Skip to content

upgrade go-github to v72 #4220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2025
Merged

upgrade go-github to v72 #4220

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2025

Conversation

cpanato
Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato commented Jun 4, 2025

Summary

  • upgrade go-github to v72

Signed-off-by: Carlos Panato <[email protected]>
@cpanato cpanato requested review from a team as code owners June 4, 2025 08:35
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 34.41%. Comparing base (2ef6022) to head (30a9e94).
Report is 395 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   40.10%   34.41%   -5.70%     
==========================================
  Files         155      210      +55     
  Lines       10044    13746    +3702     
==========================================
+ Hits         4028     4730     +702     
- Misses       5530     8429    +2899     
- Partials      486      587     +101     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@cpanato cpanato merged commit fce8b6d into sigstore:main Jun 4, 2025
29 checks passed
@cpanato cpanato deleted the update-go-github branch June 4, 2025 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants