Avoid public APIs with internal params in custom Options

[bogdandrutu]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.00990% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.82%. Comparing base (64954f4) to head (c10de5d).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
exporter/exporterhelper/common.go	97.14%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11054      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.84%   91.82%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         415      415              
  Lines       19850    19905      +55     
==========================================
+ Hits        18232    18278      +46     
- Misses       1245     1252       +7     
- Partials      373      375       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[atoulme]

I think ideally those tests would be tested with a test using a different package name to make sure we can validate the APIs work outside of the module.