Publish version v0.2.29

[Kitenite]

Description

Related Issues

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Documentation update
• Release
• Refactor
• Other (please describe):

Testing

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional Notes

---

Important

Update version in package.json to 0.2.29 for new release.

• Release:
  • Update version in package.json from 0.2.27 to 0.2.29 for new release.

^{This description was created by for 8e060c6. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to d1d5033 in 33 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. apps/studio/package.json:4

• Draft comment:
  Version bump updated to 0.2.28 for release. However, the PR description suggests onboarding docs improvements which are not reflected here. Ensure that documentation changes are included if required.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that documentation changes are included if required, which is similar to asking them to double-check or ensure something. This violates the rule against asking the PR author to ensure the behavior is intended or to update the PR description.

2. apps/studio/package.json:4

• Draft comment:
  The PR description mentions adding onboarding docs, but the diff only shows a version bump. Confirm that the intended documentation changes are included.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment asks the PR author to confirm their intention regarding the PR description and the changes included. It violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or update the PR description.

3. apps/studio/package.json:30

• Draft comment:
  Typo found in the 'scripts' section: the script key 'pree2e' on line 30 might be a typographical error. It appears that it could be intended to be 'pre:e2e' or another variant. Please confirm and correct if necessary.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_Nd6j63Xb6nwzEngR

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed 8e060c6 in 1 minute and 15 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. apps/studio/package.json:4

• Draft comment:
  Version bump to 0.2.29 noted. The PR description mentions onboarding docs improvements (Next.js, Remix, etc.) but no related documentation changes are present. Also, the commit title references v0.2.28. Ensure the intended docs updates are included and version info is consistent.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the intended documentation updates are included and that version information is consistent. This falls under asking the author to ensure behavior is intended and to update the PR description, which violates the rules.

2. apps/studio/package.json:4

• Draft comment:
  Version bump inconsistency: PR title mentions v0.2.28 but package version updated to 0.2.29.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% Version bumps are typically intentional and carefully considered. The PR title might be outdated or there could be valid reasons for the version difference. This feels like asking the author to explain their intention, which violates our rules. Additionally, version management is often handled by release processes and shouldn't be micromanaged in PR reviews. The version mismatch could indicate a real problem with release tracking or versioning. Maybe this needs coordination with other packages or release processes. While version tracking is important, this comment is essentially asking the author to explain their intention or verify the version choice, which explicitly violates our review rules. The comment should be deleted as it violates our rule against asking authors to explain their intentions or verify their changes.

3. apps/studio/package.json:4

• Draft comment:
  PR claims to resolve issue 123 (improve onboarding docs) but no documentation changes are present.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to update the PR description or to ensure that the PR aligns with the description, which is against the rules. It does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.

4. apps/studio/package.json:30

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected in the npm script name 'pree2e'. Please check if this was intended, or if it should be corrected (e.g., 'pre:e2e' or 'preE2e') to adhere to naming conventions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_CxObYO5fU7QQ6gcj

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}