Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2020. It is now read-only.

Introduce ns_error_domain attribute. #4

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Introduce ns_error_domain attribute. #4

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

milseman
Copy link
Contributor

@milseman milseman commented Feb 2, 2016

ns_error_domain can be used by, e.g. NS_ERROR_ENUM, in order to
identify a global declaration representing the domain constant.

Introduces the attribute, Sema handling, diagnostics, and test case.

@milseman
Introduce ns_error_domain attribute.
f6f7f4e 
ns_error_domain can be used by, e.g. NS_ERROR_ENUM, in order to
identify a global declaration representing the domain constant.

Introduces the attribute, Sema handling, diagnostics, and test case.
@milseman milseman closed this Feb 2, 2016
@milseman
Copy link
Contributor Author

milseman commented Feb 2, 2016

The github interface lied to me and said it was going to upstream

fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2016
@dlj-NaN
Simplify Clang's version number configuration in CMake.
133fae6 
Currently, the Clang version is computed as follows:

 1. LLVM defines major, minor, and patch versions, all statically set. Today,
    these are 4, 0, and 0, respectively.
 2. The static version numbers are combined into PACKAGE_VERSION along with a
    suffix, so the result today looks like "4.0.0svn".
 3. Clang extracts CLANG_VERSION from PACKAGE_VERSION using a regexp. The regexp
    allows the patch level to omitted, and drops any non-digit trailing values.
    Today, this result looks like "4.0.0".
 4. CLANG_VERSION is then split further into CLANG_VERSION_MAJOR and
    CLANG_VERSION_MINOR. Today, these resolve to 4 and 0, respectively.
 5. If CLANG_VERSION matches a regexp with three version components, then
    CLANG_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL is extracted and the CLANG_HAS_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL
    variable is set to 1. Today, these values are 0 and 1, respectively.
 6. The CLANG_VERSION_* variables (and CLANG_HAS_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL) are
    configured into [llvm/tools/clang/]include/clang/Basic/Version.inc
    verbatim by CMake.
 7. In [llvm/tools/clang/]include/clang/Basic/Version.h, macros are defined
    conditionally, based on CLANG_HAS_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL, to compute
    CLANG_VERSION_STRING as either a two- or three-level version number. Today,
    this value is "4.0.0", because despite the patchlevel being 0, it was
    matched by regexp and is thus "HAS"ed by the preprocessor. This string is
    then used wherever Clang's "version" is needed [*].

[*] Including, notably, by compiler-rt, for computing its installation path.

This change collapses steps 2-5 by defaulting Clang to use LLVM's (non-string)
version components for the Clang version (see [*] for why not PACKAGE_VERSION),
and collapses steps 6 and 7 by simply writing CLANG_VERSION_STRING into
Version.inc. The Clang version today always uses the patchlevel form, so the
collapsed Version.inc does not have logic for a version without a patch level.

Historically speaking, this technique began with the VER file in r82085 (which
survives in the form of the regexp in #3). The major, minor, and patchlevel
versions were introduced by r106863 (which remains in #4-6). The VER file itself
was deleted in favor of the LLVM version number in r106914. On the LLVM side,
the individual LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR, LLVM_VERSION_MINOR, and PACKAGE_VERSION
weren't introduced for nearly two more years, until r150405.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@281666 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2017
@alexfh
Fix an assertion failure in FormatASTNodeDiagnosticArgument.
b38543d 
Summary:
The test being added in this patch used to cause an assertion failure:

/build/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /build/lib/clang/5.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -verify -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -Wshadow-all /src/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-shadow.cpp
--
Exit Code: 134

Command Output (stderr):
--
clang: /src/tools/clang/lib/AST/ASTDiagnostic.cpp:424: void clang::FormatASTNodeDiagnosticArgument(DiagnosticsEngine::ArgumentKind, intptr_t, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, ArrayRef<DiagnosticsEngine::ArgumentValue>, SmallVectorImpl<char> &, void *, ArrayRef<intptr_t>): Assertion `isa<NamedDecl>(DC) && "Expected a NamedDecl"' failed.
#0 0x0000000001c7a1b4 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/build/./bin/clang+0x1c7a1b4)
#1 0x0000000001c7a4e6 SignalHandler(int) (/build/./bin/clang+0x1c7a4e6)
#2 0x00007f30880078d0 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0xf8d0)
#3 0x00007f3087054067 gsignal (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x35067)
#4 0x00007f3087055448 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x36448)
#5 0x00007f308704d266 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2e266)
#6 0x00007f308704d312 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2e312)
#7 0x00000000035b7f22 clang::FormatASTNodeDiagnosticArgument(clang::DiagnosticsEngine::ArgumentKind, long, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<std::pair<clang::DiagnosticsEngine::ArgumentKind, long> >, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>&, void*, llvm::ArrayRef<long>) (/build/
./bin/clang+0x35b7f22)
#8 0x0000000001ddbae4 clang::Diagnostic::FormatDiagnostic(char const*, char const*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>&) const (/build/./bin/clang+0x1ddbae4)
#9 0x0000000001ddb323 clang::Diagnostic::FormatDiagnostic(char const*, char const*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>&) const (/build/./bin/clang+0x1ddb323)
#10 0x00000000022878a4 clang::TextDiagnosticBuffer::HandleDiagnostic(clang::DiagnosticsEngine::Level, clang::Diagnostic const&) (/build/./bin/clang+0x22878a4)
#11 0x0000000001ddf387 clang::DiagnosticIDs::ProcessDiag(clang::DiagnosticsEngine&) const (/build/./bin/clang+0x1ddf387)
#12 0x0000000001dd9dea clang::DiagnosticsEngine::EmitCurrentDiagnostic(bool) (/build/./bin/clang+0x1dd9dea)
#13 0x0000000002cad00c clang::Sema::EmitCurrentDiagnostic(unsigned int) (/build/./bin/clang+0x2cad00c)
#14 0x0000000002d91cd2 clang::Sema::CheckShadow(clang::NamedDecl*, clang::NamedDecl*, clang::LookupResult const&) (/build/./bin/clang+0x2d91cd2)

Stack dump:
0.      Program arguments: /build/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /build/lib/clang/5.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -verify -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -Wshadow-all /src/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-shadow.cpp
1.      /src/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-shadow.cpp:214:23: current parser token ';'
2.      /src/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-shadow.cpp:213:26: parsing function body 'handleLinkageSpec'
3.      /src/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-shadow.cpp:213:26: in compound statement ('{}')
/build/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/Output/warn-shadow.cpp.script: line 1: 15595 Aborted                 (core dumped) /build/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /build/lib/clang/5.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -verify -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -Wshadow-all /src/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-shadow.cpp

Reviewers: rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: krytarowski, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33207

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@303325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2017
@zmodem
Revert r310074 (see PR34067 #4)
9d12f17 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_50@310726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2019
@hctim
Rollback of rL355585.
fbb9516 
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
    #2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
    #3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    #4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
    #2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
    #3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
    #4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    #5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
    #1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
    #2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
    #3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
    #4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
    #5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
    #6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)

SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@355616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
@alexfh
Remove a useless assertion in clang-check.
18ac76c 
The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation
databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion
failure.

An example of the assertion:
input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
typedef int T
             ^
             ;
input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes
clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed.
  #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13
  #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
  #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1
  #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0)
  #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf)
  #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa)
  #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37)
  #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2)
  #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag)
  #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type)
 #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*)
 #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
 #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0
 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
 #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
 #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
 #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
 #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0
 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const
 #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const
 #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const
 #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0
 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0
 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++()
 #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0
 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33
 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18
 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10
 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11
 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@357915 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
@RKSimon
Revert rL357915 from cfe/trunk: Remove a useless assertion in clang-c…
14e3e53 
…heck.

The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation
databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion
failure.

An example of the assertion:
input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
typedef int T
             ^
             ;
input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes
clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed.
  #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13
  #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
  #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1
  #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0)
  #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf)
  #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa)
  #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37)
  #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2)
  #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag)
  #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type)
 #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*)
 #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
 #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0
 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
 #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
 #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
 #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
 #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0
 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const
 #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const
 #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const
 #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0
 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0
 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++()
 #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0
 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33
 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18
 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10
 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11
 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15
........
Breaks windows buildbots

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@357918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
@alexfh
Remove a useless assertion in clang-check.
f72b058 
Re-commit r357915 with a fix for windows.

The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation
databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion
failure.

An example of the assertion:
input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
typedef int T
             ^
             ;
input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes
clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed.
  #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13
  #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
  #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1
  #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0)
  #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf)
  #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa)
  #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37)
  #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2)
  #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag)
  #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type)
 #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*)
 #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
 #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0
 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
 #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
 #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
 #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
 #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0
 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const
 #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const
 #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const
 #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0
 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0
 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++()
 #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0
 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33
 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18
 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10
 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11
 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@357921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2019
@yonghong-song
[BPF] Preserve debuginfo array/union/struct type/access index
4712185 
For background of BPF CO-RE project, please refer to
  http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2019.html
In summary, BPF CO-RE intends to compile bpf programs
adjustable on struct/union layout change so the same
program can run on multiple kernels with adjustment
before loading based on native kernel structures.

In order to do this, we need keep track of GEP(getelementptr)
instruction base and result debuginfo types, so we
can adjust on the host based on kernel BTF info.
Capturing such information as an IR optimization is hard
as various optimization may have tweaked GEP and also
union is replaced by structure it is impossible to track
fieldindex for union member accesses.

Three intrinsic functions, preserve_{array,union,struct}_access_index,
are introducted.
  addr = preserve_array_access_index(base, index, dimension)
  addr = preserve_union_access_index(base, di_index)
  addr = preserve_struct_access_index(base, gep_index, di_index)
here,
  base: the base pointer for the array/union/struct access.
  index: the last access index for array, the same for IR/DebugInfo layout.
  dimension: the array dimension.
  gep_index: the access index based on IR layout.
  di_index: the access index based on user/debuginfo types.

If using these intrinsics blindly, i.e., transforming all GEPs
to these intrinsics and later on reducing them to GEPs, we have
seen up to 7% more instructions generated. To avoid such an overhead,
a clang builtin is proposed:
  base = __builtin_preserve_access_index(base)
such that user wraps to-be-relocated GEPs in this builtin
and preserve_*_access_index intrinsics only apply to
those GEPs. Such a buyin will prevent performance degradation
if people do not use CO-RE, even for programs which use
bpf_probe_read().

For example, for the following example,
  $ cat test.c
  struct sk_buff {
     int i;
     int b1:1;
     int b2:2;
     union {
       struct {
         int o1;
         int o2;
       } o;
       struct {
         char flags;
         char dev_id;
       } dev;
       int netid;
     } u[10];
  };

  static int (*bpf_probe_read)(void *dst, int size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
      = (void *) 4;

  #define _(x) (__builtin_preserve_access_index(x))

  int bpf_prog(struct sk_buff *ctx) {
    char dev_id;
    bpf_probe_read(&dev_id, sizeof(char), _(&ctx->u[5].dev.dev_id));
    return dev_id;
  }
  $ clang -target bpf -O2 -g -emit-llvm -S -mllvm -print-before-all \
    test.c >& log

The generated IR looks like below:
  ...
  define dso_local i32 @bpf_prog(%struct.sk_buff*) #0 !dbg !15 {
    %2 = alloca %struct.sk_buff*, align 8
    %3 = alloca i8, align 1
    store %struct.sk_buff* %0, %struct.sk_buff** %2, align 8, !tbaa !45
    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.sk_buff** %2, metadata !43, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !49
    call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %3) #4, !dbg !50
    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i8* %3, metadata !44, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !51
    %4 = load i32 (i8*, i32, i8*)*, i32 (i8*, i32, i8*)** @bpf_probe_read, align 8, !dbg !52, !tbaa !45
    %5 = load %struct.sk_buff*, %struct.sk_buff** %2, align 8, !dbg !53, !tbaa !45
    %6 = call [10 x %union.anon]* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0a10s_union.anons.p0s_struct.sk_buffs(
         %struct.sk_buff* %5, i32 2, i32 3), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !19
    %7 = call %union.anon* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0s_union.anons.p0a10s_union.anons(
         [10 x %union.anon]* %6, i32 1, i32 5), !dbg !53
    %8 = call %union.anon* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.anons.p0s_union.anons(
         %union.anon* %7, i32 1), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !26
    %9 = bitcast %union.anon* %8 to %struct.anon.0*, !dbg !53
    %10 = call i8* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i8.p0s_struct.anon.0s(
         %struct.anon.0* %9, i32 1, i32 1), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !34
    %11 = call i32 %4(i8* %3, i32 1, i8* %10), !dbg !52
    %12 = load i8, i8* %3, align 1, !dbg !54, !tbaa !55
    %13 = sext i8 %12 to i32, !dbg !54
    call void @llvm.lifetime.end.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %3) #4, !dbg !56
    ret i32 %13, !dbg !57
  }

  !19 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "sk_buff", file: !3, line: 1, size: 704, elements: !20)
  !26 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, scope: !19, file: !3, line: 5, size: 64, elements: !27)
  !34 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, scope: !26, file: !3, line: 10, size: 16, elements: !35)

Note that @llvm.preserve.{struct,union}.access.index calls have metadata llvm.preserve.access.index
attached to instructions to provide struct/union debuginfo type information.

For &ctx->u[5].dev.dev_id,
  . The "%6 = ..." represents struct member "u" with index 2 for IR layout and index 3 for DI layout.
  . The "%7 = ..." represents array subscript "5".
  . The "%8 = ..." represents union member "dev" with index 1 for DI layout.
  . The "%10 = ..." represents struct member "dev_id" with index 1 for both IR and DI layout.

Basically, traversing the use-def chain recursively for the 3rd argument of bpf_probe_read() and
examining all preserve_*_access_index calls, the debuginfo struct/union/array access index
can be achieved.

The intrinsics also contain enough information to regenerate codes for IR layout.
For array and structure intrinsics, the proper GEP can be constructed.
For union intrinsics, replacing all uses of "addr" with "base" should be enough.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@365435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2019
@yonghong-song
[BPF] Preserve debuginfo array/union/struct type/access index
1aedf16 
For background of BPF CO-RE project, please refer to
  http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2019.html
In summary, BPF CO-RE intends to compile bpf programs
adjustable on struct/union layout change so the same
program can run on multiple kernels with adjustment
before loading based on native kernel structures.

In order to do this, we need keep track of GEP(getelementptr)
instruction base and result debuginfo types, so we
can adjust on the host based on kernel BTF info.
Capturing such information as an IR optimization is hard
as various optimization may have tweaked GEP and also
union is replaced by structure it is impossible to track
fieldindex for union member accesses.

Three intrinsic functions, preserve_{array,union,struct}_access_index,
are introducted.
  addr = preserve_array_access_index(base, index, dimension)
  addr = preserve_union_access_index(base, di_index)
  addr = preserve_struct_access_index(base, gep_index, di_index)
here,
  base: the base pointer for the array/union/struct access.
  index: the last access index for array, the same for IR/DebugInfo layout.
  dimension: the array dimension.
  gep_index: the access index based on IR layout.
  di_index: the access index based on user/debuginfo types.

If using these intrinsics blindly, i.e., transforming all GEPs
to these intrinsics and later on reducing them to GEPs, we have
seen up to 7% more instructions generated. To avoid such an overhead,
a clang builtin is proposed:
  base = __builtin_preserve_access_index(base)
such that user wraps to-be-relocated GEPs in this builtin
and preserve_*_access_index intrinsics only apply to
those GEPs. Such a buyin will prevent performance degradation
if people do not use CO-RE, even for programs which use
bpf_probe_read().

For example, for the following example,
  $ cat test.c
  struct sk_buff {
     int i;
     int b1:1;
     int b2:2;
     union {
       struct {
         int o1;
         int o2;
       } o;
       struct {
         char flags;
         char dev_id;
       } dev;
       int netid;
     } u[10];
  };

  static int (*bpf_probe_read)(void *dst, int size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
      = (void *) 4;

  #define _(x) (__builtin_preserve_access_index(x))

  int bpf_prog(struct sk_buff *ctx) {
    char dev_id;
    bpf_probe_read(&dev_id, sizeof(char), _(&ctx->u[5].dev.dev_id));
    return dev_id;
  }
  $ clang -target bpf -O2 -g -emit-llvm -S -mllvm -print-before-all \
    test.c >& log

The generated IR looks like below:
  ...
  define dso_local i32 @bpf_prog(%struct.sk_buff*) #0 !dbg !15 {
    %2 = alloca %struct.sk_buff*, align 8
    %3 = alloca i8, align 1
    store %struct.sk_buff* %0, %struct.sk_buff** %2, align 8, !tbaa !45
    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.sk_buff** %2, metadata !43, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !49
    call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %3) #4, !dbg !50
    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i8* %3, metadata !44, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !51
    %4 = load i32 (i8*, i32, i8*)*, i32 (i8*, i32, i8*)** @bpf_probe_read, align 8, !dbg !52, !tbaa !45
    %5 = load %struct.sk_buff*, %struct.sk_buff** %2, align 8, !dbg !53, !tbaa !45
    %6 = call [10 x %union.anon]* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0a10s_union.anons.p0s_struct.sk_buffs(
         %struct.sk_buff* %5, i32 2, i32 3), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !19
    %7 = call %union.anon* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0s_union.anons.p0a10s_union.anons(
         [10 x %union.anon]* %6, i32 1, i32 5), !dbg !53
    %8 = call %union.anon* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.anons.p0s_union.anons(
         %union.anon* %7, i32 1), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !26
    %9 = bitcast %union.anon* %8 to %struct.anon.0*, !dbg !53
    %10 = call i8* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i8.p0s_struct.anon.0s(
         %struct.anon.0* %9, i32 1, i32 1), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !34
    %11 = call i32 %4(i8* %3, i32 1, i8* %10), !dbg !52
    %12 = load i8, i8* %3, align 1, !dbg !54, !tbaa !55
    %13 = sext i8 %12 to i32, !dbg !54
    call void @llvm.lifetime.end.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %3) #4, !dbg !56
    ret i32 %13, !dbg !57
  }

  !19 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "sk_buff", file: !3, line: 1, size: 704, elements: !20)
  !26 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, scope: !19, file: !3, line: 5, size: 64, elements: !27)
  !34 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, scope: !26, file: !3, line: 10, size: 16, elements: !35)

Note that @llvm.preserve.{struct,union}.access.index calls have metadata llvm.preserve.access.index
attached to instructions to provide struct/union debuginfo type information.

For &ctx->u[5].dev.dev_id,
  . The "%6 = ..." represents struct member "u" with index 2 for IR layout and index 3 for DI layout.
  . The "%7 = ..." represents array subscript "5".
  . The "%8 = ..." represents union member "dev" with index 1 for DI layout.
  . The "%10 = ..." represents struct member "dev_id" with index 1 for both IR and DI layout.

Basically, traversing the use-def chain recursively for the 3rd argument of bpf_probe_read() and
examining all preserve_*_access_index calls, the debuginfo struct/union/array access index
can be achieved.

The intrinsics also contain enough information to regenerate codes for IR layout.
For array and structure intrinsics, the proper GEP can be constructed.
For union intrinsics, replacing all uses of "addr" with "base" should be enough.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61809

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@365438 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
fredriss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2019
@LebedevRI
[AST] ASTReader::ReadSLocEntry(): move computation of FirstDecl into …
a814be6 
…the branch where it's used

The existing code is not defined, you are not allowed
to produce non-null pointer from null pointer (F->FileSortedDecls here).
That being said, i'm not really confident this is fix-enough, but we'll see.

FAIL: Clang :: Modules/no-module-map.cpp (6879 of 16079)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: Modules/no-module-map.cpp' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-name=ab -x c++-header /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map/a.h /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map/b.h -emit-header-module -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm
: 'RUN: at line 2';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify
: 'RUN: at line 3';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify -DA
: 'RUN: at line 4';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify -DB
: 'RUN: at line 5';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify -DA -DB
: 'RUN: at line 7';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -E /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm -o - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp
: 'RUN: at line 8';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -frewrite-imports -E /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm -o - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp
--
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stderr):
--
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:1526:50: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 8 to null pointer
    #0 0x3a9bd0c in clang::ASTReader::ReadSLocEntry(int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:1526:50
    #1 0x328b6f8 in clang::SourceManager::loadSLocEntry(unsigned int, bool*) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp:461:28
    #2 0x328b351 in clang::SourceManager::initializeForReplay(clang::SourceManager const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp:399:11
    #3 0x3996c71 in clang::FrontendAction::BeginSourceFile(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::FrontendInputFile const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:581:27
    #4 0x394f341 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:956:13
    #5 0x3a8a92b in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:290:25
    #6 0xaf8d62 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15
    #7 0xaf1602 in ExecuteCC1Tool /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:309:12
    #8 0xaf1602 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:382:12
    #9 0x7f2c1eecc2e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #10 0xad57f9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang-10+0xad57f9)

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:1526:50 in

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@374328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@milseman