Support FP32 -> BF16 conversion in epilogue of GroupedGEMM #505
Conversation
|
|
||
| - name: Upload Sarif Artifact | ||
| uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02 # v4.6.2 | ||
| with: | ||
| name: codeql-results-${{ matrix.language }} | ||
| path: ./results/${{ matrix.language }}.sarif | ||
| retention-days: 7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't modify this file. Maybe it was modified by some GitHub Action
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no it wasn't. You might have made a mistake rebasing your branch locally. Please revert this change.
sanchitintel
changed the title
| using EpilogueOp = | ||
| cutlass::epilogue::fusion::LinearCombination<float_t, float_t>; | ||
|
|
||
| using CollectiveEpilogue = | ||
| typename cutlass::epilogue::collective::CollectiveBuilder< | ||
| cutlass::arch::IntelXe, cutlass::arch::OpClassTensorOp, TileShape, | ||
| Shape<_1, _1, _1>, cutlass::epilogue::collective::EpilogueTileAuto, | ||
| float, float, float, LayoutC, 1, ElementOutput, LayoutC, 1, | ||
| EpilogueDispatchPolicy, EpilogueOp>::CollectiveOp; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apart from ElementOutput being bfloat16_t, this is the only difference between the vanilla example, and this one.
@rolandschulz, #482 currently doesn't support this case (BF16 output with BF16 inputs & FP32 accum).
I explained this change here.
Also, please advise if I should combine the two examples (different output dtype) in one file.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I think we want to combine them into one example if they are almost identical.
2 participants
Fixes #500
This new config is being supported:
Amatrices areBF16,Bmatrices areBF16,Cmatrices areFP32, andDmatrices areBF16. The conversion of output from FP32 to BF16 happens in the epilogue.Just one line change in
include/cutlass/epilogue/collective/builders/xe_builder.inlto enable dtype conversion in epilogue for GroupedGEMM in the cutlass headers, but the GroupedGEMM example fromexamples/04_bmg_grouped_gemm/04_bmg_grouped_gemm_bf16_output.cpphas been copy-pasted all over again (please use a diff tool such as BeyondCompare to see the difference in both files) to create a new file with a few lines of code changes that I mostly adapted/copy-pasted from https://github.com/intel/cutlass-sycl/blob/e83f147263dd8ca3589b34d76ce6fbec58bac048/test/unit/gemm/device/default_gemm_group_configuration.hpp.Ideally, we should retain one example & test different output dtypes in it. I'm open to making such a change.
Thanks!