Skip to content

[grpc][v2] Implement FindTraces Call in gRPC reader for remote storage api v2 #6962

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

mahadzaryab1
Copy link
Collaborator

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • This PR implements the FindTraces call in the gRPC v2 API client

How was this change tested?

  • Added unit tests

Checklist

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

yurishkuro commented Apr 2, 2025

I think experimental tag for these PRs would be more appropriate. It's not like they provide some user-facing capability, until v2 grpc storage is officially added.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.21%. Comparing base (9224477) to head (2b23ffb).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6962      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.20%   96.21%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         343      343              
  Lines       20266    20281      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        19496    19513      +17     
+ Misses        581      579       -2     
  Partials      189      189              
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 10.53% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1-manual 15.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-auto 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2-manual 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1-manual 15.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-auto 2.17% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2-manual 2.17% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 20.76% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 20.84% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 21.02% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v1 11.61% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 8.47% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v1 10.82% <ø> (ø)
kafka-3.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 20.89% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 20.89% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 2.18% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor 0.59% <ø> (ø)
unittests 95.00% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code and removed changelog:bugfix-or-minor-feature labels Apr 2, 2025
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 enabled auto-merge April 2, 2025 17:53
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into jaegertracing:main with commit ff8cc96 Apr 2, 2025
58 checks passed
pipiland2612 pushed a commit to pipiland2612/jaeger that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
…age api v2 (jaegertracing#6962)

<!--
!! Please DELETE this comment before posting.
We appreciate your contribution to the Jaeger project! 👋🎉
-->

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6789

## Description of the changes
- This PR implements the `FindTraces` call in the gRPC v2 API client

## How was this change tested?
- Added unit tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 deleted the grpc-find-traces branch April 2, 2025 18:29
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…age api v2 (jaegertracing#6962)

<!--
!! Please DELETE this comment before posting.
We appreciate your contribution to the Jaeger project! 👋🎉
-->

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6789

## Description of the changes
- This PR implements the `FindTraces` call in the gRPC v2 API client

## How was this change tested?
- Added unit tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
amilbcahat pushed a commit to amilbcahat/jaeger that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…age api v2 (jaegertracing#6962)

<!--
!! Please DELETE this comment before posting.
We appreciate your contribution to the Jaeger project! 👋🎉
-->

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Towards jaegertracing#6789

## Description of the changes
- This PR implements the `FindTraces` call in the gRPC v2 API client

## How was this change tested?
- Added unit tests

## Checklist
- [x] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [x] I have signed all commits
- [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

---------

Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: amol-verma-allen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/storage changelog:exprimental Change to an experimental part of the code v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants