Planned changes to the Starknet docs Github repo #964
Replies: 5 comments
-
@ArielElp @LandauRaz @agongdai @lorcan-codes @wojciechos @odednaor @Mirko-von-Leipzig @LucasLvy @jelilat @glrn @dan-ziv @dbejarano820 @AkromDev @ptisserand @Eikix @robertkodra @tdelabro @glihm @yuvalsw @anshulforyou @roi-amaler-starkware @daizhengxue @adishildan @Brivan-26 @omahs @barretodavid @xgrizx @milancermak @thecotne @bbrandtom @nikeshnazareth @emnul @bigant88 @tudorpintea999 @zzq0826 @pandabadger @Swarag-N @AlvaroLuken @tekkac @ivpavici @tshakalekholoane cc: @stoobie You are receiving this because you have contributed to the Starknet documentation. Before making any additional contributions, please see the announcement in this discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@stoobie for the Contributors list, this tool is used on many repos: https://allcontributors.org/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
DONE: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update: DONE Change the name of Please follow these steps to update your local repos to use
Source: danieldogeanu/RenameGitBranch.md |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Previously, this repo used tags as part of the workflow. I removed this step as it had no particular relevance to this repo. As a result, the Changelog is no longer updated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Folks,
This is Steve. I'm a technical writer at StarkWare and I maintain the Starknet docs.
I want to let you know about some minor changes I'm planning to make in the repo, essentially to streamline processes and fix some bugs.
master
instead ofdev
. DONE in chore: remove dev branch from workflows #961. : Using adev
branch is a normal part of a source code repo, but the docs flow does not require this branch, and it adds an unnecessary step in the release and publishing flow. In a case where a PR should not be published immediately, such as a feature that is not yet released, a release branch is created to hold that content until the official release date. For example, docs: Addon_receive
function interface and note about backward compatibility #933.master
the default branch. DONE (Possibly eventually remove thedev
branch, since it is redundant.)I'm not sure about the order of the following changes.
master
tomain
, consistent with the default Github repo naming convention, as well as other doc-related repos in the starknet-io Github org. I think this is the right thing to do and it's something I've been meaning to do for awhile.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions