Skip to content

[PATCH] Implemented validation logic for #196 #227

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Collaborator

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Nov 28, 2024

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:

  • implemented check for validating YAML_ARGS
    Logs

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:

  • implemented check for validating YAML_ARGS
    Logs

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and validation for YAML and Markdown linting processes.
    • Enhanced clarity of error reporting during installation checks.
  • New Features

    • Conditional execution for linting steps based on previous success.
    • Enhanced validation for YAML_ARGS to ensure only valid characters are used.
    • Introduced support for npm package ecosystem in Dependabot configuration.
    • Added markdown linting tools as CI dependencies.
    • New scripts for linting Markdown files added to package.json.
    • Removed outdated Markdown linting configuration file, streamlining the linting process.

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - implemented check for validating YAML_ARGS

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - implemented check for validating YAML_ARGS
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the GitHub workflows for linting Makefiles and Markdown files. Key changes include the addition of a print_error function for improved error message formatting and validation of the YAML_ARGS variable. The linting process for both Makefiles and Markdown files is enhanced with checks for valid arguments and the existence of necessary scripts. Additionally, configurations for the npm package ecosystem and new development dependencies are added, improving the robustness of the linting processes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml Added print_error function, enhanced error handling for installation failures, and validated YAML_ARGS.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml Introduced conditional execution for linting steps, improved error handling for installations, and updated YAML_ARGS validation.
.github/dependabot.yml Added configuration for npm package ecosystem, including update settings and labels for PRs.
package.json Introduced new development dependencies: markdownlint and markdownlint-cli. Added scripts for linting Markdown files.
.markdownlint.json Removed configuration file for Markdown linting rules, affecting linting checks across the project.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

  • Replace stickler #159: The changes in .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml, which include the introduction of the print_error function for error handling during the linting process, are directly related to the enhancements made in the same file in PR Replace stickler #159, where similar error handling improvements were implemented.

Suggested labels

Documentation

Poem

🐇 In the garden where workflows grow,
Linting scripts now put on a show.
With checks for YAML, oh what a sight,
Errors caught, everything feels right!
So hop along, let’s make it clear,
A robust process, we hold dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Testing Something can be verified CI Continuous Integration Tooling GitHub Anything Meta labels Nov 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.306%. Comparing base (e81581f) to head (15e16e7).
Report is 49 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #227   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   99.306%   99.306%           
=========================================
  Files            7         7           
  Lines          432       432           
  Branches        31        31           
=========================================
  Hits           429       429           
  Misses           2         2           
  Partials         1         1           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 99.306% <ø> (ø)
3.11 99.306% <ø> (ø)
3.12 99.306% <ø> (ø)
3.13 99.306% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest 99.306% <ø> (ø)
multicast 99.306% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest 99.306% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest 88.889% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e81581f...15e16e7. Read the comment docs.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall marked this pull request as ready for review November 29, 2024 09:08
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall linked an issue Nov 29, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - Use POSIX-compliant validation
 - Provide more detailed error messages
 - Add debug logging (safely)

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - fixed incorect file path
 - Use POSIX-compliant validation
 - Provide more detailed error messages
 - Add debug logging (safely)
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as off-topic.

…- WIP #227 -)

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - fixed regression by correctly setting `YAML_ARGS="${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}"` as inconsistant use of `"${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}"` and `${YAML_ARGS}` caused the regression.

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - fixed regression by correctly setting `YAML_ARGS="${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}"` as inconsistant use of `"${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}"` and `${YAML_ARGS}` caused the regression.
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

 -).

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - implemented `print_error` bash function
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Additions with file package.json:
 - new file to track all NPM dependencies in CI.

Changes in file .github/dependabot.yml:
 - updated to auto-update NPM stuff.

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - test npm via packages.json setup.
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - Possible fix for missing markdownlint with local install.

Changes in file package.json:
 - added script config
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@reactive-firewall

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - applied changes as discussed in review of PR #227
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - fixed regex
 - fixed error message
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f905026 and 89c0835.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers scripts to include explicit data processing steps that produce the expected output, ensuring accurate and useful results.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:50.461Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to specify the full raw URL when fetching files from gists to ensure correct retrieval of content, particularly when the file is in markdown format.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T04:45:25.464Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, avoiding raw source code dumps, and focusing on clear explanations and real-world examples.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: LICENSE.md:36-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T07:03:35.207Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that I verify URLs before suggesting changes, and avoid raising hypothetical issues without verification.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T08:20:59.928Z
Learning: When implementing package.json, reactive-firewall prefers to maintain flexibility in npm installation methods, supporting both global (-g) installations and local project-specific installations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T01:10:18.136Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, following the project's style and conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/check_pip:259-265
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:32:16.878Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that code changes adhere to SOLID design principles, specifically avoiding unnecessary complexity (AHA principle), maintaining the Single Responsibility Principle, and ensuring complex work is done on separate development branches (Open/Closed Principle).
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

35-35: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2182:error:8:12: This printf format string has no variables. Other arguments are ignored

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (2)

52-60: LGTM! Well-implemented error handling.

The error handling for npm installation is well-implemented with:

  • Proper error message capture using command substitution
  • Clear error reporting with specific locations
  • Good variable naming following project conventions

70-70: LGTM! Clean implementation of markdown linting.

The command properly uses npm scripts and handles file paths with spaces correctly.

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - fixed line numbers and stuff
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1)

71-71: Remove unnecessary trailing semicolon.

The trailing semicolon after the npm command is not needed.

-          xargs -0 -I{} npm run lint:md -- "{}";
+          xargs -0 -I{} npm run lint:md -- "{}"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89c0835 and 4d6c140.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers scripts to include explicit data processing steps that produce the expected output, ensuring accurate and useful results.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:50.461Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to specify the full raw URL when fetching files from gists to ensure correct retrieval of content, particularly when the file is in markdown format.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T04:45:25.464Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, avoiding raw source code dumps, and focusing on clear explanations and real-world examples.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: LICENSE.md:36-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T07:03:35.207Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that I verify URLs before suggesting changes, and avoid raising hypothetical issues without verification.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T08:20:59.928Z
Learning: When implementing package.json, reactive-firewall prefers to maintain flexibility in npm installation methods, supporting both global (-g) installations and local project-specific installations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T01:10:18.136Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, following the project's style and conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/check_pip:259-265
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:32:16.878Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that code changes adhere to SOLID design principles, specifically avoiding unnecessary complexity (AHA principle), maintaining the Single Responsibility Principle, and ensuring complex work is done on separate development branches (Open/Closed Principle).
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-12-03T03:18:50.682Z
Learning: In `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, reactive-firewall intentionally uses the regex pattern `if [[ "${YAML_ARGS}" =~ ^*[!a-zA-Z0-9\ \-\.]*$ ]]; then` for validation and prefers to keep it as is.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
🪛 GitHub Check: markdown-lint
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

[notice] 36-47: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)

34-34: LGTM! Good addition of conditional execution.

Adding the success condition ensures the step only runs when previous steps have completed successfully, which is a good practice for workflow reliability.


36-48: Well-implemented YAML arguments validation and handling!

The implementation includes:

  1. Secure validation of YAML_ARGS
  2. Clear error messaging with proper GitHub Actions annotations
  3. Safe argument splitting using read -ra
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: markdown-lint

[notice] 36-47: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings


52-61: Excellent error handling implementation for npm install!

The error handling:

  1. Captures npm's actual error output
  2. Reports errors with proper context and location
  3. Maintains clean error message formatting

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - improve YAML_ARGS validation logic

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - improve error message construction
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d6c140 and 01e224d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
📓 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers scripts to include explicit data processing steps that produce the expected output, ensuring accurate and useful results.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:50.461Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to specify the full raw URL when fetching files from gists to ensure correct retrieval of content, particularly when the file is in markdown format.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T04:45:25.464Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, avoiding raw source code dumps, and focusing on clear explanations and real-world examples.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: LICENSE.md:36-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T07:03:35.207Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that I verify URLs before suggesting changes, and avoid raising hypothetical issues without verification.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T08:20:59.928Z
Learning: When implementing package.json, reactive-firewall prefers to maintain flexibility in npm installation methods, supporting both global (-g) installations and local project-specific installations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T01:10:18.136Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, following the project's style and conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/check_pip:259-265
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:32:16.878Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that code changes adhere to SOLID design principles, specifically avoiding unnecessary complexity (AHA principle), maintaining the Single Responsibility Principle, and ensuring complex work is done on separate development branches (Open/Closed Principle).
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:34-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T09:46:47.010Z
Learning: For future scripts in workflow files (e.g., `.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml`), reactive-firewall prefers concise code and avoids unnecessary variable assignments when possible, such as using `${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}` directly without assigning it to another variable.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-12-03T03:18:50.682Z
Learning: In `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, reactive-firewall intentionally uses the regex pattern `if [[ "${YAML_ARGS}" =~ ^*[!a-zA-Z0-9\ \-\.]*$ ]]; then` for validation and prefers to keep it as is.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

70-70: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2034:warning:2:10: ARGS appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally)

(shellcheck)

🪛 GitHub Check: markdown-lint
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

[notice] 42-43: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings

🪛 GitHub Check: makefile-lint
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

[notice] 36-47: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings

🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)

26-37: LGTM! Well-structured error handling implementation.

The print_error function provides consistent error reporting and the installation checks are properly validated.


40-54: LGTM! Secure YAML_ARGS validation.

The implementation correctly:

  1. Validates input using the intended regex pattern
  2. Safely splits arguments using read -ra
  3. Uses array expansion for secure argument passing
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: markdown-lint

[notice] 42-43: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings


58-67: LGTM! Robust NPM installation error handling.

The implementation:

  1. Captures npm's error output
  2. Reports errors with proper context
  3. Maintains clean error reporting structure
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3)

2-16: LGTM! Well-documented function.

The documentation for print_error follows CEP-7 guidelines and provides clear usage instructions.


41-52: LGTM! Robust dependency validation.

The implementation properly validates all required dependencies with clear error reporting.


114-127: LGTM! Proper error handling for makefile linting.

The implementation includes:

  1. Proper validation of tool path
  2. Clear error reporting with context
  3. Safe handling of file paths

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - fixed line numebrs in diognostics

Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - fixed a typo
 - fixed line numbers in diognostics
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (2)

26-37: Consider enhancing apt-get error handling.

While the error handling is good, the immediate exit on apt-get update failure could be too strict. Consider capturing and reporting the update error instead.

-          sudo apt-get update || exit 1
+          sudo apt-get update || { print_error "Package update failed." 26 26; exit 1; }

77-81: Add error handling for file discovery.

The markdown file discovery process lacks error handling.

         run: |
+          if ! FILES=$(git ls-files --exclude-standard -z -- *.md **/*.md 2>&1); then
+            printf "::error file=.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml,line=80,endLine=80,title=FILE_ERROR::Failed to list markdown files: %s\n" "${FILES}"
+            exit 1
+          fi
-          git ls-files --exclude-standard -z -- *.md **/*.md |\
-          xargs -0 -I{} npm run lint:md -- "{}";
+          echo "${FILES}" | xargs -0 -I{} npm run lint:md -- "{}" || exit 1
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (1)

114-127: Consider improving error handling and reducing duplication.

  1. The print_error function is duplicated. Consider moving it to a shared script.
  2. The linting error handling could be more detailed.
-          "$TOOL_PATH" "${FILE}" || { print_error "Linting failed." 127 127; exit 1; } ;
+          if ! LINT_ERROR=$("$TOOL_PATH" "${FILE}" 2>&1); then
+            print_error "Linting failed: ${LINT_ERROR}" 127 127
+            exit 1
+          fi
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01e224d and b56b73b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (4 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
📓 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers scripts to include explicit data processing steps that produce the expected output, ensuring accurate and useful results.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:50.461Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to specify the full raw URL when fetching files from gists to ensure correct retrieval of content, particularly when the file is in markdown format.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T04:45:25.464Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, avoiding raw source code dumps, and focusing on clear explanations and real-world examples.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: LICENSE.md:36-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T07:03:35.207Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that I verify URLs before suggesting changes, and avoid raising hypothetical issues without verification.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T08:20:59.928Z
Learning: When implementing package.json, reactive-firewall prefers to maintain flexibility in npm installation methods, supporting both global (-g) installations and local project-specific installations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T01:10:18.136Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, following the project's style and conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/check_pip:259-265
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:32:16.878Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that code changes adhere to SOLID design principles, specifically avoiding unnecessary complexity (AHA principle), maintaining the Single Responsibility Principle, and ensuring complex work is done on separate development branches (Open/Closed Principle).
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:34-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T09:46:47.010Z
Learning: For future scripts in workflow files (e.g., `.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml`), reactive-firewall prefers concise code and avoids unnecessary variable assignments when possible, such as using `${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}` directly without assigning it to another variable.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-12-03T03:18:50.682Z
Learning: In `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, reactive-firewall intentionally uses the regex pattern `if [[ "${YAML_ARGS}" =~ ^*[!a-zA-Z0-9\ \-\.]*$ ]]; then` for validation and prefers to keep it as is.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
🪛 GitHub Check: makefile-lint
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml

[notice] 67-67: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings

🪛 GitHub Check: markdown-lint
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

[notice] 53-53: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings

🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)

28-35: Well-structured error reporting function!

The print_error function follows best practices with proper parameter handling and POSIX-compliant output formatting.


42-54: Secure and well-structured YAML_ARGS validation!

The implementation properly validates input and safely handles arguments using an array.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: markdown-lint

[notice] 53-53: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings


66-75: Excellent NPM error handling implementation!

The error handling captures and reports npm errors effectively, with proper context and clear messaging.

.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3)

3-16: Excellent function documentation!

The documentation follows CEP-7 guidelines and provides clear, comprehensive information about the function's purpose and usage.


41-52: Consider enhancing apt-get error handling.

While the error handling is good, the immediate exit on apt-get update failure could be too strict. Consider capturing and reporting the update error instead.


56-68: Consistent YAML_ARGS validation implementation!

The validation logic matches the markdown-lint workflow, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: makefile-lint

[notice] 67-67: Validation
Validating workflow with args: -f github --config-file .yamllint.conf --no-warnings

Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:
 - simplify yaml-linting in makeile-lint.yml
Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:
 - back to maintainable state hopefully 🙈
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (1)

105-118: Consider consolidating duplicate print_error functions.

The print_error function is duplicated. Consider moving it to a shared location or defining it once at the workflow level.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b56b73b and 15e16e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (4 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (1)

Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.

  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's ${{ ... }} syntax in conditionals.
  • 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid ${{ ... }} syntax.
📓 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers scripts to include explicit data processing steps that produce the expected output, ensuring accurate and useful results.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:50.461Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T02:05:08.096Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to specify the full raw URL when fetching files from gists to ensure correct retrieval of content, particularly when the file is in markdown format.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T04:45:25.464Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, avoiding raw source code dumps, and focusing on clear explanations and real-world examples.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: LICENSE.md:36-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T07:03:35.207Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that I verify URLs before suggesting changes, and avoid raising hypothetical issues without verification.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T08:20:59.928Z
Learning: When implementing package.json, reactive-firewall prefers to maintain flexibility in npm installation methods, supporting both global (-g) installations and local project-specific installations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T01:10:18.136Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers documentation to be presented in a tone appropriate for developers, following the project's style and conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/check_pip:259-265
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:32:16.878Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers that code changes adhere to SOLID design principles, specifically avoiding unnecessary complexity (AHA principle), maintaining the Single Responsibility Principle, and ensuring complex work is done on separate development branches (Open/Closed Principle).
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:29:55.563Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:34-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T09:46:47.010Z
Learning: For future scripts in workflow files (e.g., `.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml`), reactive-firewall prefers concise code and avoids unnecessary variable assignments when possible, such as using `${{ vars.YAML_ARGS }}` directly without assigning it to another variable.
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:39-39
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:46.501Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall may handle regressions caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, and prefers that suggestions consider potential issues with this variable.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-12-03T03:18:50.682Z
Learning: In `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, reactive-firewall intentionally uses the regex pattern `if [[ "${YAML_ARGS}" =~ ^*[!a-zA-Z0-9\ \-\.]*$ ]]; then` for validation and prefers to keep it as is.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml

57-57: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml

43-43: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (4)

28-35: LGTM! Well-structured error handling function.

The print_error function follows good practices:

  • Uses POSIX-compliant printf
  • Provides clear error message formatting
  • Includes file and line information for better debugging

36-37: LGTM! Proper error handling for installations.

The error handling is well-implemented:

  • Uses the print_error function consistently
  • Provides clear error messages
  • Uses appropriate exit codes

48-53: ⚠️ Potential issue

Quote YAML_ARGS to prevent word splitting.

The yamllint command has unquoted arguments which could lead to word splitting.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-          yamllint ${YAML_ARGS} .markdownlint.yaml
+          yamllint "${YAML_ARGS}" .markdownlint.yaml
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


40-45: ⚠️ Potential issue

Quote YAML_ARGS to prevent word splitting.

The yamllint command has unquoted arguments which could lead to word splitting.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-          yamllint ${YAML_ARGS} .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml
+          yamllint "${YAML_ARGS}" .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#227
File: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml:36-48
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T10:13:52.507Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that in `.github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml`, issues may be caused by `${YAML_ARGS}` being incorrectly set, leading to regressions that require adjustments beyond quoting or validation logic.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

43-43: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

.github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml (3)

3-16: LGTM! Well-documented function.

The documentation follows CEP-7 guidelines and provides clear information about:

  • Function purpose
  • Arguments and their usage
  • Output format

42-52: LGTM! Consistent error handling implementation.

The print_error function is well-implemented:

  • Follows the documented interface
  • Uses POSIX-compliant commands
  • Provides appropriate error handling for each tool

55-59: ⚠️ Potential issue

Quote YAML_ARGS to prevent word splitting.

The yamllint command has unquoted arguments which could lead to word splitting.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-          yamllint ${YAML_ARGS} .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml
+          yamllint "${YAML_ARGS}" .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

57-57: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:10: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall merged commit 31b604e into master Dec 4, 2024
138 checks passed
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall deleted the patch-validate-yaml_args-196 branch December 4, 2024 05:16
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
19 tasks
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2024
22 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration Tooling Configs Improvements or additions to configuration GitHub Anything Meta JavaScript Changes to npm stuff Linter Any linter tool or setting file enhancements Make Lang Changes to makefiles Testing Something can be verified
Projects
None yet
1 participant