JJB job for running the functional test from glusterfs-coreutils #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 3 commits
May 11, 2018 12:58
…entosci into gluster_coreutils
nigelbabu
suggested changes
May 15, 2018
Contributor
nigelbabu
left a comment
nigelbabu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When we switch this over to JJB, it should also get rid of the curl to the repo to get the test script. Ideally, we should be doing a clone to get the test script. See how the rpm build works.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Runs the functional test from glusterfs-coreutils against glusterfs latest package