Skip to content

Another motivation for CFG: return-oriented programming #75753

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 22, 2020
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,8 +19,9 @@ CFG functionality is completely implemented in the LLVM backend and is supported

## When to use Control Flow Guard

The primary motivation for enabling CFG in Rust is to enhance security when linking against non-Rust code, especially C/C++ code. To achieve full CFG protection, all indirect calls (including any from Rust code) must have the appropriate CFG checks, as added by this flag. CFG can also improve security for Rust code that uses the `unsafe` keyword
The primary motivation for enabling CFG in Rust is to enhance security when linking against non-Rust code, especially C/C++ code. To achieve full CFG protection, all indirect calls (including any from Rust code) must have the appropriate CFG checks, as added by this flag. CFG can also improve security for Rust code that uses the `unsafe` keyword.

Another motivation behind CFG is to harden programs against [return-oriented programming (ROP)](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return-oriented_programming) attacks. CFG disallows an attacker from taking advantage of the programs own instructions while redirecting control flow in unexpected ways.

## Overhead of Control Flow Guard

Expand Down