Skip to content

[ES] Refactor DependencyStore to make it reusable for v2 APIs #7044

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2025

Conversation

Manik2708
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Refactoring of Dependnency Store to make it resuable for v2 APIs

How was this change tested?

  • Unit Tests

Checklist

@Manik2708 Manik2708 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 18, 2025 08:21
@Manik2708 Manik2708 requested a review from mahadzaryab1 April 18, 2025 08:21
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.98%. Comparing base (e60b2df) to head (83851be).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7044      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.01%   95.98%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         349      350       +1     
  Lines       20677    20692      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        19852    19861       +9     
- Misses        622      626       +4     
- Partials      203      205       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 9.97% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
badger_v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.00% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.00% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 19.95% <76.19%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.03% <76.19%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 20.20% <76.19%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 11.52% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
grpc_v2 9.14% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v1 10.25% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
memory_v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.08% <76.19%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.08% <76.19%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.07% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
tailsampling-processor 0.56% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 94.73% <80.95%> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code label Apr 18, 2025
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 18, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Apr 18, 2025
@yurishkuro yurishkuro enabled auto-merge April 18, 2025 17:12
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 18, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 18, 2025
@Manik2708
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yurishkuro Tests failed in merge queue, can you please repush to the queue?

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 18, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit 600309a Apr 18, 2025
56 checks passed
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…ertracing#7044)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Fixes a part of jaegertracing#7034 

## Description of the changes
- Refactoring of Dependnency Store to make it resuable for v2 APIs

## How was this change tested?
- Unit Tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…ertracing#7044)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Fixes a part of jaegertracing#7034

## Description of the changes
- Refactoring of Dependnency Store to make it resuable for v2 APIs

## How was this change tested?
- Unit Tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: Manik2708 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants