Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 1, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@louisfeng
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
Added a numerical equivalence check to this test case which checks that both the original and optimized graph return the same result for the same input.

Fixes T54749244

Test Plan:

=> ctest -R GraphOptz
Test project /Users/lofe/git/glow/build_Debug
Start 8: GraphOptzTest
1/1 Test #8: GraphOptzTest .................... Passed 0.09 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1

Total Test time (real) = 0.10 sec

Copy link

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SplitInfinity has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

@SplitInfinity merged this pull request in a0d7352.

vdantu pushed a commit to vdantu/glow that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2020
…rch#3581)

Summary:
Added a numerical equivalence check to this test case which checks that both the original and optimized graph return the same result for the same input.

Fixes T54749244
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#3581

Test Plan:
=> ctest -R GraphOptz
Test project /Users/lofe/git/glow/build_Debug
    Start 8: GraphOptzTest
1/1 Test pytorch#8: GraphOptzTest ....................   Passed    0.09 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1

Total Test time (real) =   0.10 sec

Differential Revision: D17702016

Pulled By: SplitInfinity

fbshipit-source-id: 809aad9ddbb5caa10809cbc83ab0871511add015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants