Skip to content
Unlock AI’s true impact across the SDLC. Explore key findings from Gartner®.

What is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)?

AI often struggles with knowledge gaps and factual errors. Learn how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) helps solve this.

What is RAG?

Retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG, is a hybrid technique in generative AI in which large language models (LLMs) are enhanced by connecting them to external data sources. Instead of relying solely on the internal training data of the AI model, RAG systems retrieve relevant information from a knowledge base and use it to generate more accurate, context-aware responses.

The concept of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) began to gain traction in the early 2020s as AI researchers sought to overcome the limitations of static large language models. Once trained, an LLM’s knowledge is frozen, making it difficult to reflect new developments or domain-specific insights. RAG solves this by introducing a retrieval step that dynamically pulls in fresh, relevant data before generation. Early efforts focused on integrating information retrieval techniques with generative AI models, allowing systems to dynamically access external knowledge bases during inference. Over time, advancements in vector databases and scalable retrieval mechanisms enabled RAG architectures to deliver more accurate and contextually relevant responses, leading to their widespread adoption in various AI applications, including enterprise search and customer support. Today, RAG is foundational in many enterprise and developer tools, especially those requiring precision and up-to-date knowledge.

Why RAG matters in generative AI

Traditional large language models are impressive, but they’re not always trustworthy. They’re trained on massive datasets, but once training ends, their knowledge becomes static. This leads to several well-known issues:

  • Hallucinations: AI hallucination occurs when a large language model generates information that is inaccurate, fabricated, or unsupported by its training data or external sources. These hallucinations can lead to responses that sound plausible but are false or misleading, which is a common challenge for traditional generative AI systems. Because LLMs rely solely on their internal knowledge, they may inadvertently "invent" facts, citations, or details, especially when asked about topics outside their expertise or knowledge cutoff.

  • Outdated knowledge: A large language model’s training data represents a snapshot in time. Once an LLM has been trained, its internal knowledge doesn’t automatically update to reflect new information, emerging trends, or recent discoveries. As a result, LLMs may provide answers that are obsolete, miss current events, or lack the latest domain insights. This limitation can lead to inaccuracies, especially in fast-changing fields.

  • Limited domain expertise: Large language models often struggle with niche or specialized topics when those areas are not well represented in their training data. Because their internal knowledge is limited to what they've seen during training, LLMs might lack the depth or accuracy needed to answer highly specific questions. This can result in vague, incomplete, or even incorrect responses, as the model might attempt to fill gaps by generating plausible-sounding but ultimately unreliable information. These shortcomings are particularly evident when users seek up-to-date details or expert insights in fields that evolve rapidly or are highly technical.

RAG addresses these problems by adding a retrieval layer. When a user submits a query, the system first searches a knowledge base—often a vector database—for relevant documents. These documents are then passed to the LLM, which uses them to generate a response that’s grounded in real data. This approach improves:

  • Factual accuracy: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves factual accuracy by grounding the model’s responses in up-to-date, external data rather than relying solely on its fixed training knowledge. When a query is received, RAG systems retrieve relevant documents from a knowledge base, ensuring that the information used to generate answers is both current and contextually appropriate. This process minimizes the risk of hallucinations—where the model might otherwise fabricate details—and helps address outdated knowledge or limited domain expertise by supplementing the model with authoritative, real-world sources. As a result, RAG significantly reduces inaccuracies and enhances the trustworthiness of AI-generated content.

  • Relevance: RAG retrieves documents that are contextually aligned with the user’s query, ensuring that the generated output is tailored to the specific question or topic at hand. This process helps the model avoid generic or off-topic answers and instead produce responses that are directly supported by authoritative sources, making the content more meaningful and useful for the user.

  • Adaptability: RAG improves the adaptability of large language models by decoupling the model’s responses from its static training data and instead grounding them in dynamic, external sources. When the underlying data source—such as a knowledge base or vector database—is updated, the RAG system can immediately leverage the new information for future queries. This means the model can reflect the latest facts, trends, or domain-specific insights without the need for costly and time-consuming retraining. By simply changing or refreshing the data source, organizations can ensure their AI systems remain current and contextually aware, enabling rapid adaptation to new developments and evolving requirements.

RAG allows enterprises to maintain accuracy and relevance in their AI-powered workflows, especially in fast-paced environments where information changes frequently. The flexibility to swap or update data sources on demand makes RAG a powerful solution for keeping large language models up-to-date and responsive to emerging needs.

In fast-moving industries like software development, healthcare, and finance, RAG is becoming essential. It enables AI systems to stay current, accurate, and useful—qualities that are increasingly critical as generative AI becomes embedded in everyday workflows.

How RAG works

RAG combines two core processes: retrieval and generation. Together, they create a feedback loop that enhances the quality and relevance of AI-generated content.

  • Retrieval: When a query is received, the system uses a retriever to search a knowledge base for relevant documents. These are often stored in a vector database like Pinecone or FAISS, which enables fast similarity searches using embeddings. The retriever converts the query into a vector and finds the closest matches.

  • Generation: The retrieved documents are passed to a generator, typically an LLM, which uses them to produce a response. The model incorporates the external context into its output, making it more accurate and informative.

Key components of RAG systems

  • Vector databases: These store document embeddings, allowing for efficient similarity-based retrieval. They’re optimized for speed and scalability.

  • Retrievers: Algorithms that match queries to relevant documents. Common retrievers include sparse methods like BM25 and dense vector retrievers using neural networks.

  • Generators: LLMs like GPT-4 or BERT-based models that produce natural language responses based on retrieved content.

This architecture allows RAG systems to be modular and flexible. You can swap out retrievers, update databases, or change the generator model depending on your use case. That makes RAG ideal for building scalable, domain-specific AI solutions.

RAG vs. traditional large language models

RAG models outperform traditional LLMs in several key areas, especially when it comes to accuracy and adaptability. Here’s a quick comparison:

Feature

Traditional LLM

RAG LLM

Knowledge freshness

Static

Dynamic (via retrieval)

Accuracy

Prone to hallucination

Grounded in external data

Domain adaptability

Requires retraining

Update data source only

Use cases

General-purpose

Domain-specific, real-time

Cost of updates

High (retraining)

Low (data refresh)

When to use RAG vs fine-tuned LLMs

  • Use RAG when you need real-time, accurate, or domain-specific responses without retraining the model.

  • Use fine-tuned LLMs when your use case is narrow and stable, and you can afford the time and cost of retraining.

RAG is especially useful in environments where information changes frequently or where precision is critical—like software development, legal research, or healthcare. It’s also a great fit for enterprise applications where internal documentation and proprietary data need to be queried securely and efficiently.

Real-world applications of RAG

RAG is already transforming how developers and teams work. Here are some practical use cases where retrieval augmented generation is making a difference:

  • Code review: RAG systems can retrieve documentation, commit history, and best practices to assist in reviewing code. This helps developers catch bugs, enforce standards, and understand unfamiliar code faster.

  • Code generation: Developers can ask for code snippets, and RAG models generate them using up-to-date libraries and standards. This is especially useful for integrating APIs or writing boilerplate code.

  • AI coding assistants: AI coding tools like GitHub Copilot are evolving to include retrieval capabilities, allowing them to reference documentation, Stack Overflow posts, or internal wikis for better suggestions.

  • Code documentation: RAG can generate documentation by pulling context from codebases, comments, and related files. This reduces the manual effort required to maintain accurate documentation.

  • Enterprise search for dev teams: Developers can query internal knowledge bases to find relevant code, documentation, or bug reports. RAG enables semantic search, making it easier to find what you need—even if you don’t know the exact keywords.

These applications show how RAG-informed AI is becoming a critical tool for modern software teams. It’s not just about generating text—it’s about generating the right text, at the right time, with the right context.

RAG in software development

Developers are increasingly using RAG to build smarter tools that go beyond static AI assistants. Here’s how retrieval augmented generation is reshaping software development:

  • Integrated development environments (IDEs): RAG-powered plugins can provide contextual help, suggest fixes, and explain code based on project-specific documentation. This reduces context-switching and boosts productivity.

  • Code search: Instead of relying on keyword-based search, RAG enables semantic search across repositories. Developers can ask natural language questions and get relevant code snippets or documentation.

  • Documentation bots: These bots use RAG to generate or update documentation automatically. They can scan codebases, extract comments, and create readable documentation that evolves with the code.

Frameworks like LangChain make it easier to build these tools. LangChain connects LLMs with retrievers and vector stores, allowing developers to create custom RAG pipelines. Whether you’re building a chatbot, a search engine, or a coding assistant, LangChain provides the building blocks to get started quickly.

As more teams adopt RAG, we’re seeing a shift toward smarter, context-aware development environments that reduce friction and improve collaboration.

Challenges and considerations

While RAG offers many benefits, it’s not without challenges. Here are some key considerations when implementing RAG in your workflows:

  • Latency: Retrieving and processing external data adds time to response generation. Optimizing retrieval speed and caching frequently accessed data can help.

  • Cost: Running retrieval and generation pipelines can be resource-intensive, especially at scale. You’ll need to balance performance with infrastructure costs.

  • Data freshness: Keeping the knowledge base up to date requires ongoing effort. Automated data ingestion pipelines can help, but they add complexity.

  • Evaluation complexity: Measuring the quality of RAG outputs is harder than with traditional models. You need to evaluate both the relevance of retrieved documents and the coherence of generated responses.

  • Privacy and security: Accessing external data raises concerns about sensitive information and compliance. You’ll need to implement access controls, encryption, and audit trails.

Despite these challenges, many teams find that the benefits of RAG—especially in terms of accuracy and adaptability—far outweigh the drawbacks. With careful planning, you can build RAG systems that are fast, secure, and scalable.

Getting started with RAG

If you’re ready to explore RAG, here are some tools and frameworks to help you get started:

  • LangChain: A Python framework for building RAG pipelines with LLMs, retrievers, and vector stores. It’s modular, flexible, and widely used in the developer community.

  • Cohere: Offers APIs for retrieval and generation, with a focus on enterprise use cases. It’s a good choice for teams looking for managed services.

  • Pinecone: A managed vector database that integrates easily with RAG systems. It’s optimized for speed and scalability.

  • FAISS: An open-source library for efficient similarity search. It’s widely used in academic and commercial RAG implementations.

  • Haystack: A framework for building search and question-answering systems with RAG. It supports multiple backends and is great for building production-ready applications.

You’ll also find plenty of open-source tutorials and GitHub repos that walk through building RAG applications step by step. Whether you’re a solo developer or part of a larger team, there’s a growing ecosystem of tools and resources to support your journey into RAG AI.

The future of RAG

RAG is evolving fast, and it’s becoming a cornerstone of next-gen AI systems. Here’s what’s ahead:

  • Agentic AI: RAG will play a key role in autonomous agents that retrieve and act on information in real time. These agents can perform tasks, make decisions, and adapt to changing environments.

  • Hybrid models: Combining RAG with fine-tuned LLMs for better performance and adaptability. This allows systems to benefit from both general knowledge and domain-specific expertise.

  • Retrieval-enhanced agents: AI systems that use RAG to make decisions, write code, and interact with users more intelligently. These agents can access internal documentation, user data, and external sources to provide highly personalized responses.

As generative AI continues to grow, RAG will help ensure that outputs are not just fluent—but also factual, relevant, and grounded in reality. It’s a key ingredient in building trustworthy, scalable, and intelligent AI systems that can operate in complex, real-world environments.

TagsAI

Frequently asked questions

What is RAG?

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a method in generative AI that combines large language models with external data retrieval to produce more accurate and context-aware responses.

How does RAG work?

RAG systems first retrieve relevant documents from a knowledge base using a retriever, then pass those documents to a language model that generates a response based on the retrieved content.

What is RAG used for?

RAG is used in applications like code generation, documentation, enterprise search, and AI assistants where accuracy, context, and real-time knowledge are essential.

What is a large language model (LLM)?

A large language model (LLM) is an advanced computer program that understands and generates human language. It’s trained on vast amounts of text data to predict and create meaningful responses, making it useful for tasks like answering questions, writing content, and having conversations.

How do large language models work?

LLMs work by analyzing patterns in text data and learning how words and sentences relate to each other. When given a prompt, they use this knowledge to produce relevant and coherent text responses.

What is LLM in artificial intelligence (AI)?

In AI, an LLM refers to a type of model that specializes in language tasks. It’s a key component in systems that need to understand, generate, or interact using natural language, helping machines communicate more effectively with people.

Is ChatGPT a large language model?

Yes, ChatGPT is a well-known example of a large language model. It’s built using the same technology as other LLMs and is designed to chat, answer questions, and assist users in a conversational way.

How are LLMs trained?

LLMs are trained by processing huge collections of text from books, websites, and other sources. During training, they learn to predict words and phrases, gradually improving their ability to understand and generate language.

Are LLMs neural networks?

Yes, LLMs are built using neural networks—a type of computer architecture inspired by the human brain. Neural networks help LLMs recognize patterns and relationships in language data.

What are LLMs used for?

LLMs are used for a wide range of applications, including chatbots, virtual assistants, content creation, translation, summarization, and code generation. They help automate and enhance tasks that involve language.

What’s the difference between an LLM and AI?

AI is a broad field focused on making machines intelligent. LLMs are a specific type of AI model, specialized for language-related tasks. In other words, all LLMs are AI, but not all AI is an LLM.

What’s the difference between RAG and MCP (Model Context Protocol)?

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and Model Context Protocol (MCP) are two different techniques for enhancing the capabilities of large language models. RAG combines the strengths of large language models with external knowledge sources by retrieving relevant documents from a database and using them to inform and improve the responses generated, making it particularly effective for tasks requiring up-to-date or specialized information. MCP, on the other hand, focuses on structuring and transmitting contextual information between different components or models, enabling more efficient communication and collaboration across AI systems. While RAG augments generation with retrieved data for richer outputs, MCP standardizes the way context is shared and utilized, optimizing interoperability and workflow within complex AI ecosystems.