-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Proper support for remove_depends=False #490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gsakkis
wants to merge
9
commits into
reagento:develop
Choose a base branch
from
gsakkis:fix_remove_depends
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e4f8550
Run mypy on integrations.base and fix typing issues
gsakkis e30aaab
DRYfy the _get_auto_injected_* functions
gsakkis f504589
Allow passing explicitly the dependencies when remove_depends=False
gsakkis 76317d4
Unignore COM812
gsakkis 8ea2d9c
Optimize the remove_depends=True path
gsakkis 6327e8c
Remove asyncio.gather()
gsakkis cd21328
More optimization and refactoring: replace _iter_dependencies_to_inje…
gsakkis c161f7b
More remove_depends=True path optimization: just an extra isinstance(…
gsakkis 1a1eea0
Replace list comprehensions with normal loops
gsakkis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's have 2 spearate function arguments. One is used to bind, another - to iterate over deps. So we can simplify check with
if binder is not NoneThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, you mean replace the
dependencies: dict[str, DependencyKey] | ParameterDependencyResolverwith two parametersdependencies: dict[str, DependencyKey]andresolver: ParameterDependencyResolverin all_get_auto_injected_*functions, and then use only one of the two?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I mean this. It might be not clear in terms of encapsulation but easier to check and rewrite with code generation