Skip to content

Conversation

@hughsimpson
Copy link
Contributor

@hughsimpson hughsimpson commented Mar 2, 2024

I figured maybe it was time to format everything 😅

I've tried to pick a set of configurations that best reflect the predominant coding style across the project, although there is (inevitably!) a lot of inconsistency in the existing codebase.

As long as this pr is merged by a standard merge (rather than a squash) we should ignore the result of the initial scalafmtAll in git blame, because of the inclusion of .git-blame-ignore-revs with a reference to the relevant commit.

I've also added a linting check to the CI jobs to catch out the unwary preserve this beautiful new world.

Over to you, @ivantopo 😄

@hughsimpson hughsimpson merged commit 5327237 into master Mar 4, 2024
@hughsimpson hughsimpson deleted the scalafmt branch March 4, 2024 07:29
@ivantopo
Copy link
Contributor

ivantopo commented Mar 4, 2024

Forgot to comment here besides our chat so yes! Happy to see the entire repo become consistent 😄

@Philippus
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe also add scalafmtSbt to format the *.sbt and project/*.scala files.

@Philippus Philippus mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants