Skip to content

Conversation

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Jul 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded instructions for scaffolding Snakemake plugins to include prerequisites and step-by-step usage of pixi and Snakedeploy.
  • Style
    • Improved command-line interface help messages and descriptions for greater clarity and consistency across subcommands.
  • Chores
    • Updated release workflow with a split job structure, enhanced environment setup, and conditional publishing based on release creation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the release workflow by splitting it into two jobs with improved conditional logic, updated actions, and environment setup. Documentation for scaffolding Snakemake plugins now includes pixi installation and detailed stepwise instructions. The Snakedeploy CLI parser was enhanced with explicit help messages for subcommands, improving usability without changing logic or API signatures.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/release-please.yml Workflow split into release-please and publish jobs; updated release action, outputs, environment setup, and job-level conditionals.
docs/snakemake_developers/scaffold_snakemake_plugins.rst Expanded documentation to require pixi, detail project initialization, and clarify stepwise scaffolding instructions.
snakedeploy/client.py Added explicit help messages to CLI subcommands and updated main parser description; no logic or API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a3665d and f26fb7a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakedeploy/client.py (6 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
snakedeploy/client.py (1)

1-327: CI is red – run ruff format.

The pipeline fails with a Ruff formatting error.
Run ruff format --write (or the project’s formatter target) before merging.

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
snakedeploy/client.py (3)

64-66: Redundant description & help strings – keep one.

argparse already shows the command description as part of --help; specifying the identical text again via help= duplicates output.
Prefer to leave description= only (or shorten one of them) to avoid verbose, repetitive help screens.

-deploy_workflow_parser = subparsers.add_parser(
-    "deploy-workflow", description="Deploy a workflow from a git repository.", help="Deploy a workflow from a git repository."
+deploy_workflow_parser = subparsers.add_parser(
+    "deploy-workflow",
+    description="Deploy a workflow from a git repository.",
 )

122-124: Spelling: “envrionments” → “environments”.

Minor typo in the help text.

-    help="Pin/lock given conda envrionments to compatible package URLs at the time of invocation.",
+    help="Pin/lock given conda environments to compatible package URLs at the time of invocation.",

218-220: Duplicated wording in help/description.

Same issue as above – remove the duplicate to keep help concise.

-update_snakemake_wrappers = subparsers.add_parser(
-    "update-snakemake-wrappers",
-    help="Update all snakemake wrappers in given Snakefiles.",
-    description="Update all snakemake wrappers in given Snakefiles.",
+update_snakemake_wrappers = subparsers.add_parser(
+    "update-snakemake-wrappers",
+    description="Update all snakemake wrappers in given Snakefiles.",
 )
.github/workflows/release-please.yml (1)

38-38: Add trailing newline to satisfy YAML-lint.

Static analysis flags the missing newline at EOF.

-          password: ${{ secrets.PYPI_TOKEN }}
+          password: ${{ secrets.PYPI_TOKEN }}
+
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5bddbe5 and 2a3665d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pyproject.toml is excluded by !pyproject.toml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/release-please.yml (1 hunks)
  • docs/snakemake_developers/scaffold_snakemake_plugins.rst (1 hunks)
  • snakedeploy/client.py (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.

Files:

  • snakedeploy/client.py
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/release-please.yml

[error] 38-38: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
snakedeploy/client.py

[error] 1-1: Ruff formatting check failed. File would be reformatted. Run 'ruff format --write' to fix code style issues.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/snakemake_developers/scaffold_snakemake_plugins.rst (1)

8-18: Great clarification of pixi prerequisite.

The extra context on pixi setup will prevent user confusion. Nice!

@johanneskoester johanneskoester merged commit 80f9837 into main Jul 25, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@johanneskoester johanneskoester deleted the fixes branch July 25, 2025 15:28
johanneskoester pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.12.1](v0.12.0...v0.12.1)
(2025-07-25)


### Documentation

* improved help and docs
([#91](#91))
([80f9837](80f9837))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants