feat(webhook): allow direct vault reference in secret PluginOptionValues #1354
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
abhijith-darshan
changed the title
IvoGoman
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2025
IvoGoman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2025
cloud-operator-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2025
(cherry picked from commit 77c6f17)
Contributor
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
IvoGoman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2025
…1408) (cherry picked from commit 77c6f17) Co-authored-by: Uwe Mayer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Currently we disallow any direct
Valuein OptionValues of typesecret. We only allow SecretReferences.With the introduction of #1211 we will want to allow direct references to secrets stored in vault.
This changes the Admission to allow string values prefixed with
which is the agreed upon schema to refer to vault entries.
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related Tickets & Documents
#1211
Added tests?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Added to documentation?
Checklist