Skip to content

Conversation

@havetisyan
Copy link
Collaborator

@havetisyan havetisyan commented Oct 24, 2025

Description

previously we were using the requestDomainName as the dimension for the provider metrics even though the value was the provider service name. Now, the server has the capability to identify the type of the timer metrics e.g. this is provider latency and in that case, we're using providerServiceName as the label name correctly identifying the attribute.

Contribution Checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce any breaking changes
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • Create an issue and link to the pull request.

Attach Screenshots (Optional)

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @havetisyan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly improves the accuracy and specificity of OpenTelemetry metrics by introducing a mechanism to differentiate between various types of timed operations. Previously, provider-related latencies were mislabeled; this change ensures that provider service names are correctly attributed to provider latency metrics. This enhancement provides clearer insights into the performance characteristics of different system components, particularly for provider interactions, leading to more effective monitoring and troubleshooting.

Highlights

  • Metric Type Differentiation: Introduced a TimerMetricType enum (API_LATENCY, PROVIDER_LATENCY, CERTSIGNER_LATENCY) to categorize different types of timed operations within the Metric interface.
  • Provider Metric Labeling: Enhanced the OpenTelemetryMetric implementation to correctly use providerServiceName as a label for PROVIDER_LATENCY metrics, addressing a previous issue where requestDomainName was incorrectly used.
  • New startTiming Overload: Added a new startTiming method to the Metric interface and its OpenTelemetryMetric implementation, allowing callers to specify the TimerMetricType.
  • ZTS Service Integration: Updated the ZTS service's instance registration and refresh flows to leverage the new provider-specific timing metric, ensuring accurate latency tracking for these operations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively extends the OpenTelemetry metrics implementation to support provider-specific metrics for registration and refresh operations. The introduction of TimerMetricType is a good way to differentiate metric types, and the changes in OpenTelemetryMetric correctly handle PROVIDER_LATENCY by using providerServiceName as a label. The test cases have also been updated accordingly. I've identified a couple of high-severity issues where an incorrect status code is reported in metrics during exception handling, which could lead to misleading monitoring data. I've also suggested a minor refactoring to improve code clarity and maintainability.

Signed-off-by: Henry Avetisyan <[email protected]>
@abvaidya abvaidya merged commit febd931 into master Oct 25, 2025
8 checks passed
@abvaidya abvaidya deleted the otel-prov branch October 25, 2025 00:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants