-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.6k
bpo-29816: Shift operation now has less opportunity to raise OverflowError. #680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
serhiy-storchaka
merged 7 commits into
python:master
from
serhiy-storchaka:long-shift-overflow
Mar 30, 2017
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
60c20cf
bpo-29816: Shift operation now has less opportunity to raise Overflow…
serhiy-storchaka d0fcb3d
Don't raise OverflowError in shift operations if the result is repres…
serhiy-storchaka 7edc7f8
Use "%" rather than "*" and "-".
serhiy-storchaka a3d415d
Share code between left and rigth shifts.
serhiy-storchaka 0c22c82
Use Python int arithmetic rather than C long long arithmetic.
serhiy-storchaka 6419d89
Merge branch 'master' into long-shift-overflow
serhiy-storchaka 926be7c
Merge branch 'master' into long-shift-overflow
serhiy-storchaka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not
loshift = shiftby % PyLong_SHIFT;
?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left shift uses such code. I suppose this is because multiplication and substraction are faster than the "%" operation. If there is a reason to use it for left shift, there is a reason to use it for right shift.
The new code for left and right shifts are almost exact duplicates (there is additional optimization for right shift, but it is not very important and can be omitted). Is it worth to extract it in the helper function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems unlikely to me. In particular, I'd expect an optimising compiler to be able to recognise and do a good job of optimising the pair
shiftby / PyLong_SHIFT
andshiftby % PyLong_SHIFT
if they appear next to each other in code. Rewriting the%
would likely make it harder for the compiler to recognise.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds reasonable to me, if you want to do it; if you don't, that also sounds reasonable to me. :-)