-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
fix: leaked federation subgraph types on supergraph #230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @n1ru4l, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a crucial fix for the supergraph composition process, specifically addressing how the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a regression test to ensure that FieldSet defined in a subgraph does not leak into the supergraph. This is a valuable addition to prevent future regressions. The implementation of the test is solid, but I've noticed a minor typo in the test description that I've suggested a fix for.
This PR was opened by the [Changesets release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated. # Releases ## @theguild/[email protected] ### Patch Changes - [#230](#230) [`2b34f17`](2b34f17) Thanks [@n1ru4l](https://github.com/n1ru4l)! - Prevent subgraph-specific federation types and scalars being re-declared within the subgraph leaking into the supergraph. Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Prevent subgraph-specific federation types and scalars being re-declared within the subgraph leaking into the supergraph.
https://linear.app/the-guild/issue/CONSOLE-1643