[TESTING] implementing basic fuzzing in test #139
Conversation
Changes in file tests/requirements.txt: added hypothisis for fuzzing New file tests/test_fuzz.py: - Implements initial idea from #13
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)
📓 Learnings (2)
🪛 Ruff
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/requirements.txt (2)
42-43: LGTM! Consider updating documentation for the new dependency.The addition of the 'hypothesis' package aligns well with the PR objective of implementing basic fuzzing in tests. The version constraint and license information are appropriately noted.
Consider updating the project's documentation to reflect the addition of this new testing dependency and any potential limitations regarding Docker deployments due to its MPL2 license.
Environment Missing Critical Dependencies
The verification process cannot proceed because
pip,pytest, andpythonare not installed or accessible in the current environment. Please ensure these tools are properly set up to verify compatibility with the specified setuptools versions.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
27-27: LGTM! Verify compatibility with excluded versions.The updated 'setuptools' dependency with specific version constraints looks good. This change aligns with the project's emphasis on portability in test code.
To ensure compatibility, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility with the specified setuptools versions # Test: Check if the project works with the allowed setuptools versions pip install setuptools==38.0 pytest pip install setuptools==71.0.0 pytest pip install setuptools==72.1.0 pytest pip install setuptools==69.5.0 pytest pip install setuptools==60.4.0 pytest pip install setuptools==59.2.0 pytest echo "If all tests pass, the project is compatible with the specified setuptools versions."Length of output: 1142
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if pip and pytest are installed # Check for pip if command -v pip &> /dev/null then echo "pip is installed." else echo "pip is not installed." fi # Check for pytest if command -v pytest &> /dev/null then echo "pytest is installed." else echo "pytest is not installed." fiLength of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for alternative pip commands, virtual environments, Python version, and available package managers # Check for pip3 if command -v pip3 &> /dev/null then echo "pip3 is installed." else echo "pip3 is not installed." fi # Check for pytest3 if command -v pytest3 &> /dev/null then echo "pytest3 is installed." else echo "pytest3 is not installed." fi # Check for active virtual environment if [ -n "$VIRTUAL_ENV" ]; then echo "A virtual environment is active: $VIRTUAL_ENV" else echo "No virtual environment is active." fi # Check Python version python_version=$(python --version 2>&1) echo "Python version: $python_version" # Check for alternative package managers if command -v conda &> /dev/null then echo "Conda is installed." else echo "Conda is not installed." fi if command -v poetry &> /dev/null then echo "Poetry is installed." else echo "Poetry is not installed." fiLength of output: 707
tests/test_fuzz.py (1)
85-94: Clarify repeated calls to 'doStep' with identical argumentsThe
doStepmethod is called three times with the same arguments. If intentional to simulate multiple sends, consider adding a comment to explain this. If not, it may be redundant and could be simplified.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
- tests/test_fuzz.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/requirements.txt (2)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
- As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
Pattern
tests/requirements.txt: * The multicast's own project dependencies are recorded in './requirements.txt' for production code.
- The multicast's own project testing dependencies are recorded in 'tests/requirements.txt' for testing the project.
Consider these the records of truth regarding project dependencies.tests/test_fuzz.py (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
- As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🪛 Ruff
tests/test_fuzz.py
34-34: Local variable
ImportErris assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
ImportErr(F841)
43-43:
context.subprocessimported but unusedRemove unused import:
context.subprocess(F401)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/requirements.txt (1)
Line range hint
55-55: LGTM! Verify compatibility with pytest 8.1.0.The updates to 'pytest' and 'pytest-flake8' dependencies look good. These changes likely address compatibility issues or incorporate new features.
To ensure the exclusion of pytest 8.1.0 is necessary, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility issues with pytest 8.1.0 # Test: Check if the project works with pytest 8.1.0 pip install pytest==8.1.0 pytest echo "If tests fail, the exclusion of pytest 8.1.0 is justified. Otherwise, consider removing the exclusion."Also applies to: 59-59
❌ 1 Tests Failed:
View the top 1 failed tests by shortest run time
To view individual test run time comparison to the main branch, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard |
Changes in file tests/test_fuzz.py: - added docstrings
Changes in file tests/test_fuzz.py: - use self.assertIsInstance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_fuzz.py (2)
41-43: Remove unused import 'subprocess'The
subprocessmodule is imported but not used in this file. Consider removing this import to keep the imports clean and relevant.from context import multicast # pylint: disable=cyclic-import - skipcq: PYL-R0401 from context import unittest - from context import subprocess from hypothesis import given, strategies as st
72-83: Consider using a more Pythonic method nameThe method name
_always_generate_random_port_WHEN_calleduses all caps for some words, which is not typical Python naming convention. Consider using a more Pythonic name like_generate_random_port. However, if this is a project-specific naming convention, please disregard this suggestion.@staticmethod - def _always_generate_random_port_WHEN_called(): + def _generate_random_port(): """ Generates a pseudo-random port number within the dynamic/private port range.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/test_fuzz.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/test_fuzz.py (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
- As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.tests/test_fuzz.py (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139 File: tests/test_fuzz.py:34-36 Timestamp: 2024-09-30T08:27:11.794Z Learning: In this codebase, assigning an exception object to a variable (e.g., `ImportErr`) and then deleting it is an intentional practice to "cleanup any error leaks early," and should not be flagged as unnecessary.
🪛 Ruff
tests/test_fuzz.py
34-34: Local variable
ImportErris assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
ImportErr(F841)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/test_fuzz.py (1)
1-147: Overall implementation looks goodThe implementation of fuzz testing using the Hypothesis library is well-structured and should effectively test the multicast functionality with random binary data. The error handling is thorough, and the code is well-documented. The suggestions provided earlier are minor and aimed at improving code clarity and safety. Great job on implementing this fuzz testing suite!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
34-34: Local variable
ImportErris assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
ImportErr(F841)
### ChangeLog:
Changes in file tests/check_legacy_setup_coverage:
printf "%s\n" "" >> ${_TEST_ROOT_DIR}/${LOG_FILE} ; wait ;
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/check_legacy_setup_coverage (1)
173-180: LGTM with a minor suggestion for clarity.The changes improve the script's portability by accommodating different coverage command options. This is a good approach. However, to enhance clarity and maintainability, consider extracting the common parts of the commands into variables.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
# Define common parts COVERAGE_COMBINE_CMD="coverage combine" COVERAGE_XML_CMD="coverage xml --include=setup.py,multicast -o ${_TEST_ROOT_DIR}/test-reports/coverage_setup.xml" # Use the commands if [[ ( -x $(command -v python3) ) ]] ; then python3 -m ${COVERAGE_COMBINE_CMD} 2>${_TEST_ROOT_DIR}/${ERR_FILE} || EXIT_CODE=2 ; python3 -m ${COVERAGE_XML_CMD} || EXIT_CODE=2 ; elif [[ ( -x $(command -v coverage) ) ]] ; then ${COVERAGE_COMBINE_CMD} 2>${_TEST_ROOT_DIR}/${ERR_FILE} || EXIT_CODE=2 ; ${COVERAGE_XML_CMD} || EXIT_CODE=2 ; fiThis refactoring reduces duplication and makes it easier to modify the commands in the future if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/check_legacy_setup_coverage (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
tests/check_legacy_setup_coverage (1)
Pattern
tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
- As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/CI.md:32-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110 File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".Learnt from: reactive-firewall PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118 File: tests/check_pip:92-197 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/check_legacy_setup_coverage (2)
180-180: LGTM!This line correctly generates the XML coverage report when the
coveragecommand is available. It's consistent with the corresponding line in thepython3block and maintains proper error handling.
Line range hint
1-180: Overall improvements enhance script portability and robustness.The changes made to this script have successfully improved its portability by accommodating different coverage command options. The error handling and logging mechanisms have been refined, maintaining the script's original structure and purpose while enhancing its functionality.
The script adheres to the project's coding guidelines for test files, prioritizing portability over clarity while still maintaining readability. The modifications align well with the script's primary goal of ensuring comprehensive coverage testing for the
setup.pyfile.To ensure the script functions as intended across different environments, consider running the following verification:
This verification will help ensure that the script works correctly with both
python3andcoveragecommands, and that it generates the expected output files.
### ChangeLog: Changes in file tests/test_fuzz.py: class HypothesisTestSuite(context.BasicUsageTestSuite):
--hexfeature for interpreting messages as hex strings #140Changes in file tests/requirements.txt:
added hypothisis for fuzzing
New file tests/test_fuzz.py:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
hypothesispackage.Bug Fixes
Tests