Skip to content

Conversation

@Abirdcfly
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Abirdcfly [email protected]

Checklist

@vixentael vixentael requested a review from Lagovas August 10, 2022 10:07
os.Exit(1)
log.WithField(logging.FieldKeyEventCode, logging.EventCodePoisonRecordDetectionMessage).Errorln("executed code after os.Exit")
return nil
panic("executed code after os.Exit")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait, is that even possible?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a little trick I learned from the golang source code that if we want to specify that we don't need to return here, but the compiler will report an error if we don't write return, we can use panic instead.

https://github.com/golang/go/blob/43456202a1e55da55666fac9d56ace7654a65b64/src/crypto/tls/handshake_test.go#L305-L306

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is good approach, but we prefer to log it, skip bad case and continue handling further requests. It is a questionable case, do we need to log and rely on existing alerts that catch unexpected log messages and react on that or leave here panic and rely on tests (which will detect issues with os package or source code updates) and infrastructure that will restart service on failure and have enough extra instances to catch requests during restart...
After revising this case, I think will be better to leave here panic and catch it in our tests.
@Zhaars , @G1gg1L3s, what do you think?

@Lagovas Lagovas merged commit 9def31d into cossacklabs:master Aug 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants