Skip to content

Conversation

@AleksandrParamonoff
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Optimized Docker build pipeline with multistage compilation for improved efficiency and build caching
    • Updated release tooling to separate Docker image building into dedicated automated workflow
  • Tests

    • Added test coverage for tool compatibility features and array schema validation

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Walkthrough

Removes Docker image definitions from .goreleaser.yaml, converts release.dockerfile to a multistage Go builder + distroless runtime, and adds string-item schema support plus a unit test for test_items_ids in ReportPortal tooling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Goreleaser configuration
\.goreleaser.yaml
Removes dockers and docker_manifests sections; comment added that Docker images are built separately via Docker Buildx workflow.
Release Dockerfile
release.dockerfile
Replaces single-stage image with a multistage build: golang:1.24.4 AS builder compiles the binary, final image uses gcr.io/distroless/base-debian12 and COPY --from=builder to include the binary.
ReportPortal schema & tests
internal/reportportal/items.go, internal/reportportal/items_test.go
Adds mcp.WithStringItems() to the test_items_ids array option and introduces TestUpdateDefectTypeForTestItemsTool to assert test_items_ids is an array with items of type string; imports updated for testing utilities.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Verify builder stage successfully produces /build/reportportal-mcp-server and the COPY --from=builder path matches.
  • Confirm runtime image contains required libraries for the binary (distroless expectations).
  • Validate that mcp.WithStringItems() is the correct schema helper and that the new test asserts the exact nested structure intended.
  • Check for any CI/workflow changes that must accompany removal from .goreleaser.yaml (Docker Buildx workflow existence).

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • avarabyeu
  • AmsterGet

Poem

🐳 Builder compiles, distroless takes the stage,
Schemas tightened, tests turn the page.
Docker moved out to Buildx's light,
Strings in arrays now validated right.
Small changes, cleaner pipeline—cheers tonight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 66.67% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to evaluate whether documentation exists for the changeset. Add a description explaining the rationale for moving Docker builds to GitHub Actions, impact on the build process, and any relevant testing performed.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: moving Docker image build configuration from goreleaser.yaml to the release GitHub action workflow, which aligns with all modified files.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-release-build-process

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cb1bba4 and 762b628.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .goreleaser.yaml (1 hunks)
  • internal/reportportal/items.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/reportportal/items_test.go (2 hunks)
  • release.dockerfile (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.go

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (README.md)

**/*.go: Build and compile the ReportPortal MCP Server Go application using go build -o reportportal-mcp-server ./cmd/reportportal-mcp-server
Set environment variables RP_HOST, RP_PROJECT, and RP_API_TOKEN for stdio mode operation, or set MCP_MODE=http with MCP_SERVER_PORT and MCP_SERVER_HOST for HTTP mode
Require Go 1.24.1 or later for building the ReportPortal MCP Server
Add new tools by creating methods in resource files and registering them in the NewServer function using s.AddTool()
Ensure all MCP requests follow JSON-RPC 2.0 specification with required fields: jsonrpc, method, id, and params
Use /mcp or /api/mcp endpoints for POST requests (MCP protocol); use /, /health, /info, /api/status, or /metrics for GET requests only

Files:

  • internal/reportportal/items.go
  • internal/reportportal/items_test.go

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Focus on Go best practices, error handling, concurrency safety, performance, and security. Check for proper resource cleanup and context handling.

Files:

  • internal/reportportal/items.go
  • internal/reportportal/items_test.go
internal/reportportal/**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Pay special attention to API integration patterns, error handling, data validation, and MCP protocol compliance.

Files:

  • internal/reportportal/items.go
  • internal/reportportal/items_test.go
**/*_test.go

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Ensure comprehensive test coverage, proper test isolation, meaningful assertions, and good test naming conventions.

Files:

  • internal/reportportal/items_test.go
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: reportportal/reportportal-mcp-server PR: 0
File: README.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.go : Build and compile the ReportPortal MCP Server Go application using `go build -o reportportal-mcp-server ./cmd/reportportal-mcp-server`

Applied to files:

  • release.dockerfile
📚 Learning: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: reportportal/reportportal-mcp-server PR: 0
File: README.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.go : Require Go 1.24.1 or later for building the ReportPortal MCP Server

Applied to files:

  • release.dockerfile
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
internal/reportportal/items_test.go (1)
internal/reportportal/items.go (1)
  • NewTestItemResources (26-39)
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
release.dockerfile

[low] 20-20: Ensure the base image uses a non latest version tag

(CKV_DOCKER_7)


[low] 1-28: Ensure that HEALTHCHECK instructions have been added to container images

(CKV_DOCKER_2)


[low] 1-28: Ensure that a user for the container has been created

(CKV_DOCKER_3)

🪛 Hadolint (2.14.0)
release.dockerfile

[warning] 20-20: Always tag the version of an image explicitly

(DL3006)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Agent
  • GitHub Check: Call feature Docker build / Build and export to AWS ECR
🔇 Additional comments (3)
internal/reportportal/items.go (1)

708-712: LGTM! Schema enhancement improves tooling compatibility.

Adding mcp.WithStringItems() explicitly declares that the array contains string items, which improves VS Code and GitHub Copilot integration by providing clear type information in the MCP tool schema.

.goreleaser.yaml (1)

29-30: LGTM! Clear documentation of build process change.

The comment effectively explains why Docker builds were moved to a separate Docker Buildx workflow, noting the benefit of clean multi-arch images without intermediate tags.

release.dockerfile (1)

1-18: Excellent multistage build implementation!

The builder stage properly separates build-time dependencies from runtime, with good layer caching strategy (copying go.mod/go.sum first). The CGO_ENABLED=0 flag and build command align with project requirements, and the version injection via build args enables proper versioning.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR moves Docker image building from GoReleaser to a dedicated GitHub Actions workflow step, addressing ticket EPMRPP-110531. The change creates a cleaner multi-arch Docker image build process and includes a bug fix for VS Code/GitHub Copilot compatibility with MCP array parameters.

  • Refactored Dockerfile to use multi-stage builds with Go compilation in the builder stage
  • Removed Docker configuration from GoReleaser and added explicit Docker buildx step in GitHub Actions workflow
  • Fixed MCP array schema to include items property for VS Code/GitHub Copilot compatibility (issue #66)

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
release.dockerfile Converted from single-stage to multi-stage build with Go builder stage and distroless runtime
.goreleaser.yaml Removed Docker and Docker manifest configurations, delegating to GitHub Actions
.github/workflows/release.yml Added Docker buildx step to build and push multi-arch images with proper labels and tags
internal/reportportal/items.go Added mcp.WithStringItems() to array parameter for VS Code compatibility
internal/reportportal/items_test.go Added test to verify array items property exists in tool schema

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 762b628 and 2fb7f9a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .goreleaser.yaml (1 hunks)
  • release.dockerfile (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: reportportal/reportportal-mcp-server PR: 0
File: README.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.go : Build and compile the ReportPortal MCP Server Go application using `go build -o reportportal-mcp-server ./cmd/reportportal-mcp-server`

Applied to files:

  • release.dockerfile
📚 Learning: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: reportportal/reportportal-mcp-server PR: 0
File: README.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.go : Require Go 1.24.1 or later for building the ReportPortal MCP Server

Applied to files:

  • release.dockerfile
📚 Learning: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: reportportal/reportportal-mcp-server PR: 0
File: README.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-01T14:55:41.065Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.go : Set environment variables RP_HOST, RP_PROJECT, and RP_API_TOKEN for stdio mode operation, or set MCP_MODE=http with MCP_SERVER_PORT and MCP_SERVER_HOST for HTTP mode

Applied to files:

  • release.dockerfile
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
release.dockerfile

[low] 22-22: Ensure the base image uses a non latest version tag

(CKV_DOCKER_7)


[low] 1-30: Ensure that HEALTHCHECK instructions have been added to container images

(CKV_DOCKER_2)


[low] 1-30: Ensure that a user for the container has been created

(CKV_DOCKER_3)

🪛 Hadolint (2.14.0)
release.dockerfile

[warning] 22-22: Always tag the version of an image explicitly

(DL3006)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Call feature Docker build / Build and export to AWS ECR
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.goreleaser.yaml (1)

29-30: Clean removal aligns with workflow shift. The comment clearly communicates that Docker image building is now handled by Docker Buildx in the GitHub workflow, which is the intended architecture change for this PR. The goreleaser configuration remains intact for building the binaries themselves.

release.dockerfile (1)

1-19: Multistage build is solid and well-organized. The build stage properly caches dependencies (go.mod download before source copy), pins Go version to 1.24.4, and includes all ldflags from the goreleaser configuration (version, commit, build date). The release workflow correctly passes build arguments to the docker build command:

VERSION=${{ github.event.inputs.version }}
COMMIT=${{ github.sha }}
BUILD_DATE=${{ steps.build_date.outputs.timestamp }}

This maintains feature parity with the previous build process while enabling better Docker layer caching. The distroless base image is a good security choice, and the container defaults to a non-root user.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@AleksandrParamonoff AleksandrParamonoff merged commit 0033076 into develop Dec 4, 2025
10 checks passed
@AleksandrParamonoff AleksandrParamonoff deleted the fix-release-build-process branch December 4, 2025 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant