Skip to content

Implemented check_pip (- WIP #99 -) #123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Collaborator

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 21, 2024


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a shell script for auditing and validating Python requirements files for security vulnerabilities and license compliance.
    • Added functionality to auto-correct auditing issues when the --fix argument is used.
    • Enhanced GitHub Actions workflow with new jobs for setup, pip testing, and documentation generation.
  • Chores

    • Implemented a mechanism to prevent concurrent executions of the script.
    • Enhanced the execution environment setup for improved reliability and safety.
    • Updated workflow configuration for comprehensive testing across multiple environments.

Changes in file tests/check_pip:
 New tool to use pip-audit/pip-licenses to check requirement.txt files
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Sep 21, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall linked an issue Sep 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions github-actions bot added Linter Any linter tool or setting file enhancements Testing Something can be verified labels Sep 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a shell script that audits and validates Python requirements files using tools like pip-audit and pip-licenses. It ensures a safe execution environment, checks for necessary commands, and implements a lock file to prevent concurrent runs. The script identifies requirements files, audits them for vulnerabilities and license issues, and can auto-correct with a --fix argument. Cleanup procedures are included to manage environment variables and exit codes based on the success of the operations. Additionally, the GitHub Actions workflow is enhanced with new jobs for testing and documentation generation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tests/check_pip Introduced a shell script for auditing Python requirements files using pip-audit and pip-licenses. Implemented checks for command availability, lock file mechanism, auditing functionality, and cleanup procedures.
.github/workflows/Tests.yml Modified GitHub Actions workflow to add new jobs (EXTRAS-FOR-SETUP, EXTRAS-FOR-PIP, and DOCS) for enhanced testing and documentation generation across multiple environments.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement Dependency Security and Update Checks (#99)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Documentation

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where bunnies play,
A script was born to keep risks at bay.
With audits and checks, it hops with glee,
Ensuring our packages are safe as can be!
So let’s celebrate this change today,
For a brighter, safer coding way! 🌟


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 048f3bf and 92b3e0a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/Tests.yml (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/CI.md:32-32
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/Tests.yml (5)

Line range hint 481-551: LGTM! Well-structured job for testing legacy setup.

The EXTRAS-FOR-SETUP job is a valuable addition to the workflow. It:

  • Tests across multiple OS (ubuntu and macOS) and Python versions (3.10, 3.11, 3.12).
  • Depends on BOOTSTRAP and MATS jobs, ensuring proper sequencing.
  • Runs legacy setup coverage tests, which is crucial for maintaining backwards compatibility.

This job enhances the overall test coverage and helps catch potential issues related to the setup process.


Line range hint 554-625: LGTM! Comprehensive job for testing pip-related functionality.

The EXTRAS-FOR-PIP job is a well-structured addition to the workflow:

  • It maintains consistency with the EXTRAS-FOR-SETUP job, which is good for maintainability.
  • Tests across multiple OS (ubuntu and macOS) and Python versions (3.10, 3.11, 3.12).
  • Focuses on pip-related functionality by running the check_pip script.
  • Depends on BOOTSTRAP and MATS jobs, ensuring proper sequencing.

This job enhances the workflow by specifically targeting pip-related tests, which is crucial for package management and distribution.


626-678: LGTM! Excellent job for documentation generation and artifact upload.

The DOCS job is a crucial addition to the workflow:

  • Runs on all major OS platforms (ubuntu, macOS, Windows) and recent Python versions (3.10, 3.11, 3.12), ensuring wide compatibility.
  • Depends on MATS, COVERAGE, EXTRAS-FOR-SETUP, and EXTRAS-FOR-PIP jobs, ensuring documentation is only generated after successful tests and checks.
  • Generates documentation and uploads it as an artifact, making it easily accessible for review or deployment.

This job significantly enhances the project's maintainability by ensuring up-to-date and accessible documentation.


687-687: Good update: TOX job now uses Python 3.12

The TOX job has been updated to use Python 3.12, which is a positive change. This ensures that the project is tested against the latest Python version, helping to maintain compatibility and leverage new language features.


Line range hint 1-719: Excellent improvements to the CI/CD workflow

The changes to this workflow file significantly enhance the project's CI/CD process:

  1. New jobs (EXTRAS-FOR-SETUP, EXTRAS-FOR-PIP, DOCS) add comprehensive testing for setup, pip functionality, and documentation generation.
  2. Consistent job structure across new and existing jobs improves maintainability.
  3. Wide coverage across multiple OS platforms and Python versions ensures broad compatibility.
  4. Update to Python 3.12 in the TOX job keeps the project current with the latest Python release.

These improvements will lead to better code quality, more reliable releases, and up-to-date documentation. Great work on enhancing the development process!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access (new models): enabled

We are currently testing new code review model(s) that may lead to higher noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/check_pip (1)

185-191: Unset environment variables securely

At the end of the script, environment variables are unset using unset VAR 2>/dev/null || : ;. The use of 2>/dev/null || : is unnecessary.

Simplify the unsetting of variables:

-unset _TEST_ROOT_DIR 2>/dev/null || : ;
-unset AUDIT_OPTIONS 2>/dev/null || : ;
-unset LICENSE_OPTIONS 2>/dev/null || : ;
+unset _TEST_ROOT_DIR
+unset AUDIT_OPTIONS
+unset LICENSE_OPTIONS
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de67edb and 21f71a7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/check_pip (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
tests/check_pip (1)

Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test-code for this project,

  1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
  2. As a general guideline, consider the code-style advocated in the PEP-8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code-style compliance.
  3. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
  4. As a project rule, python source files, with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's unit-testing code.
  5. As a project rule, any files with names prefixed by the string "check_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's non-unit testing code. "Non-unit testing" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit-testing, such as (but NOT limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. . It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as bash shell-scripts.
Learnings (1)
Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/CI.md:32-32
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/check_pip (1)

102-102: Ensure 'tool_shlock_helper.sh' is correctly sourced

In line 102, the script attempts to hash shlock using a local script. This may not be portable and could cause issues if the script is missing or not executable.

Verify that tool_shlock_helper.sh exists in the .github directory and is executable. Consider sourcing the script instead:

-hash -p ./.github/tool_shlock_helper.sh shlock || exit 255 ;
+source ./.github/tool_shlock_helper.sh || exit 255

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.158%. Comparing base (de67edb) to head (92b3e0a).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #123   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   97.158%   97.158%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          387       387           
  Branches        35        35           
=========================================
  Hits           376       376           
  Misses           7         7           
  Partials         4         4           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 97.090% <ø> (ø)
3.11 97.090% <ø> (ø)
3.12 97.090% <ø> (ø)
3.7 86.819% <ø> (ø)
3.8 86.932% <ø> (ø)
3.9 86.932% <ø> (ø)
macos-13 88.114% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest 97.090% <ø> (ø)
multicast 97.158% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest 97.158% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest 84.755% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de67edb...92b3e0a. Read the comment docs.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added the Bash Lang Changes to the BASH scripts label Sep 23, 2024
@reactive-firewall

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as resolved.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2024
added correct description of the new check_pip script
…e testing (- WIP #99 & PR #123 -)

Changes in file .github/workflows/Tests.yml:
 - Added new tests for docs and requirements to GHA CI config
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall merged commit 277aa58 into master Sep 23, 2024
236 checks passed
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall deleted the feature-150-99-implement-5 branch September 23, 2024 06:55
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
6 tasks
This was referenced Oct 12, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2025
1 task
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2025
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bash Lang Changes to the BASH scripts Linter Any linter tool or setting file enhancements Testing Something can be verified
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement Dependency Security and Update Checks
1 participant