Skip to content

Conversation

belimawr
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

It improves the integration tests framework docs

Why is it important?

See above

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the pull request guidelines of this project.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool
  • I have added an integration test or an E2E test

## Disruptive User Impact
## How to test this PR locally
## Related issues

Questions to ask yourself

  • How are we going to support this in production?
  • How are we going to measure its adoption?
  • How are we going to debug this?
  • What are the metrics I should take care of?
  • ...

@belimawr belimawr self-assigned this Sep 25, 2025
@belimawr belimawr added Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team docs labels Sep 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 25, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @belimawr? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-./d./d is the label that automatically backports to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
  • backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
  • backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
  • backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

Copy link
Contributor

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@belimawr belimawr marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 17:15
@belimawr belimawr requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2025 17:15
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent-control-plane (Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane)

Copy link
Member

@ebeahan ebeahan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@belimawr belimawr merged commit f84eec3 into elastic:main Sep 25, 2025
16 of 19 checks passed
@belimawr belimawr deleted the fix-k8s-integ-test-docs branch September 25, 2025 20:15
v1v added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
* upstream: (505 commits)
  Update journald tests now that Filebeat supports watching folders (#10131)
  [deploy/kubernetes]: add info about hostPID for Universal Profiling (#10173)
  Fall back to process runtime if otel runtime is unsupported (#10087)
  Conditionall check for ms_tls13kdf build tag (#10160)
  [docs][edot] add entry for profiles (#10163)
  edot/docs: add support for profiles (#10146)
  Add Logstash exporter (#10137)
  Add back publish to serverless. (#10159)
  Improve Integration test documentation (#10155)
  Fix multiarch service image push from main to serverless (#10129)
  Forward migrate action to endpoint (#9801)
  Comment out check for ms_tls13kdf tag for FIPS-capable binaries (#10148)
  [otel] add receivers: apache, iis, mysql, postgresql, sqlserver v0.135.0 (#9344)
  Add k8sevents receiver in kube-stack (#10086)
  feat: emit system resource metrics for EDOT subprocess (#10003)
  [AutoOps] Configure OTel Exporter to Send Maximum-sized Batches (#10126)
  keep enrollment token when replacing data with signed (#10115)
  Revert "Publish `elastic-agent-service` container directly to serverless from main (#9583)" (#10127)
  Add agent_policy_id and policy_revision_idx to checkin requests (#9931)
  remove resource/k8s processor and use k8sattributes processor for service attributes (#10108)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants