-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
Add constraints binding #1679
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add constraints binding #1679
Conversation
|
Clippy will be fixed with #1678 |
hratoanina
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, only minor nits.
SyxtonPrime
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this looks reasonably good (Though I'm not really familiar with this codebase, I joined after we had switched to Plonky3).
Do you think it would be possible to add some comments to the Prover explaining the idea behind the commitment and to the verifier/recursive_verifier showing more clearly where this is checked? (I struggled a little to understand where the verifier was checking the provers commitment)
SyxtonPrime
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just a couple of minor comments
Nashtare
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @LindaGuiga! Looking good! I hust have minor comments on some method arguments otherwise seems good to go
This PR aims at binding the STARK constraints to the challenges used in the quotient polynomials.
@SyxtonPrime Does this look good to you?