feat: add math/base/special/asinhf

[nakul-krishnakumar]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: passed
• task: lint_repl_help status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: passed
• task: lint_c_examples status: passed
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves None.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Adds math/base/special/asinhf .

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• None.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

None.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/asinhf	$\color{green}245/245$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}19/19$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}245/245$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[anandkaranubc]

Thanks @nakul-krishnakumar for working on this! This PR should be ready to land. 🚀

I made a few corrections to the PR. Feel free to comment if you’d like clarification on why those changes were made.

As a side note, if possible, please use t.strictEqual( v, e, 'returns expected value' ); for test comparisons. It is not recommended to use ulp-difference in cases where strict equality already holds true.