Skip to content

Conversation

toaction
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @toaction, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant improvement to how function signatures are represented and retrieved within the system. By moving from a simple string representation to a more structured Signature object that includes the source of the signature, the change enhances the accuracy and traceability of function metadata. This refactoring ensures that the system can differentiate between signatures obtained from various methods (like Python's inspect module, docstrings, or default paradigms), leading to more robust and informative code generation or analysis.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Signature Representation: The system now stores not only the string representation of a function's signature but also its origin (e.g., from Python's inspect module, docstrings, or a default paradigm).
  • New Data Structures: Introduced a Signature struct and a SigSource enum in symbol/symbol.go to precisely capture signature details and their source.
  • Improved Signature Retrieval: The getSignature function has been refactored to return the new Signature struct along with an error, and includes logic to populate the Source field based on the signature's origin.
  • Type Safety and Clarity: Updated the Symbol struct and related code to use the new Signature type, improving type safety and clarity in handling function signatures throughout the codebase.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a Signature struct to store not just the signature string but also its source (e.g., from inspect or doc). This is a great enhancement for traceability and debugging. The changes in pydump and pygen are consistent with this new structure. I have a couple of suggestions to improve robustness and the readability of the generated JSON output.

Copy link
Contributor

niupilot bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Code Review Summary

Overall Assessment: Good quality implementation with a well-structured approach to signature source tracking. The change from string signatures to structured objects improves type safety and maintainability.

Key Issues to Address:

  • Critical: Missing Go documentation for new public types (SigSource, Signature)
  • High: Update design documentation to reflect API changes
  • Medium: Add function documentation for signature extraction logic

Performance Impact: Minimal (+8 bytes per Symbol) with good benefits for debugging and future optimization.

Security: No significant vulnerabilities found. Clean implementation with proper error handling.

The structured signature approach is a solid improvement that will make future enhancements easier.

Co-authored-by: niupilot[bot] <230321281+niupilot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Micro Liu <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.46%. Comparing base (f84dd79) to head (aa4e2be).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
tool/pygen/genfunc.go 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #41   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.46%   44.46%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         452      452           
=======================================
  Hits          201      201           
  Misses        232      232           
  Partials       19       19           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant