-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8k
fix(core): Allow model to be set from settings.json
#5527
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @richieforeman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the configuration system by allowing the AI model to be specified in settings.json. It establishes a clear precedence: command-line arguments (--model) override settings.json settings, and if neither is present, a default model (gemini-2.5-pro) is used. This change provides greater flexibility for users to manage their preferred AI model.
Highlights
- Flexible Model Configuration: I've enabled the model setting to be read from settings.json, giving users another way to configure their preferred AI model.
- Model Precedence Logic: I've implemented a clear hierarchy for model selection: command-line arguments (--model) take priority, followed by the settings.json entry, and finally, a default model (gemini-2.5-pro) is used if no other model is specified.
- Comprehensive Test Coverage: I've added new unit tests to config.test.ts to thoroughly validate the model selection logic, ensuring that settings.json settings, command-line arguments, and the default fallback all behave as expected.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly implements the ability to set the model from settings.json, with a clear precedence order of CLI arguments, then settings, then a default. The new logic is well-tested. However, a debugger statement was left in the code, which is a critical issue that must be addressed before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ export interface Settings { | |||
| bugCommand?: BugCommandSettings; | |||
| checkpointing?: CheckpointingSettings; | |||
| autoConfigureMaxOldSpaceSize?: boolean; | |||
| /** The model name to use (e.g 'gemini-9.0-pro') */ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wow didn't realize 9.0 pro was out :)
|

TLDR
This allows
modelsetting to be applied fromsettings.json, defaulting only to the DEFAULT_MODEL (Gemini 2.5 Pro) iff there is nothing in argv && merged settings.Dive Deeper
I felt it made sense to have the
--modelflag always take priority over other values, since that's always invoked by the user on demand rather than a passive config file.Reviewer Test Plan
settings.json&&--modelare empty, then the default model should kick in--modelalways wins oversettings.jsonTesting Matrix
Linked issues / bugs