Skip to content

tests: Add manual tests procedure. #120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 11, 2019
Merged

tests: Add manual tests procedure. #120

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 11, 2019

Conversation

microbit-carlos
Copy link
Collaborator

This is still a work in progress.

@microbit-carlos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@microbit-mark I haven't finished writing these test cases, but could you start reviewing the content of what's currently in the PR?
No need to execute the tests yet.

- A micro:bit with WebUSB-enabled DAPLink and access to a version of the
Python Editor with WebUSB REPL

- If running the tests on Windows 7 you might need the Mbed serial driver
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can assume the meat-and-bones test runner should have enough technical background to figure this out. I'd prefer not to add info that can get out-of-date and nobody will check in the future.

- A serial terminal program you are comfortable to connect to a micro:bit
- The working microREPL installation (https://github.com/ntoll/microrepl)
- Mu editor (https://codewith.mu/)
- A micro:bit with WebUSB-enabled DAPLink and access to a version of the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we link to firmware update page here https://microbit.org/guide/firmware/ and say this is 0247+

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As with the previous one, I'd prefer to assume the person running the tests can figure this out themselves. This part is not essential either, as you only need one option from the list.

@microbit-mark
Copy link
Contributor

I have checked over the language and added comments. Looks good at this stage.

@microbit-carlos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks Mark! I've added a commit with the review comment changes.
I'll let you know when the procedure is ready for its final review and test run.

@microbit-carlos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@microbit-mark I think I've finished the current version of the Test Procedure, you can see the changes and additions in commit e623207.
No need to run the test yet, as we need to run these to the version of the editor ready to be deployed as the primary editor. I'll give a head's up when that happens.

Could you check the latest changes and if you are happy with the content we can merge this to master.

@microbit-carlos microbit-carlos marked this pull request as ready for review March 8, 2019 16:21
@microbit-mark
Copy link
Contributor

The changes look good to merge

@microbit-carlos
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks Mark!

@microbit-carlos microbit-carlos merged commit 7bbae7d into master Mar 11, 2019
@microbit-carlos microbit-carlos deleted the manual_tests branch March 11, 2019 10:21
microbit-rosslowe added a commit to microbit-rosslowe/PythonEditor that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2019
tests: Add manual tests procedure. (bbcmicrobit#120)
microbit-mark added a commit to microbit-mark/PythonEditor that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants