Skip to content

Conversation

@sfleen
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfleen sfleen commented Oct 8, 2025

This also does some considerable refactoring to the trace label population, simplifying the flow and making it much clearer where values are set and overridden by other values.

@sfleen sfleen requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2025 15:30
@olix0r olix0r requested a review from cratelyn October 8, 2025 15:48
@sfleen sfleen force-pushed the sfleen/trace-service-name branch from d1636c5 to cc8be0a Compare October 8, 2025 16:22
This also does some considerable refactoring to the trace label population, simplifying the flow and making it much clearer where values are set and overridden by other values.

Signed-off-by: Scott Fleener <[email protected]>
@sfleen sfleen force-pushed the sfleen/trace-service-name branch from cc8be0a to 9aab0e4 Compare October 8, 2025 16:27
Copy link
Member

@cratelyn cratelyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✨ this is nice! i have some small comments about how these interfaces fit together. i'll couch these comments with a note that the environment code here is lengthy, but these propositions should help cut out some non-local reasoning and help simplify the call-site to create this label set.

Copy link
Member

@cratelyn cratelyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit: 🎉 wahoo!

@sfleen sfleen merged commit 7686225 into main Oct 8, 2025
15 checks passed
@sfleen sfleen deleted the sfleen/trace-service-name branch October 8, 2025 23:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants