Skip to content

Conversation

@havetisyan
Copy link
Collaborator

@havetisyan havetisyan commented Oct 2, 2025

Description

gcp has a limit of 6 chars min for service name but some teams might already have smaller service name already used in their production workloads. ZTS already provides support for providing such identites but sia agent assumes that a multiple service is in play and uses the service specific identity when fetching the attestation token.

For example, the gcp service account is configured as zts-gcp, but we want an identity on the box for a service called zts. We drop a sia_config file as expected with the value of zts. Now, when sia fetches the attestation data it uses the service account name in the token as zts. However, with this feature if the instance has the "defaultServiceIdentity" attribute with the value of zts, then when processing, the sia agent will use the default identity for the zts service which in case will be the zts-gcp identity.

Contribution Checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce any breaking changes
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • Create an issue and link to the pull request.

Attach Screenshots (Optional)

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @havetisyan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant improvement to how the SIA agent handles identity token attestation on Google Cloud Platform. It provides a mechanism to explicitly define a 'default service identity' through instance metadata. This change addresses scenarios where service names might not align with GCP's naming conventions, ensuring that the SIA agent can correctly retrieve identity tokens without resorting to more complex impersonation flows, thereby increasing flexibility and compatibility for existing workloads.

Highlights

  • Flexible Identity Token Retrieval: The SIA agent's logic for fetching attestation tokens has been enhanced to support using a 'default service identity' specified via instance metadata. This allows services with names that might not conform to GCP's minimum length requirements (e.g., less than 6 characters) to still utilize a pre-configured identity.
  • Metadata-driven Default Identity: A new instance attribute, 'defaultServiceIdentity', can now be configured. If the requested service name matches this attribute's value, the agent will directly fetch the identity token from the metadata server, similar to when the service name matches the instance's primary service account.
  • Expanded Test Coverage: New test cases have been added to validate the new logic, including scenarios for direct metadata token retrieval when using the default service identity, and comprehensive error handling tests for various failure conditions during token fetching.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a mechanism to use the instance's default identity for a service by specifying a defaultServiceIdentity metadata attribute. This is useful when the desired service name doesn't match the GCP service account name. The changes in attestation.go implement this logic, and new tests are added in attestation_test.go to cover the new functionality. My review focuses on improving the robustness of the new logic and correcting issues in the new tests. I've suggested handling a potential edge case with empty service names and improving error visibility in the main logic. For the tests, I've pointed out a logic bug that prevents a test from failing correctly and recommended using test-specific logging for cleaner output. Overall, the changes are good and the tests are comprehensive, but these adjustments will improve the quality and maintainability.

@psasidhar psasidhar merged commit eb40b96 into master Oct 3, 2025
8 checks passed
@psasidhar psasidhar deleted the gcp-svc branch October 3, 2025 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants