Add ExclusifyUnion type
#1278
Merged
Add ExclusifyUnion type
#1278
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
som-sm
force-pushed
the
feat/add-exclusify-union-type
branch
from
91929af to
6b32cef
Compare
som-sm
commented
Oct 18, 2025
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
ycmjason
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2025
|
I've written a little article to introduce this type (currently a draft, but accessible via the following link): Would be nice to hear some feedback and I think it would be a nice introduction to this type. I will publish this article once this is merged! |
Owner
|
Looks good |
som-sm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2025
jodikalin67-png
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1275