Skip to content

[grpc][v2] Implement FindTraceIDs in gRPC v2 handler #7003

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

mahadzaryab1
Copy link
Collaborator

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 commented Apr 9, 2025

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Implement the FindTraceIDs call in the gRPC v2 handler

How was this change tested?

  • Added unit tests

Checklist

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added the changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code label Apr 9, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.96%. Comparing base (d12f1f9) to head (b7b5f82).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7003      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.99%   95.96%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         346      346              
  Lines       20507    20569      +62     
==========================================
+ Hits        19686    19739      +53     
- Misses        618      626       +8     
- Partials      203      204       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 10.48% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
badger_v2 2.17% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.77% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.16% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.16% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.77% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.16% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.16% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 20.87% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.95% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 21.13% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.17% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 11.56% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
grpc_v2 8.43% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v1 10.77% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
kafka-3.x-v2 2.17% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
memory_v2 2.17% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1 21.00% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v1 21.00% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.17% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
tailsampling-processor 0.59% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 94.76% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2025 22:23
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2025 22:23
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from pavolloffay April 9, 2025 22:23
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 force-pushed the grpc-server-find-trace-ids branch from 42cffd8 to 78905b2 Compare April 10, 2025 23:04
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 enabled auto-merge April 10, 2025 23:05
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit 6d30007 Apr 10, 2025
56 checks passed
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 deleted the grpc-server-find-trace-ids branch April 10, 2025 23:27
AnmolxSingh pushed a commit to AnmolxSingh/jaeger that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6979

## Description of the changes
- Implement the `FindTraceIDs` call in the gRPC v2 handler

## How was this change tested?
- Added unit tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6979

## Description of the changes
- Implement the `FindTraceIDs` call in the gRPC v2 handler

## How was this change tested?
- Added unit tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
)

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6979

## Description of the changes
- Implement the `FindTraceIDs` call in the gRPC v2 handler

## How was this change tested?
- Added unit tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/storage changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants