Skip to content

Provide support for deprecated auto-configuration classes #14860

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
philwebb opened this issue Oct 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Provide support for deprecated auto-configuration classes #14860

philwebb opened this issue Oct 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
@philwebb
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone
3.4.0-M3

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

#14412 shows that we need a way to offer deprecated auto-configuration classes. Such classes would not need to actually contain configuration, but would still be valid when used as an exclude or and @AutoConfigureBefore/@AutoConfigureAfter value.
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 2.x milestone Oct 17, 2018
@philwebb philwebb added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Oct 17, 2018
@mbhave mbhave mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2018
Closed
@philwebb
Copy link
Member Author

Prototype work https://github.com/philwebb/spring-boot/tree/gh-14860

@mbhave
Copy link
Contributor

mbhave commented Oct 30, 2018

This one looks similar: #6684

@snicoll snicoll mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2018
Closed
@mbhave mbhave mentioned this issue Jan 16, 2019
Closed
@philwebb philwebb mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2021
Closed
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

We have no need for this at this time. Closing for now.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona removed this from the 2.x milestone Apr 27, 2022
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added the status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply label Apr 27, 2022
@mhalbritter mhalbritter reopened this Jul 26, 2023
@mhalbritter mhalbritter removed the status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply label Jul 26, 2023
@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

mhalbritter commented Jul 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

We talked about that today and decided to resurrect that issue. We have a need for it due to #36544 where we want to rename OpenTelemetryAutoConfiguration to OpenTelemetryTracingAutoConfiguration without breaking users.

@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.2.x milestone Jul 26, 2023
@mhalbritter mhalbritter mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2023
Closed
@philwebb philwebb modified the milestones: 3.2.x, 3.x Sep 11, 2023
@philwebb philwebb mentioned this issue Aug 22, 2024
Closed
@philwebb philwebb self-assigned this Sep 6, 2024
@philwebb philwebb modified the milestones: 3.x, 3.4.0-M3 Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@philwebb philwebb

Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.4.0-M3
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@philwebb @wilkinsona @mbhave @mhalbritter