Validation warning: Mark union types as experimental

[lars-reimann]

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Union types are still missing features, like resolution of member accesses. For example, a (in p.a) in the following snippet is undefined:

class C {
    attr a: Int
}

segment s (p: union<C>) {
    p.a;
}

Desired solution

Mark union types as experimental.

Possible alternatives (optional)

No response

Screenshots (optional)

No response

Additional Context (optional)

No response

[lars-reimann]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• Visual Studio Marketplace
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀