: frontend/tests/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx
Replace all occurrences of “Nexus” with “Telepace” in the following assertions:
- expect(screen.getByAltText("Nexus Logo")).toBeInTheDocument();
- expect(screen.getByText("Nexus")).toBeInTheDocument();
- expect(screen.getByText("Nexus")).toBeInTheDocument();
+ expect(screen.getByAltText("Telepace Logo")).toBeInTheDocument();
+ expect(screen.getByText("Telepace")).toBeInTheDocument();
+ expect(screen.getByText("Telepace")).toBeInTheDocument();🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/__tests__/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx around lines 56 to
58 and line 78, update the test assertions to replace all occurrences of "Nexus"
with "Telepace" to match the current branding used in the MainLayout and
AppSidebar components. This includes changing the alt text and any text content
assertions referencing "Nexus" to "Telepace" to ensure the tests reflect the
actual UI branding.
| function Input({ className, type, ...props }: React.ComponentProps<"input">) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <input | ||
| type={type} | ||
| data-slot="input" | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| "file:text-foreground placeholder:text-muted-foreground selection:bg-primary selection:text-primary-foreground dark:bg-input/30 border-input flex h-9 w-full min-w-0 rounded-md border bg-transparent px-3 py-1 text-base shadow-xs transition-[color,box-shadow] outline-none file:inline-flex file:h-7 file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium disabled:pointer-events-none disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm", | ||
| "focus-visible:border-ring focus-visible:ring-ring/50 focus-visible:ring-[3px]", | ||
| "aria-invalid:ring-destructive/20 dark:aria-invalid:ring-destructive/40 aria-invalid:border-destructive", | ||
| className | ||
| )} | ||
| {...props} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify that the Input component simplification doesn't break existing usage.
The component has been significantly simplified by removing:
forwardReffunctionality- Variant-based styling with
stateprop - Custom interface extending
VariantProps
This is a breaking change that may affect existing usage throughout the codebase.
Run this script to verify existing Input component usage:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Input component usage that might be affected by the simplification
echo "=== Checking for Input component imports and usage ==="
rg -A 3 -B 1 "import.*Input" frontend/
echo "=== Checking for state prop usage ==="
rg "state=" frontend/ --type tsx --type ts
echo "=== Checking for forwardRef usage with Input ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "ref.*Input|Input.*ref" frontend/
echo "=== Checking for Input with custom props ==="
ast-grep --pattern '<Input $$$state=$_ $$$>'Length of output: 65742
Let’s broaden the search to catch any JSX usage and imports of the Input component in TS/TSX files:
This will help confirm whether removing the variant API truly has no downstream impact.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JSX usage of <Input> in TSX files
echo "=== JSX usage of <Input> ==="
rg "<Input" frontend/ --type tsx -n
# Search for any import of Input in TS/TSX
echo -e "\n=== import statements for Input ==="
rg "import.*\bInput\b" frontend/ --type tsx --type ts -nLength of output: 306
Let’s re-run using file globs instead of --type:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
echo "=== JSX usage of <Input> in TSX files ==="
rg '<Input\b' -g '*.tsx' frontend/ -n
echo -e "\n=== import statements for Input ==="
rg 'import.*\bInput\b' -g '*.ts*' frontend/ -nLength of output: 5177
Action Required: Restore ref forwarding and review variant API removal in Input
The Input component is imported and used in dozens of places across the frontend (e.g. SettingsPanel.tsx, PromptForm.tsx, TagForm.tsx, login/page.tsx, etc.). By stripping out forwardRef, any refs passed via form libraries like React Hook Form (e.g. {...field}) or direct ref props will no longer attach to the underlying <input>, breaking focus, validation, and uncontrolled use-cases.
Additionally, although no direct state prop usage was found, removing the variant-based styling API may impact error/invalid state styling for components that previously relied on state="error" or similar.
Please update the Input implementation to:
- Wrap in
forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, React.ComponentProps<'input'>> - Attach
refto the actual<input> - (Optional) Reintroduce or adapt the variant/state prop if error-state styling is needed
Suggested diff:
-import function Input({ className, type, ...props }: React.ComponentProps<"input">) {
- return <input type={type} className={cn(/*…*/)} {...props} />
-}
+import { forwardRef } from "react"
+
+export const Input = forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, React.ComponentProps<"input">>(
+ ({ className, type, ...props }, ref) => (
+ <input
+ ref={ref}
+ type={type}
+ data-slot="input"
+ className={cn(/* existing class list */, className)}
+ {...props}
+ />
+ )
+)
+
+Input.displayName = "Input"– After restoring forwardRef, verify all form integrations and error-state styles continue to work.
– If you intend to permanently drop the variant/state API, ensure no components depend on it or update them to use the new styling approach.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/components/ui/input.tsx around lines 5 to 19, the Input component
was simplified by removing forwardRef and the variant/state prop, which breaks
ref forwarding and potentially error-state styling. To fix this, wrap the Input
function with React.forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, React.ComponentProps<'input'>>,
pass the ref to the underlying <input> element, and optionally reintroduce or
adapt the variant/state prop if error-state styling is needed. After these
changes, verify that all form integrations and error-state styles continue to
work correctly.
| it("renders upload content section", () => { | ||
| renderSidebar(); | ||
|
|
||
| // 测试Upload Content按钮存在 | ||
| const uploadContentButtons = screen.getAllByText("Upload Content"); | ||
| expect(uploadContentButtons.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address language consistency and improve test specificity.
Two issues to address:
- Chinese comment in English codebase
- Vague assertion using
length > 0
it("renders upload content section", () => {
renderSidebar();
- // 测试Upload Content按钮存在
- const uploadContentButtons = screen.getAllByText("Upload Content");
- expect(uploadContentButtons.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+ // Test Upload Content button exists
+ expect(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Upload Content" })).toBeInTheDocument();
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it("renders upload content section", () => { | |
| renderSidebar(); | |
| // 测试Upload Content按钮存在 | |
| const uploadContentButtons = screen.getAllByText("Upload Content"); | |
| expect(uploadContentButtons.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); | |
| }); | |
| it("renders upload content section", () => { | |
| renderSidebar(); | |
| // Test Upload Content button exists | |
| expect(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Upload Content" })).toBeInTheDocument(); | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/__tests__/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx around lines 81 to
87, replace the Chinese comment with an English one for language consistency and
improve the test assertion by checking for a more specific condition, such as
verifying that exactly one "Upload Content" button is rendered or that the
button is visible, instead of just asserting the length is greater than zero.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx (3)
34-34: Replace Chinese comments with English for better internationalization.This is the same issue flagged in previous reviews. Chinese comments should be replaced with English for better team collaboration.
59-65: Remove unused navigation data or implement it in the UI.The
navSecondarydata is still defined but unused in the sidebar UI, as flagged in previous reviews. This creates dead code.
81-81: Replace Chinese comments with English for better internationalization.Multiple Chinese comments throughout the component need to be translated to English, as flagged in previous reviews.
Also applies to: 86-86, 92-92, 111-111, 133-133
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx (2)
6-10: Consider consolidating icon libraries for consistency.The component imports icons from both
lucide-reactand@tabler/icons-react. Using a single icon library would improve consistency and reduce bundle size.Consider standardizing on one icon library. If you prefer Tabler icons, you could replace the Lucide icons:
import { - Settings, ChevronUp, } from "lucide-react"; -import { IconCirclePlusFilled,IconHome,IconDashboard,IconTags,IconMessageChatbot,IconInnerShadowTop,IconUser } from "@tabler/icons-react"; +import { + IconCirclePlusFilled, + IconHome, + IconDashboard, + IconTags, + IconMessageChatbot, + IconInnerShadowTop, + IconUser, + IconSettings, + IconChevronUp +} from "@tabler/icons-react";
147-151: Improve fallback values for user information display.The fallback values "User" and "[email protected]" could be more descriptive and less confusing for users.
Consider more appropriate fallback values:
<span className="truncate font-semibold"> - {user?.full_name || "User"} + {user?.full_name || "Guest User"} </span> <span className="truncate text-xs"> - {user?.email || "[email protected]"} + {user?.email || "Not signed in"} </span>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Makefile(1 hunks)frontend/app/content-library/page.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Makefile
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/app/content-library/page.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx (3)
frontend/components/ui/sidebar.tsx (11)
Sidebar(702-702)SidebarHeader(709-709)SidebarTrigger(724-724)SidebarContent(703-703)SidebarGroup(705-705)SidebarGroupContent(707-707)SidebarMenu(712-712)SidebarMenuItem(716-716)SidebarMenuButton(715-715)SidebarFooter(704-704)SidebarRail(722-722)frontend/jest.setup.ts (1)
usePathname(191-193)frontend/components/ui/dropdown-menu.tsx (4)
DropdownMenu(287-287)DropdownMenuTrigger(289-289)DropdownMenuContent(290-290)DropdownMenuItem(293-293)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (4, 4)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (3, 4)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (1, 4)
- GitHub Check: test-playwright (2, 4)
- GitHub Check: Complete CI/CD Pipeline
- GitHub Check: test-backend
- GitHub Check: test-docker-compose
| <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => logout()}> | ||
| <span>Sign out</span> | ||
| </DropdownMenuItem> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for logout action.
The logout function is called without error handling, which could lead to silent failures if the logout process encounters issues.
Add error handling for the logout action:
- <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => logout()}>
+ <DropdownMenuItem onClick={async () => {
+ try {
+ await logout();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Logout failed:', error);
+ // Optionally show user notification
+ }
+ }}>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => logout()}> | |
| <span>Sign out</span> | |
| </DropdownMenuItem> | |
| <DropdownMenuItem onClick={async () => { | |
| try { | |
| await logout(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Logout failed:', error); | |
| // Optionally show user notification | |
| } | |
| }}> | |
| <span>Sign out</span> | |
| </DropdownMenuItem> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx around lines 163 to 165, the logout
function is called without any error handling, which may cause silent failures.
Wrap the logout call in a try-catch block or use a promise catch to handle
potential errors. In the catch block, log the error or display a user-friendly
message to ensure any issues during logout are properly handled and visible.
| export function AppSidebar({ onAddContentClick, ...props }: AppSidebarProps) { | ||
| const pathname = usePathname(); | ||
| const { user } = useAuth(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for authentication context.
The component assumes useAuth() will always return a valid user object, but should handle cases where authentication might fail or user data is unavailable.
Consider adding error boundaries or fallback handling:
export function AppSidebar({ onAddContentClick, ...props }: AppSidebarProps) {
const pathname = usePathname();
- const { user } = useAuth();
+ const { user, isLoading, error } = useAuth();
+
+ if (error) {
+ console.error('Authentication error in sidebar:', error);
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx around lines 71 to 73, the code
assumes useAuth() always returns a valid user object, which may not be true if
authentication fails or user data is missing. Add error handling to check if the
user object exists before using it. Implement fallback UI or logic to handle
cases when user is undefined or null, ensuring the component does not break and
provides a graceful fallback or error message.
User description
🫰 Thanks for your Pull Request! Here are some helpful tips:
👀 Purpose and Importance of this PR:
🅰 Fixes for Issues:
Fixes #
📝 Notes for the Reviewer:
🎯 How to Verify this PR:
📑 Additional Documentation, e.g., KEPs (Telepace Enhancement Proposals), Usage Docs, etc.:
Description
AppSidebarcomponent to enhance navigation structure.MainLayoutto integrateAppSidebarand manage state withSidebarProvider.AppSidebarand updatedMainLayouttests.Changes walkthrough 📝
5 files
AppSidebar.tsx
New AppSidebar Component for Navigationfrontend/components/layout/AppSidebar.tsx
AppSidebarcomponent for improved navigation.MainLayout.tsx
Refactor MainLayout to Use AppSidebarfrontend/components/layout/MainLayout.tsx
SidebarwithAppSidebarfor better structure.SidebarProviderfor state management.button.tsx
Refactor Button Component Stylesfrontend/components/ui/button.tsx
sheet.tsx
Refactor Sheet Componentfrontend/components/ui/sheet.tsx
tooltip.tsx
Refactor Tooltip Componentfrontend/components/ui/tooltip.tsx
3 files
AppSidebar.test.tsx
Tests for AppSidebar Componentfrontend/tests/components/layout/AppSidebar.test.tsx
AppSidebarcomponent functionality.MainLayout.test.tsx
Update Tests for MainLayout with AppSidebarfrontend/tests/components/layout/MainLayout.test.tsx
MainLayout.AppSidebarand its functionality.TopNavigation.test.tsx
Update Tests for TopNavigationfrontend/tests/components/layout/TopNavigation.test.tsx
TopNavigationto reflect UI changes.1 files
package.json
Update Dependencies for Iconsfrontend/package.json
@tabler/icons-reactdependency for icon usage.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Bug Fixes
Chores
Tests
Style