PE: fix TLS raw data parser #473
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-Authored-By: Jorge Alejandro Durán Royo <[email protected]>
m4b
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2025
Owner
m4b
left a comment
m4b
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thank you! would be nice to have a test showing regression won't return, but maybe follow up
Owner
|
NB: nonbreaking |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In favor to #458, I parted the change specifics to the possible TLS parser panic to this PR.
TlsData::raw_datacan beNoneso instead of raising a malformed error if the address does not exists or does not lies in the binary, I made it simplyNone.