Git LFS budget exceeded #151710
-
Select Topic AreaQuestion BodyHi, I have recently created a new profile and a new organization and I have created a couple of new repositories. The project I have in one of them is 1.7GB aprox so I installed and "activated" Git LFS. However, when I try to push to this repo, i get the following error: I had a look at how to increase the budget for LFS but I cannot see the Git LFS Data section in my Billing tab in my organization profile (link below). Is it because I made this organization just a few days ago? I am just asking because I am in another organization and I can see the Git LFS data section if I log in using that other organzation.... The only options I can see when using this new organization is to upgrade to a Teams or Enterprise plans. Is this the new purchasing models Github has? Is there no option to upgrade only LFS if you don´t have a Teams or Enterprise plan (i.e. you are on a Free plan)? Thanks! Daniel |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 18 comments 30 replies
-
Hi @DaniGabana ,
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is there any update? I am in a similar situation, Usage shows up on one of my older organizations, but not on the newer one. Buying the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, The issue is fixed for me. I had the same issue as everyone in here: a new organization but couldn't push any gut LFS to it. I tried everything, I tried removing budget limits, I even tried to increase the budget and nothing worked but after I contacted the support they get back to me telling me that the budget team had a bug and that they fixed it and that it should be fixed now which was true I could push my git lfs right after it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 we've migrated a repo to a new Organization account and now cannot push or pull because of "This repository exceeded its LFS budget." Can someone from Github please provide an update on this bug (and a global fix or workaround?) Very annoying! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have tried again today and I was able to successfully push to the new free organization. I do have the "Include Git LFS objects in archives " option enabled (I had it before and didn't work). Maybe this was a temporary issue and is now solved? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Having the same issue as this, please fix this asap. I have raised multiple support tickets about this but no response from GitHub team for 4 days. It is almost definitely a bug with some record in your DB causing this for us -- no matter what card I use and what budget I set for LFS, I get the same error as everyone else above. We literally cannot push to production because of this! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is no solution. I even reset the history in the hardest possible way because I couldn't reset it locally. I was forced to create a new branch from the desired commit and make it the default, deleting the original dev branch. I've spent the whole day and all my mental capacity trying to make a build with three features we were working on for the whole week, but nothing worked. All because, for some absolutely idiotic reason, you removed the ability to pay 5 bucks to save me the day. Thanks a lot. From now on, I'm switching to GitLab for all my accounts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Agree with @isekaiinteractive above. This is actually preposterous -- GitHub just refuses to take my money! Even if it's a bug on your end, that's OK, if customer support was fast and resolved the issue immediately. I've left FIVE follow ups on this problem and nobody from support has reached out, let alone fix it. This transition has been very poorly handled. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So according to these docs: https://docs.github.com/en/billing/using-the-new-billing-platform/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage#managing-your-budget-for-git-large-file-storage
Apparently that is not the case. We apparently just got migrated and everything started falling over left and right because the budget was set to $0 and overspending was not allowed. We usually bought a couple of TB of extra bandwidth each month. So for anyone else hitting this in the future with org accounts, go into "Billding and licensing" => "Budget and alerts" and then edit the budget for LFS (Or disable the limit entirely which is what we have done for now) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I was hit by this, and despite tweaking my settings, not able to upload. Then I found this text here:
I have added lfs to my fork of this repo. But I can't push anymore, because the original forked repo does not have a LFS budget. I'm really not sure how to proceed here!... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Same here, Added LFS Budget, but my collaborators can't clone because "This repository exceeded its LFS budget. The account responsible for the budget should increase it to restore access." |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Possible solution: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I was just hit by the LFS budget limit issue, on a repo that has existed for a long time, in an organisation that has also existed for a long time. I solved it with unchecking the "stop when budget exceeded", as pointed out above. But I think there is a real problem with the way this feature is implemented, because I got the error when cloning a public repo:
This means that anyone external who cloned this repo would also get the same error, with absolutely no way to fix this (because they are not in the organisation that owns this repo). I can imagine that the budget would be enforced for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey folks! Thanks to everyone who wrote in (and to Support), shared workarounds, and kept reporting this. GitHub has transitioned from spending limits to budgets as part of the new billing platform. Instead of setting a spending limit, you now configure a budget for specific services like GitHub Actions, Codespaces, and LFS. By default, the LFS budget for non-Enterprise accounts are set to $0.
You can learn more about the new billing platform here: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Running into a similar but different issue. We moved an org under an Enterprise. Now the org's budgets should be managed by the enterprise budgets, but since there were budgets on the org level before these are still there. We can't change the org budget because it doesn't have a payment method associated with it, and when we try to add one it says it's managed by the enterprise (which does have a payment method). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think this is the worst way to make an update! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Billing becomes too complicated to understand. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In order to fix this, I had to change my budget from 0 to $1. Even though we weren't using any money from the budget, since 0 was the max and it was at 0, it was causing it to fail. Afterwards, it worked immediately. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hey folks!
Thanks to everyone who wrote in (and to Support), shared workarounds, and kept reporting this.
GitHub has transitioned from spending limits to budgets as part of the new billing platform. Instead of setting a spending limit, you now configure a budget for specific services like GitHub Actions, Codespaces, and LFS.
By default, the LFS budget for non-Enterprise accounts are set to $0.
included
amounts of LFS bandwidth and storage have significantly increased, you can read more about what’s included in your plan here.included
limit for your plan, you’ll need to edit the $0 budget to allow additional usage:Editing a budget