From 3eb40c40b75116b974ba56881839b2727d4f7bd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Le=C3=B3n=20Orell=20Valerian=20Liehr?= Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 18:58:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo --- src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md b/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md index 5d8727dc5..b05318ce9 100644 --- a/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md +++ b/src/rustdoc-internals/rustdoc-test-suite.md @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Here are some details that are relevant to this test suite specifically: * While you can use both `//@ compile-flags` and `//@ doc-flags` to pass flags to `rustdoc`, prefer to user the latter to show intent. The former is meant for `rustc`. * Add `//@ build-aux-docs` to the test file that has auxiliary crates to not only compile the - auxiliaries with `rustc` but to also document them with `rustdoc` + auxiliaries with `rustc` but to also document them with `rustdoc`. ## Caveats @@ -161,8 +161,9 @@ It's not unusual that the *shape* of the generated HTML document tree changes fr This includes for example renamings of CSS classes. Whenever that happens, *positive* checks will either continue to match the intended element / -attribute / text if their XPath expression is general / loose enough and thus test the correct thing -or they won't in which case they would fail forcing the author of the change tolook at them. +attribute / text (if their XPath expression is general / loose enough) and +thus continue to test the correct thing or they won't in which case they would fail thereby +forcing the author of the change to look at them. Compare that to *negative* checks (e.g., `//@ !has PATH XPATH PATTERN`) which won't fail if their XPath expression "no longer" matches. The author who changed "the shape" thus won't get notified and