Skip to content

Conversation

@nth10sd
Copy link
Contributor

@nth10sd nth10sd commented Mar 15, 2017

I rebased #2 by @nbp so please refer to that PR for the context. @nbp, you might want to take a look to see if anything stands out to you.

Copy link
Contributor

@nbp nbp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for merging my previous pull request. I did not got the opportunity to test this pull request, but skimming through the file the changes looks good to me.


'''
This file came from nbp's GitHub PR #2 for adding new Lithium reduction strategies.
https://github.com/MozillaSecurity/lithium/pull/2
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the authorship is interesting for blaming ( :) ), but less interesting for documentation strings.
Maybe move this to a # comment, and add the following ''' comment:

'''
This test is made to minimize a test case by comparing a single binary with different command line arguments.
This can be used to isolate and minimize differential behaviour test cases.
'''

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I added this (and tweaked the comments a little).

@nth10sd nth10sd merged commit 5d2be0e into MozillaSecurity:master May 1, 2017
@nth10sd nth10sd deleted the nbpStrategies branch May 1, 2017 23:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants