Adds test.for, it.for, and describe.for bindings

[illusionalsagacity]

These have the test context passed as an argument, and preserves the
array's tuple to be passed in as the first argument. This removes the
need for the -N suffix bindings and allows use of the non-BuiltIn
bindings

[illusionalsagacity]

@cometkim Would you have some time soon to review this? Unfortunately test.each does not provide the test context so you have to open Vitest.Bindings.BuiltIn today if you use those style of tests.

[cometkim]

Looks great.

I don't think we need to keep both each and for, so maybe I will remove the Each module in the next major.

[cometkim]

Can you add describe sets too?

[illusionalsagacity]

Sure!

It looks like it was introduced in vitest v3: vitest-dev/vitest#7253, should I add it with a warning that it's not compatible with v2?

[cometkim]

Maybe I should bump vitest version in the next release.

It doesn't have breaking changes that could affect rescript-vitest users? Let me check peerDeps and histories first.

[cometkim]

https://vitest.dev/guide/migration#vitest-3

There are some breaking changes, but mostly I can handle

[illusionalsagacity]

Ah, when you go to bump it for devDependencies I forgot to push these tests:

For.describe(sumObj, "sum $a+$b=$sum", (i, t) => {
  expect(t, i["a"] + i["b"])->Expect.toBe(i["sum"])
  expect(t, i["a"] + i["b"] + 1)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(i["sum"])
})

For.describe(sum2, "%i=%s", ((a, b), t) => {
  expect(t, a->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(b)
  expect(t, (a + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(b)
})

For.describe(sum3, "sum %i+%i=%s", ((a, b, sum), t) => {
  expect(t, (a + b)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(sum)
  expect(t, (a + b + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(sum)
})

For.describe(sum4, "sum %i+%i+%i=%s", ((a, b, c, sum), t) => {
  expect(t, (a + b + c)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(sum)
  expect(t, (a + b + c + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(sum)
})

For.describe(sum5, "sum %i+%i+%i+%i=%s", ((a, b, c, d, sum), t) => {
  expect(t, (a + b + c + d)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(sum)
  expect(t, (a + b + c + d + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(sum)
})

For.describeAsync(sumObj, "sum $a+$b=$sum", async (i, t) => {
  expect(t, i["a"] + i["b"])->Expect.toBe(i["sum"])
  expect(t, i["a"] + i["b"] + 1)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(i["sum"])
})

For.describeAsync(sum2, "%i=%s", async ((a, b), t) => {
  expect(t, a->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(b)
  expect(t, (a + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(b)
})

For.describeAsync(sum3, "sum %i+%i=%s", async ((a, b, sum), t) => {
  expect(t, (a + b)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(sum)
  expect(t, (a + b + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(sum)
})

For.describeAsync(sum4, "sum %i+%i+%i=%s", async ((a, b, c, sum), t) => {
  expect(t, (a + b + c)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(sum)
  expect(t, (a + b + c + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(sum)
})

For.describeAsync(sum5, "sum %i+%i+%i+%i=%s", async ((a, b, c, d, sum), t) => {
  expect(t, (a + b + c + d)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.toBe(sum)
  expect(t, (a + b + c + d + 1)->Js.Int.toString)->Expect.not->Expect.toBe(sum)
})

[cometkim]

btw, descritbe has no test context