Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 28, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@erizocosmico
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #575

@erizocosmico erizocosmico requested a review from a team December 21, 2018 10:06
{validateSchemaSourceRule, validateSchemaSource},
{validateProjectTuplesRule, validateProjectTuples},
{validateIndexCreationRule, validateIndexCreation},
{validateCaseResultTypesRule, validateCaseResultTypes},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just open question - doesn't make sense as a optimization to squash some rules?
For instance instead of 3 times looping, we may have one loop with some cases - loud thinking.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this query phase is really fast compared with the rest. The idea of having separated rules is the synergy that we can obtain executing them again and again, interacting with other rules.

@ajnavarro
Copy link
Contributor

@erizocosmico could you rebase please?

@erizocosmico
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

@ajnavarro ajnavarro merged commit 7afa882 into src-d:master Jan 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants