Skip to content

[RISCV] Add processor definition for SpacemiT-X60 #94564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
57 changes: 57 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/Driver/riscv-cpus.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,6 +31,63 @@
// MCPU-XIANGSHAN-NANHU-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zks" "-target-feature" "+zksed" "-target-feature" "+zksh" "-target-feature" "+svinval"
// MCPU-XIANGSHAN-NANHU-SAME: "-target-abi" "lp64d"

// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -### -c %s 2>&1 -mcpu=spacemit-x60 | FileCheck -check-prefix=MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60 %s
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60: "-nostdsysteminc" "-target-cpu" "spacemit-x60"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+m"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+a"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+f"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+d"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+c"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+v"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zic64b"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicbom"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicbop"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicboz"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+ziccamoa"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+ziccif"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicclsm"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+ziccrse"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicntr"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicond"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zicsr"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zifencei"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zihintpause"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zihpm"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zmmul"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+za64rs"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zfh"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zfhmin"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zba"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zbb"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zbc"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zbkc"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zbs"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zkt"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zve32f"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zve32x"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zve64d"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zve64f"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zve64x"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvfh"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvfhmin"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvkt"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvl128b"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvl256b"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvl32b"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+zvl64b"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+ssccptr"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+sscofpmf"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+sscounterenw"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+sstc"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+sstvala"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+sstvecd"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+svade"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+svbare"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+svinval"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+svnapot"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-feature" "+svpbmt"
// MCPU-SPACEMIT-X60-SAME: "-target-abi" "lp64d"

// We cannot check much for -mcpu=native, but it should be replaced by a valid CPU string.
// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -### -c %s -mcpu=native 2> %t.err || true
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t.err -check-prefix=MCPU-NATIVE %s
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions clang/test/Misc/target-invalid-cpu-note.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,12 +85,12 @@

// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix RISCV64
// RISCV64: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
// RISCV64-NEXT: note: valid target CPU values are: generic-rv64, rocket-rv64, sifive-p450, sifive-p670, sifive-s21, sifive-s51, sifive-s54, sifive-s76, sifive-u54, sifive-u74, sifive-x280, veyron-v1, xiangshan-nanhu{{$}}
// RISCV64-NEXT: note: valid target CPU values are: generic-rv64, rocket-rv64, sifive-p450, sifive-p670, sifive-s21, sifive-s51, sifive-s54, sifive-s76, sifive-u54, sifive-u74, sifive-x280, spacemit-x60, veyron-v1, xiangshan-nanhu{{$}}

// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv32 -tune-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix TUNE-RISCV32
// TUNE-RISCV32: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
// TUNE-RISCV32-NEXT: note: valid target CPU values are: generic-rv32, rocket-rv32, sifive-e20, sifive-e21, sifive-e24, sifive-e31, sifive-e34, sifive-e76, syntacore-scr1-base, syntacore-scr1-max, generic, rocket, sifive-7-series{{$}}

// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -tune-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix TUNE-RISCV64
// TUNE-RISCV64: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
// TUNE-RISCV64-NEXT: note: valid target CPU values are: generic-rv64, rocket-rv64, sifive-p450, sifive-p670, sifive-s21, sifive-s51, sifive-s54, sifive-s76, sifive-u54, sifive-u74, sifive-x280, veyron-v1, xiangshan-nanhu, generic, rocket, sifive-7-series{{$}}
// TUNE-RISCV64-NEXT: note: valid target CPU values are: generic-rv64, rocket-rv64, sifive-p450, sifive-p670, sifive-s21, sifive-s51, sifive-s54, sifive-s76, sifive-u54, sifive-u74, sifive-x280, spacemit-x60, veyron-v1, xiangshan-nanhu, generic, rocket, sifive-7-series{{$}}
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVProcessors.td
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -381,3 +381,21 @@ def XIANGSHAN_NANHU : RISCVProcessorModel<"xiangshan-nanhu",
TuneZExtHFusion,
TuneZExtWFusion,
TuneShiftedZExtWFusion]>;

def SPACEMIT_X60 : RISCVProcessorModel<"spacemit-x60",
NoSchedModel,
!listconcat(RVA22S64Features,
[FeatureStdExtV,
FeatureStdExtSscofpmf,
FeatureStdExtSstc,
FeatureStdExtSvnapot,
FeatureStdExtZbc,
FeatureStdExtZbkc,
FeatureStdExtZfh,
FeatureStdExtZicond,
FeatureStdExtZmmul,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't list Zmmul separate from M.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generated "-target-feature" "-zmmul" in clang/test/Driver/riscv-cpus.c.
It seems that M imply Zmmul is not supported yet.
#95070

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generated "-target-feature" "-zmmul" in clang/test/Driver/riscv-cpus.c.
It seems that M imply Zmmul is not supported yet.
#95070

It's not, but what is the benefit to the user to have Zmmul and M both listed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed. Thanks!

FeatureStdExtZvfh,
FeatureStdExtZvfhmin,
FeatureStdExtZvkt,
FeatureStdExtZvl256b]),
[TuneDLenFactor2]>;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does X60 support any macro-fusion?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since no specific information is publicly available, I think this patch can ignore macro-fusion for now